Emergence of terminological conventions as a searcher-indexer coordination game

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2509-2529

  Bodoff, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDEX TERMS; INFORMATION ITEMS; LEARNING THEORY; MATCHING PROCESS; NEW THEORY;

FLUORINE CONTAINING POLYMERS; INFORMATION SERVICES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 72449159627     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21182     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anick, P., & Tipirneni, S. (1999). The paraphrase search assistant: Terminology feedback, for iterative information seeking. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 1.53-159). New York: ACM Press.
2. Avesani, P., & Agostini, A. (2003). A peer-to-peer advertising game. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2910: Service-Oriented Computing-ICSOC 2003, 28-42.
3. Bates, M. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(13), 1185-1205.
4. Bates, M.J. (1986). Subject access in online catalogs: A design model, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 357-376.
5. Bates, M.J. (1.990). Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing and Management, 26(5), 575-591.
6. Belkin, N.J. (1993). Interaction with, texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. Information Retrieval. '93: Von der Modellierung zur Anwendung, Proceedings of the First Conference of the Gesselschaft für Infomatik Fachgruppe Information Retrieval (pp. 55-66). Konstanz, Germany: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz.
7. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Head, J., Jeng, J., Kelly, D., & Lin, S., et al, (1999). Relevance feedback versus local context analysis as term suggestion devices: Rutgers' TREC-8 interactive track experience. In E.M. Vorhees & D. Harman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 8) (pp. 565-574). Gaithersburg, MD: National. Institute of Standards and Technology.
8. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., & Brooks, H.M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part 1 : Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71. (Pubitemid 13460041)
9. Cooper, R.W., DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T.W. (1990). Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. American Economic Review, 80(1), 218-233.
10. Erev, I., & Roth, A.E. (1998). Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review, 88(4), 848-881. (Pubitemid 128457289)
11. Fidel, R. (1991a). Searchers' selection of search keys: I. The selection routine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(7), 490-500.
12. Fidel, R. (1991b). Searchers' selection of search keys: III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(7), 515-527.
13. Fidel, R. (1994). User-centered indexing. Journal, of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 572-576.
14. Gilat, S., Meyer, J., Erev, I., & Gopher, D. (1997). Beyond. Bayes' theorem: Effect of base-rate information in consensus games. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(3), 83-104. (Pubitemid 127462884)
15. Green. R., & Bean, C.A. (1.995). Topical relevance relationships. II. An exploratory study and preliminary typology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46(9): 654-662.
16. Golder, S.A., & Huberman, B.A. (2006). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208.
17. Harman, D. (1988). Towards interactive query expansion. Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 321-331). New York: ACM Press.
18. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real, life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing and Management, 36, 207-227. (Pubitemid 30550546)
19. Lancaster, F.W. (2003). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. London: Facet.
20. Lau, T., & Horvitz, E. (1999). Patterns of search: Analyzing and modeling Web query refinement. In J. Kay (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling (UM 99) (pp. 119-128). New York: Springer.
21. Mai, J.-E. (2005). Analysis in indexing: Document and domain centered approaches. Information Processing and Management, 41, 599-611.
22. Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994). The nature of salience: An experimental investigation of pure coordination games. American Economic Review, 84(3), 658-673.
23. Miller, P. (2007, July). Swarm theory. National Geographic, 212(1), 127.
24. Ochs, J. (1990). The coordination problem in decentralized markets: An experiment. Quarterly Journal, of Economics, 105(2), 545-559.
25. Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P.A. (2001). A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal, 10, 334-350. (Pubitemid 33570972)
26. Rie, S.Y., & Xie, HJ, (2006). Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The iterative information retrieval context. Information Processing and Management, 42, 751-768.
27. Robertson, S.E. (1994). Query-document symmetry and dual models. Journal of Documentation, 50(3), 233-238.
28. Robertson, S.E., Maron, M.E., & Cooper, W.S. (1982). Probability of relevance: A unification of two competing models for document retrieval. Information Technology-Research and Development, 1, 1-21.
29. Saracevic, T. (1996). Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): A review and proposal. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 3-9). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
30. Saracevic, T. ( 1997). The stratified model of information retrieval interaction : Extension and applications. Proceedings of the 60th Annual. Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 313-327). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
31. Sauperl, A. (2004). Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge. Journal, of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 55-63.
32. Schatz, B.R., Johnson, E.H., Cochrane, P.A., & Chen, H. (1996). Interactive term suggestion for users of digital libraries: Using subject thesauri and co-occurrence lists for information retrieval. Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 126-133). New York: ACM Press.
33. SEMPO. (2009). The state of search engine marketing 2008. Available at: http://www.sempo.org/learning-center/research/2008-ex.ecsu.mmary.pdf
34. Sen, S., Lam, S.K.T., Rashid, A.M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., & Osterhouse, J., et al. (2006). Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings of 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW06) (pp. 181-1.90). New York: ACM Press.
35. Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (1997). Interaction in information retrieval: Selection and effectiveness of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741-761. (Pubitemid 127633879)
36. Steels, L. (1996). Emergent adaptive lexicons. From animals to animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth. International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (562-567). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Wilson, E.O. (2006, August). ANTS: The civilized insect. National Geographic, 210(2), 136.
38. van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., & Biel, R.O. (1990). Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. American Economic Review, 80(1), 234-248.
39. van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., & Rankin, EW. (1997). On the origin of convention: Evidence from coordination games. Economic Journal, 107(442), 576-596.
40. von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2004). Labeling images with a computer game. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004) (pp. 319-326). New York: ACM Press.