Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management

Policy Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 341-368

  Hendriks, Carolyn M ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accountability; Democracy; Energy; Legitimacy; Long term policy design; Network governance; Participation; Representative; Sustainability; Transition management

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; DEMOCRACY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY MAKING; POLICY REFORM; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 72449144656     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9095-1     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. J Aars AL Fimreite 2005 Local governance and governance in Norway: Stretched accountability in network policy Scandinavian Political Studies 28 3 239 256 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00131.x (Pubitemid 41251379)
2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science, concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Auel, K. (2006). Multi-level governance, regional policy, and democratic legitimacy in Germany. In A. Benz & Y. Papadopoulous (Eds.), Governance and democracy (pp. 44-62). Oxon: Routledge.
4. Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bang, H., & Sørensen, E. (2001). The everyday maker: Building political rather than social capital. In P. Dekker & E. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 148-161). London: Routledge.
6. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Bastingstoke: Macmillan.
8. Beetham, D., & Boyle, K. (1995). Introducing democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Bekkers, V., & Edwards, A. (2007). Legitimacy and democracy. In V. Bekkers, G. Dijkstra, A. Edwards, & M. Fenger (Eds.), Governance and the democratic deficit (pp. 35-60). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
10. Benhabib, S. (1996a). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting boundaries of the political (pp. 67-94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Benhabib, S. (Ed.). (1996b). Democracy and difference: Contesting boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), Systems innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48-75). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13. M Bevir 2006 Democratic governance: Systems and radical perspectives Public Administration Review 66 3 426 436 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00599.x (Pubitemid 43937471)
14. Birch, A. H. (1993). The concepts and theories of modern democracy. London: Routledge.
15. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation-pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. L Carson S White C Hendriks J Palmer 2002 Community consultation in environmental policy making The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs 3 1 1 13
17. S Chambers 2003 Deliberative democracy theory Annual Review of Political Science 6 307 326 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 (Pubitemid 37395356)
18. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
19. Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 407-437). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Cottrell, F. (1955). Energy and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs?. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Dahl, R. A. (1985). Controlling nuclear weapons: Democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
23. F de Rynck J Voets 2006 Democracy in area-based networks: The case of ghent American Review of Public Administration 36 1 58 78 10.1177/ 0275074005282585 (Pubitemid 43812368)
24. Denters, B., van Heffen, O., Huisman, J., & Klok, P.-J. (Eds.). (2003). The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Dietz, F., Brouwer, H., & Wetterings, R. (2008). Energy transition experiments in the Netherlands. In J. C. J. M. van den Bergh & F. R. Bruinsma (Eds.), Managing the transition to renewable energy (pp. 217-244). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
26. Dobson, A. (1996). Representative democracy and the environment. In W. L. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 124-139). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
27. A Downs 1972 Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle The Public Interest 28 1 38 50
28. Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
29. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. JS Dryzek 2001 Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy Political Theory 29 5 651 669 10.1177/0090591701029005003
32. Dryzek, J. S. (2007). Networks and democratic ideals: Equality, freedom, and communication. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 262-273). London: Palgrave.
33. Eckersley, R. (2000). Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk: Towards a democracy of the affected. In M. Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 117-132). London: Routledge.
34. Esmark, A. (2007). Democratic accountability and network governance-problems and potentials. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 274-296). London: Palgrave.
35. Estlund, D. (1997). Beyond fairness and deliberation: The epistemic dimension of democratic authority. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 173-204). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36. ETF. (2006). More with energy: Opportunities for the Netherlands [Meer Met Energie: Kansen Voor Nederland]. The Hague: Energy Transition Taskforce Force.
37. Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The elite connection: Problems and potentials of western democracy. New York: Basic Books.
38. EZ. (2004). Innovation in energy policy [Innovatie in Het Energiebeleid]. The Hague: Ministerie voor Economische Zaken.
39. Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
40. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment. Durham: Duke University.
41. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy-discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
43. Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (2000). The quest for deliberative democracy. In M. Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 17-27). London: Routledge.
44. Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
45. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovation in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
47. Geels, F. W., Elzen, B., & Green, K. (2004). General introduction: Systems innovation and transitions to sustainability. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), Systems innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 1-16). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
48. Gerlach, L. (1978). Energy wars and social change. In S. Abbott & J. van Willingen (Eds.), Predicting social change (pp. 76-94). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
49. Ginger, C. (2006). Interpretive content analysis: Stories and arguments in analytic documents. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 331-348). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
50. Grin, J. (2006). Reflexive modernization as a governance issue-or designing and shaping re-Structuration. In J.-P. Vo, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 57-81). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
51. Gunderson, A. (1995). The environmental promise of deliberation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
53. Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
54. Heilbroner, R. L. (1974). An enquiry into the human prospect. New York: Harper & Row.
55. CM Hendriks 2002 Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives Australian Journal of Public Administration 61 1 64 75 10.1111/1467-8500.00259
56. CM Hendriks 2005 Participatory storylines and their impact on deliberative forums Policy Sciences 38 4 1 20 10.1007/s11077-005-0870-3 (Pubitemid 41754514)
57. CM Hendriks 2008 On inclusion and network governance: The democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions Public Administration 86 4 1009 1031
58. CM Hendriks J Grin 2007 Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 3-4 333 350 10.1080/15239080701622790
59. Hilgartner, S. (2000). Science on stage: Expert advice as public drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
60. Hirst, P. Q. (1995). Can secondary associations enhance democratic governance? In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Associations and democracy: The real utopias project (Vol. 1, pp. 101-113). London: Verso.
61. Holden, M. (2006). Reflections on how political scientists (and others) might think about energy policy. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 872-889). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. C Hunold 2001 Corporatism, pluralism, and democracy: Toward a deliberative theory of bureaucratic accountability Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration 14 2 151 167 (Pubitemid 33404441)
63. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge.
64. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
65. Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In J.-P. Vo, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 103-130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
66. F Kern A Smith 2008 Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands Energy Policy 36 11 4093 4103 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
67. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.
68. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
69. Lafferty, W. L., & Meadowcroft, J. (1996a). Democracy and the environment: Congruence and conflict-preliminary reflections. In W. L. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 1-17). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
70. Lafferty, W. M., & Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.). (1996b). Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
71. Lasswell, H. (1951). The policy orientation. In H. Lasswell & D. Lerner (Eds.), The policy sciences (pp. 1-15). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
72. Lasswell, H. (1965). The world revolution of our times: A framework for basic policy research. In H. Lasswell & D. Lerner (Eds.), World revolutional elites: Studies in coercive ideological movements. Cambridge: MIT Press. p Chp. 2.
73. Latour, B. (2005). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public-atmospheres of democracy (pp. 4-31). Karlsruhe & Cambridge, MA: ZKM & MIT Press.
74. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
75. JJ Linz 1998 Democracy's time constraint International Political Science Review 19 1 19 37 10.1177/019251298019001002
76. Loorbach, D., & Kemp, R. (2008). Transition management for the Dutch energy transition: Multilevel governance aspects. In J. C. J. M. van den Bergh & F. R. Bruinsma (Eds.), Managing the transition to renewable energy (pp. 243-264). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
77. Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2005). Managing transitions for sustainable development. In X. Olsthoorn & A. Wieczorek (Eds.), Understanding industrial transformation views from different disciplines (pp. 187-206). Leusden: Springer.
78. Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1982). Brittle power: Energy strategy for national security. Andover, Ma: Brick House Publishing Company.
79. RC Luskin JS Fishkin R Jowell 2002 Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain British Journal of Political Science 32 3 455 487 10.1017/S0007123402000194
80. Majone, G. (1996). Temporal consistency and policy credibility: Why democracies need non-majoritarian institutions. European University Institute, Working Paper RSC, 96/57.
81. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
82. Marcussen, M., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Democratic network governance in Europe. London: Palgrave.
83. Marres, N. (2005). Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippman and Dewey debate. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public-atmospheres of democracy (pp. 208-217). Karlsruhe & Cambridge, MA: ZKM & MIT Press.
84. Mayer, I., de Vries, J., & Geurts, J. (1995). An evaluation of the effects of participation in a consensus conference. In S. Joss & D. John (Eds.), Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe (pp. 109-124). London: Science Museum.
85. J Meadowcroft 2005 Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state New Political Economy 10 4 479 498 10.1080/13563460500344419 (Pubitemid 43135165)
86. J Meadowcroft 2007 Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 3-4 299 314 10.1080/15239080701631544
87. D Miller 1992 Deliberative democracy and social choice Political Studies 40 Special Issue 54 67 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01812.x
88. C Mouffe 1999 Deliberative democracy or agnostic pluralism? Social Research 66 3 745 758
89. S Niemeyer 2004 Deliberation in the wilderness: Displacing symbolic politics Environmental Politics 13 2 347 372 10.1080/0964401042000209612 (Pubitemid 38830789)
90. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action-public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91. Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity: A prologue to the political theory of the steady state. San Francisco: Freeman.
92. SM Opsina J Dodge 2005 It's about time: Catching method up to meaning-the usefulness of narrative inquiry in public administration research Public Administration Review 62 2 143 157
93. DW Orr 1979 U.S. energy policy and the political economy of participation The Journal of Politics 41 4 1027 1056 10.2307/2129732
94. J Parkinson 2003 Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy Political Studies 51 1 180 196 10.1111/1467-9248.00419 (Pubitemid 37023266)
95. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
96. Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M., & Rowthorn, B. (1992). Social corporatism: A superior economic system?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. LJ Perelman 1980 Speculations on the transition to sustainable energy Ethics 90 3 392 416 10.1086/292170
98. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
99. Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2001). Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
101. Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
102. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. London: Oxford University Press.
103. A Rehfeld 2006 Towards a general theory of political representation The Journal of Politics 68 1 1 21 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x
104. Rein, M., & Schön, D. A. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 145-166). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
105. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
106. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University.
107. J Rotmans R Kemp M van Asselt 2001 More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy Foresight 3 1 15 31 10.1108/ 14636680110803003
108. Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2008). Transition management: Reflexive governance of societal complexity through searching, learning and experimenting. In J. C. J. M. van den Bergh & F. R. Bruinsma (Eds.), Managing the transition to renewable energy (pp. 15-46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
109. M Saward 2001 Making democratic connections: Political equality, deliberation and direct democracy Acta Politica 36 Winter 361 379
110. Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: effective and democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Schmitter, P., & Lehmbruch, G. (Eds.). (1979). Trends towards corporate intermediation. California: Sage, Beverley Hills.
112. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Kansas: University of Kansas.
113. Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
114. LA Scruggs 1999 Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen western democracies British Journal of Political Science 29 1 1 31 10.1017/S0007123499000010
115. Senternovem. (2005). Gespreksverslag Betreft Transitietraining Energietransite. Competentie Centrum Transities. 4 Oct 2005. http://www.senternovem.nl/mmfiles/051004%20Transitietraining%20definitief-tcm24- 178888.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2007.
116. E Shove G Walker 2007 Caution! Transitions ahead: politics, practice and sustainable transition management Environment & Planning A 39 763 770 10.1068/a39310 (Pubitemid 46722996)
117. C Skelcher N Mathur M Smith 2005 The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy Public Administration 83 3 573 596 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x (Pubitemid 41702210)
118. T Skocpol 1999 Associations without members The American Prospect 45 July-August 66 73
119. Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative democracy and the environment. New York: Routledge.
120. A Smith F Kern 2009 The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy Environmental Politics 18 1 78 98 10.1080/09644010802624835
121. E Sørensen 2002 Democratic theory and network governance Administrative Theory and Praxis 24 4 693 720
122. E Sørensen 2006 Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance The American Review of Public Administration 36 1 98 114 10.1177/0275074005282584 (Pubitemid 43812367)
123. E Sørensen J Torfing 2003 Network politics, political capital, and democracy International Journal of Public Administration 26 6 609 634 10.1081/PAD-120019238
124. E Sørensen J Torfing 2005 The democratic anchorage of network governance Scandinavian Political Studies 28 3 195 218 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005. 00129.x (Pubitemid 41251377)
125. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theoretical approaches to democratic network governance. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 233-246). London: Palgrave.
126. SL Star JR Griesemer 1989 Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-37 Social Studies of Science 19 3 387 420 10.1177/ 030631289019003001
127. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox and political reason: The art of political decision making, Revised Edition. New York: WW Norton & Company.
128. Taiclet, A.-F. (2006). Governance, expertise and competitive politics: The case of territorial development in France. In A. Benz & Y. Papadopoulous (Eds.), Governance and democracy (pp. 63-80). Oxon: Routledge.
129. Truman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
130. Urbinati, N. (2005). Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
131. M Van De Kerkhof A Weiczorek 2005 Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 6 733 747 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.002 (Pubitemid 40792395)
132. van Lente, H. (2006). De Blinde Vlekken van Transities. Het Financieele Dagblad, 14 March 2006.
133. van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (Eds.). (2000). Political modernisation and the environment. The renewal of environmental policy arrangements. Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
134. van Vliet, B., Chappells, H., & Shove, E. (2005). Infrastructures of consumption: Environmental innovation in the utility industries. London: Earthscan.
135. F Vollenbroek 2002 Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation Journal of Cleaner Production 10 215 223 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00048- 8 (Pubitemid 34065078)
136. Vo, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
137. J-P Vo J Newig B Kastens J Monstadt B Nölting 2007 Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 3-4 193 212 10.1080/15239080701622881
138. Vo, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (forthcoming). Designing long term policies: Reflexivity and political robustness. Policy Sciences (special issue).
139. VROM. (2001). Een Wereld En Een Wil. Nationaal Milieubeleidsplan. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, The Hague.
140. VROM. (2006). Beleid Met Burgers (Policy with Citizens), Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, The Hague. Accessed April 7, 2009, from http://www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=16572.
141. VROM & AER. (2004). Energietransitie: Klimaat Voor Nieuwe Kansen, Joint advice from the VROMraad and the Algemene Energieraad (AER). The Hague.
142. ME Warren 2002 What can democratic participation mean today? Political Theory 30 5 677 701 10.1177/0090591702030005003
143. S Wätli D Kübler Y Papadopoulos 2004 How democratic is "governance"? Lessons from Swiss drug policy Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17 1 83 113
144. Willems, U., & von Winter, T. (Eds.). (2000). Politische Repräsentation Schwacher Interessen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
145. M Wolsink 2007 Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation Energy Policy 35 5 2692 2704 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002 (Pubitemid 46381419)
146. Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
147. Yanow, D. (2006). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), The handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods (pp. 405-415). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
148. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.