Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students

Science Education

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 371-383

  Johnson, Carla C ^a   Kahle, Jane Butler ^b   Fargo, Jamison D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247473845     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20195     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.
2. Berns, B. B., & Swanson, J. (2000, April). Middle school science: Working in a confused context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444944)
3. Darling-Hammond, L. D. (1997). The quality of teaching matters most. Journal of Staff Development, 18(1), 38-41.
4. Horizon Research, Inc. (1999). Local Systemic Change Classroom Observation Protocol. Retrieved August, 2000, from http://www.horizon-research. com.
5. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
6. Kahle, J., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 1019-1041.
7. Johnson, C. C. (in press). Whole-school sustained professional development and science teacher change: Signs of progress. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
8. Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. (in press). A study of sustained, whole-school, professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
9. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS® system for mixed models. Gary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
10. Luft, J. A. (2003). Induction programs for science teachers: What the research says. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (pp. 35-44). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
11. Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 912-946.
12. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: Author.
13. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Ohio Department of Education. (2003). Academic content standards: K-12 science. Columbus, OH: Center for Curriculum and Assessment, Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
15. Sanders, W. L. (2000). Value-added assessment from student achievement data: Opportunities and hurdles. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 329-339.
16. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247-256.
17. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement (Research progress report). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value Added Research and Assessment Center.
18. SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS 9.1 [Computer software], Cary, NC: Author.
19. Utah State Office of Education. (2005). Utah core content standards for science. Retrieved March 2006 from http://www.schools.utah.gov/curr/sci/ secondary/default.htm
20. Von Secker, C.E.,& Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1110-1126.
21. Wojnowski, B. S., Bellamy, M. L., & Cooke, S. (2003). A review of literature on the mentoring and induction of beginning teachers with an emphasis on the retention and renewal of science teachers. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (pp. 23-33). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
22. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11 (1), 57-67.
23. Wright J. C., & Wright C. S. (2000). A commentary on the profound changes envisioned by the national science standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 122-143.