Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-63

  Šauperl, Alenka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION USE; LIBRARIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMIOTICS; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

CATALOGERS; SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION;

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 0345763351     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10351     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Albrechtsen, H., & Hjørland, B. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 400-425.
2. Barry, C.A. (1997). The research activity timeline: A qualitative tool for information research. Library and Information Science Research, 19, 153-179.
3. Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42, 84-113.
4. Chan, L.M. (1981). Cataloging and classification: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Chirban, J.T. (1996). Interviewing in depth: The interactive-relational approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Clark, H.H. (1998). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J.D. Glaser & R.R. Powel (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
8. Fiske, S.T., and Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries (1993). München: Saur.
10. Iivonen, M., and Sonnenwald, D.H. (1998). From translation to navigation of different discourses: A model of search term selection during the pre-online stage of the search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 312-326.
11. Langridge, D. W. (1989). Subject analysis: Principles and practice. London: Bowker-Sour.
12. Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Mai, J.-E. (2000). Deconstructing the indexing process. Advances in Librarianship, 23, 262-298.
14. Mai, J.-E. (2001). Semiotics and indexing: An analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57, 591-622.
15. Sauperl, A., and Saye, J.D. (1999). Subject determination during the cataloging process: An intensive study of five catalogers. In E.K. Jacob (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th ASIS SIG/CR classification research workshop (pp. 119-138). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science.
16. van Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., and Sandberg, J.A.C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive process. London: Academic Press.
17. Taylor, A.G. (1999). The organization of information. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
18. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.