Analysis in indexing: Document and domain centered approaches

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 599-611

  Mai, Jens Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Domain analysis; Indexing; Subject analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEXT PROCESSING;

CONTEXT; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; INDEXING; SUBJECT ANALYSIS;

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 10644297207     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albrechtsen, H. (1993). Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis. The Indexer, 18, 219-224.
2. Albrechtsen, H., Pejtersen, A. M., & Cleal, B. (2002). Empirical work analysis of collaborative film indexing. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Emerging frameworks and methods. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on conceptions of library and information science (pp. 85-108). Greenwood Village: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Andersen, J., & Christensen, F. S. (2001). Wittgenstein and indexing theory. In H. Albrechtsen & J.-E. Mai (Eds.), Advances in classification research. Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR classification research workshop (vol. 10, pp. 1-21). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
4. Anderson, J. D. (1994). Standards for indexing: revising the American National Standard Guidelines Z39.4. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 628-636.
5. Bates, M. J. (1996). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 44, 155-164.
6. Bates, M. J. (1986). Subject access in online catalogs: a design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 357-376.
7. Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42, 84-113.
8. Bertrand, A., & Cellier, J. (1995). Psychological approach to indexing: effects of the operator's expertise upon indexing behaviour. Journal of Information Science, 21, 459-472.
9. Birnbaum, N. (1986). The arbitrary disciplines. In D. E. Chubin, A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini, & T. Connolly (Eds.), Interdisciplinary analysis and research (pp. 53-66). Mt Airy: Lomond.
10. Blair, D. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. New York: Elsevier.
11. Chu, C. M., & O'Brien, A. (1993). Subject analysis: the first critical stages in indexing. Journal of Information Science, 19, 439-454.
12. Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., & Rossini, F. A. (1986). Interdisciplinary research: The why and the how. In D. E. Chubin, A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini, & T. Connolly (Eds.), Interdisciplinary analysis and research (pp. 3-10). Mt Airy: Lomond.
13. Cooper, W. S. (1978). Indexing documents by gedanken experimentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 107-119.
14. Dogan, M. (2001). Specialization and recombination of specialties in the social sciences. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Balters (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14851-14855). New York: Elsevier.
15. Dogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1990). Creative marginality: innovations at the intersection of social sciences. Boulder: Westwiew Press.
16. Ec̀o, U. (1994). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17. Farrow, J. F. (1991). A cognitive process model of document indexing. Journal of Documentation, 47, 149-166.
18. Farrow, J. F. (1994). Indexing as a cognitive process. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 53(16), 155-171.
19. Fidel, R. (1994). User-oriented indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 572-576.
20. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class: the authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Frohmann, B. (1990). Rules of indexing: a critique of mentalism in information retrieval theory. Journal of Documentation, 46, 81-101.
22. Hjørland, B. (1992). The concept of "subject" in information science. Journal of Documentation, 48, 172-200.
23. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: an activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
24. Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58, 422-462.
25. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 400-425.
26. Hutchins, W. J. (1978). The concept of "aboutness" in subject indexing. Aslib Proceedings, 30, 172-181.
27. Introna, L. D. (1998). Language and social autopoiesis. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 5, 3-17.
28. ISO (1985). Documentation - Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects and selecting indexing terms. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 5963-1985.
29. Jacob, E. K., & Shaw, D. (1998). Sociocognitive perspectives on representation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33, 131-185.
30. Jones, K. (1976). Towards a theory of indexing. Journal of Documentation, 32, 118-125.
31. Klein, J. T. (1996a). Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
32. Klein, J. T. (1996b). Interdisciplinary needs: the current context. Library Trends, 44, 134-154.
33. Lancaster, F. W. (2003). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (3rd ed.). Champaign: Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois.
34. Langridge, D. W. (1989). Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Bowker-Saur.
35. Langridge, D. W. (1976). Classification and Indexing in the humanities. London: Butterworths.
36. Mai, J.-E. (2000). Deconstructing the indexing process. Advances in Librarianship, 23, 269-298.
37. Mai, J.-E. (2001). Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57, 591-622.
38. Milstead, J. L. (1994). Needs for research in indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 577-582.
39. Nielsen, M. L. (2001). A framework for work task based thesaurus design. Journal of Documentation, 57, 774-797.
40. Sauperl, A. (2004). Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 55-63.
41. Sauperl, A. (2002). Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
42. Sievert, M. C., & Andrews, M. J. (1991). Indexing consistency in information science abstracts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 1-6.
43. Soergel, D. (1985). Organizing information: principles of data base and retrieval systems. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
44. Swift, D. F., Winn, V. A., & Bramer, D. A. (1979). A sociological approach to the design of information systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 215-223.
45. Talja, S., Keso, H., & Pietilainen, T. (1999). The production of context in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view. Information Processing and Management, 35, 751-763.
46. Tennis, J. (in press). Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization.
47. Tibbo, H. R. (1994). Indexing for the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 607-619.
48. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: an essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley: University of California Press.