Legitimacy and democracy: A conceptual framework for assessing governance practices

Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 35-60

  Bekkers, Victor ^a   Edwards, Arthur ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938499508     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1962), 'Two Faces of Power,' American Political Science Review 56: 4, 947-52.
2. Beetham, D. (1991), The Legitimation of Power (London: Macmillan).
3. Beetham, D and Lord, C. (1998), Legitimacy and the European Union (London, New York: Longman).
4. Bellamy, Chr. and Taylor, J. A. (1998), Governing in the Information Age (Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press).
5. Birkland, Th. A. (2001), An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making (Armonk, New York: Sharpe).
6. Brecht, A. (1959), Political Theory: the Foundations of Twentieth-Century Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
7. Bekkers, V. J. J. M. and Homburg, V. F. M. (2002), 'Administrative supervision and information relationships,' Information Polity 7: 2/3, 129-41.
8. Bekkers, V. J. J. M. and Homburg, V. F. M. (eds) (2005), The Information Ecology of E-government (Amsterdam: IOS Press).
9. Benhabib, S. (1994), 'Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy,' Constellations 1: 1, 26-52.
10. Birch, A. H. (2001), Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy (London: Routledge).
11. Budge, I. (1996), The New Challenge of Direct Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
12. Chambers, S. (2003), 'Deliberative democratic theory,' Annual Review of Political Science 6, 307-26.
13. Cohen, J. (1989), 'Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,' in Hamlin and Pettit (eds.).
14. Coleman, S. and Gotze, J. (2001), Bowling Together. Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation (London: Hansard Society).
15. Dahl, R. A. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press).
16. Dahl, R. A. (1989), Democracy and its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press).
17. Daudt, H. (1975), 'Legitimiteit en legitimatie,' Beleid and Maatschappij 2: 1, 5-16.
18. Donk, W. van de, Loader, B., Nixon, P. and Rucht D. (eds) (2004), Cyber Protest. New Media, Citizen Mobilization and Social Movements (London, New York: Routledge).
19. Dror, Y. (1989), Public Policy-Making, Re-examined (Scranton: Chandler Publishing Company).
20. Duncan, G. (ed.) (1983), Democratic Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21. Easton, D. (1965), A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: Wiley).
22. Edelenbos, J. and Monnikhof, R. (eds) (2001), Lokale Interactieve Beleidsvorming (Utrecht: Lemma).
23. Eder, K. (1995), 'Die Dynamik demokratischer Institutionenbildung. Strukturelle Voraussettzungwen deliberativer Demokratie in fortgeschrittenen Industriegesellschaften,' in Nedelman (ed.).
24. Engelen, E. R. and Sie Dhian Ho, M. (eds) (2004), De Staat van de Democratie. Democratie Voorbij de Staat (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
25. Friedrich, C. J. (1963), Man and his Government (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company).
26. Haan, I. de (1993), Zelfbestuur en Staatsbeheer (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
27. Habermas, J. (1992/1996), Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
28. Habermas, J. (1994), 'Three normative models of democracy,' Constellations 1(1), 1-10.
29. Hamlin, A. and Pettit, P. (eds) (1989), The Good Polity; Normative Analysis of the State (Oxford: Blackwell).
30. Held, D. (ed.) (1991), Political Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity Press).
31. Held, D. (ed.) (1996), Models of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
32. Hendriks, F. and Toonen, T. (2000), Polder Politics (Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar).
33. Hill, M. and Hupe, P. (2005), Street-level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability Paper presented at the Ninth International Research Symposium on Public Management, April 6-8, (Milan: Bocconi University Milan).
34. Hirst, P. (1994), Associative Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
35. Hirst, P. (2000), 'Democracy and Governance,' in Pierre (ed.), pp. 13-35.
36. Jonghe, K. de and Bursens, P. (2003), How to increase legitimacy in the European Union? The concept of multi-level governance legitimacy PSW-paper 2003: 4, (Antwerp: University of Antwerp).
37. Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1994), How Parties Organise: Change and Adaptation in Party Organisation in Western Democracies (London: Sage).
38. Kielmansegg, P. (1971), 'Legitimitat als analytische Kategorie,' Politische Vierteljahresschrift 12: 3, 367-401.
39. Kim, Y. C. (1966), 'Authority: Some conceptual and empirical notes,' Western Political Quarterly 19: 2, 223-34.
40. Klijn, E. H. and J. F. F. M. Koppenjan (2000). Politicians and interactive decisionmaking: institutional spoilsports or playmakers. Public Administration 78: 2, 365-387.
41. Kriesi, H. (1996), 'The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context,' Mc Adam, D. et al. (eds), pp. 152-84.
42. Lasswell, H. (1936/1958), Politics: Who Gets What, When and How (New York: Meridian Books).
43. Lehning, P. (1991), 'De theorie van het pluralisme,' in Thomassen (ed.), pp. 107-128.
44. Luhmann, N. (1969), Legitimation durch Verfahren (Neuwied: Luchterhand).
45. March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1995), Democratic Governance (New York: Free Press).
46. McAdam, D., McCarthy, D., Zald, M. N. (eds). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
47. Meier, A. J. and Bovens, M. A. P. (2005), 'Public Accountability in the Information Age,' in Bekkers and Homburg (eds), pp. 171-82.
48. Miller, D. (1983), 'The competitive model of democracy,' in Duncan (ed.), pp. 133-55.
49. Morris, C. W. (1998), An Essay on the Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
50. Nedelman, B. (ed.) (1995), 'Politische Institutionen im Wandel,' Kolner Zeitschrift fur Sociologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 35, 327-45.
51. Norris, P. (2002), Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing Political Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
52. Offe, C. and Preuss U. (1991), 'Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources,' in Held (ed.), pp. 143-71.
53. Pierre, J. (ed.) (2000), Debating Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
54. Potman, H. P. (1989), Acceptatie van Beleid (Zeist: Kerckebosch).
55. Praag, H. van (2003), 'The Winners and Losers in a Turbulent Political Year,' Acta Politica 38: 1, 5-21.
56. Przeworski, A., S. C. Stokes, Manin, B. (eds), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
57. Sabine, G. H. (1952), 'The two democratic traditions,' The Philosophical Review 61: 4, 451-74.
58. Saward, M. (1998), The Terms of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
59. Saward, M. (ed.) (2000), Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association (London: Routledge).
60. Saward, M. (ed.) (2001), 'Making Democratic Connections: Political Equality, Deliberations and Direct Democracy,' Acta Politica 36: 4, 361-79.
61. Schaar, J. H. (1981), Legitimacy in the Modern State (New Brunswick: Transaction Books).
62. Scharpf, F. W. (1997), Games Real Actors Play (Oxford: Westview Press).
63. Scharpf, F. W. (1998), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
64. Stone, D. (2002), The Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision-Making (New York, London: Norton and Company).
65. Thomassen, J. J. A. (ed.) (1991), Hedendaagse Democratie (Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H. D. Tjeenk Willink).
66. Weber, M. (1922/1972), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck).
67. Wille, A. (2001), 'Politieke participatie en representativiteit in het interactieve beleidsproces,' in Edelenbos and Monnikhof (eds), pp. 87-115.