Differential contribution of Bud6p and Kar9p to microtubule capture and spindle orientation in S. cerevisiae

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 167, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 231-244

  Huisman, Stephen M ^a   Bales, Olivia A M ^a   Bertrand, Marie ^a   Smeets, Monique F M A ^a   Reed, Steven I ^b   Segal, Marisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN BUD6P; PROTEIN KAR9P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BUD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; MUTANT; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST CELL;

ACTINS; CYTOSKELETON; DYNEIN ATPASE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; MICROFILAMENT PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULE PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHENOTYPE; PLASMIDS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 7244250025     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200407167     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adames, N.R., J.R. Oberle, and J.A. Cooper. 2001. The surveillance mechanism of the spindle position checkpoint in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 153:159-168.
2. Amberg, D.C., J.E. Zahner, J.W. Mulholland, J.R. Pringle, and D. Botstein. 1997. Aip3p/Bud6p, a yeast actin-interacting protein that is involved in morphogenesis and the selection of bipolar budding sites. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:729-753.
3. Bardin, A.J., and A. Amon. 2001. Men and sin: what's the difference? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:815-826.
4. Beach, D.L., J. Thibodeaux, P. Maddox, E. Yeh, and K. Bloom. 2000. The role of the proteins Kar9 and Myo2 in orienting the mitotic spindle of budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 10:1497-1506.
5. Carminati, J.L., and T. Stearns. 1997. Microtubules orient the mitotic spindle in yeast through dynein-dependent interactions with the cell cortex. J. Cell Biol. 138:629-641.
6. Eshel, D., L.A. Urrestarazu, S. Vissers, J.C. Jauniaux, J.C. van Vliet-Reedijk, R.J. Planta, and I.R. Gibbons. 1993. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for normal nuclear segregation in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:11172-11176.
7. Glotzer, M. 2001. Animal cell cytokinesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17:351-386.
8. Gupta, M.L., Jr., C.J. Bode, D.A. Thrower, C.G. Pearson, K.A. Suprenant, K.S. Bloom, and R.H. Himes. 2002. β-Tubulin C354 mutations that severely decrease microtubule dynamics do not prevent nuclear migration in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:2919-2932.
9. Heil-Chapdelaine, R.A., N.R. Adames, and J.A. Cooper. 1999. Formin' the connection between microtubules and the cell cortex. J. Cell Biol. 144:809-811.
10. Heil-Chapdelaine, R.A., J.R. Oberle, and J.A. Cooper. 2000. The cortical protein Num1p is essential for dynein-dependent interactions of microtubules with the cortex. J. Cell Biol. 151:1337-1344.
11. Hwang, E., J. Kusch, Y. Barral, and T.C. Huffaker. 2003. Spindle orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the transport of microtubule ends along polarized actin cables. J. Cell Biol. 161:483-488.
12. Jensen, S., M. Segal, D.J. Clarke, and S.I. Reed. 2001. A novel role of the budding yeast separin Esp1 in anaphase spindle elongation: evidence that proper spindle association of Esp1 is regulated by Pds1. J. Cell Biol. 152:27-40.
13. Jensen, S., M. Geymonat, A.L. Johnson, M. Segal, and L.H. Johnston. 2002. Spatial regulation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Lte1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 115:4977-4991.
14. Korinek, W.S., M.J. Copeland, A. Chaudhuri, and J. Chant. 2000. Molecular linkage underlying microtubule orientation toward cortical sites in yeast. Science. 287:2257-2259.
15. Kusch, J., A. Meyer, M.P. Snyder, and Y. Barral. 2002. Microtubule capture by the cleavage apparatus is required for proper spindle positioning in yeast. Genes Dev. 16:1627-1639.
16. Kusch, J., D. Liakopoulos, and Y. Barral. 2003. Spindle asymmetry: a compass for the cell. Trends Cell Biol. 13:562-569.
17. Lee, L., J.S. Tirnauer, J. Li, S.C. Schuyler, J.Y. Liu, and D. Pellman. 2000. Positioning of the mitotic spindle by a cortical microtubule capture mechanism. Science. 287:2260-2262.
18. Li, Y.Y., E. Yeh, T. Hays, and K. Bloom. 1993. Disruption of mitotic spindle orientation in a yeast dynein mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:10096-10100.
19. Liakopoulos, D., J. Kusch, S. Grava, J. Vogel, and Y. Barral. 2003. Asymmetric loading of Kar9 onto spindle poles and microtubules ensures proper spindle alignment. Cell. 112:561-574.
20. Maddox, P., E. Chin, A. Mallavarapu, E. Yeh, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 1999. Microtubule dynamics from mating through the first zygotic division in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 144:977-987.
21. Maekawa, H., and E. Schiebel. 2004. Cdk1-Clb4 controls the interaction of astral microtubule plus ends with subdomains of the daughter cell cortex. Genes Dev. 18:1709-1724.
22. McCollum, D., and K.L. Gould. 2001. Timing is everything: regulation of mitotic exit and cytokinesis by the MEN and SIN. Trends Cell Biol. 11:89-95.
23. Miller, R.K., D. Matheos, and M.D. Rose. 1999. The cortical localization of the microtubule orientation protein, Kar9p, is dependent upon actin and proteins required for polarization. J. Cell Biol. 144:963-975.
24. Miller, R.K., S.C. Cheng, and M.D. Rose. 2000. Bim1p/Yeb1p mediates the Kar9p-dependent cortical attachment of cytoplasmic microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:2949-2959.
25. Moseley, J.B., I. Sagot, A.L. Manning, Y. Xu, M.J. Eck, D. Pellman, and B.L. Goode. 2004. A conserved mechanism for Bni1- and mDia1-induced actin assembly and dual regulation of Bni1 by Bud6 and profilin. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:896-907.
26. Nakamura, M., X.Z. Zhou, and K.P. Lu. 2001. Critical role for the EB1 and APC interaction in the regulation of microtubule polymerization. Curr. Biol. 11:1062-1067.
27. Palmer, R.E., D.S. Sullivan, T. Huffaker, and D. Koshland. 1992. Role of astral microtubules and actin in spindle orientation and migration in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 119:583-589.
28. Pereira, G., T.U. Tanaka, K. Nasmyth, and E. Schiebel. 2001. Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J. 20:6359-6370.
29. Pearson, C.G., and K. Bloom. 2004. Dynamic microtubules lead the way for spindle positioning. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:481-492.
30. Pearson, C.G., P.S. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2001. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152:1255-1266.
31. Rappaport, R. 1996. Cytokinesis in Animal Cells. Vol. 32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 386 pp.
32. Segal, M., and K. Bloom. 2001. Control of spindle polarity and orientation in S. cerevisiae. Trends Cell Biol. 11:160-166.
33. Segal, M., D.J. Clarke, P. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, K. Bloom, and S.I. Reed. 2000a. Coordinated spindle assembly and orientation requires Clb5-dependent kinase in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 148:441-451.
34. Segal, M., K. Bloom, and S.I. Reed. 2000b. Bud6 directs sequential microtubule interactions with the bud tip and bud neck during spindle morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:3689-3702.
35. Segal, M., K. Bloom, and S.I. Reed. 2002. Kar9p-independent microtubule capture at Bud6p cortical sites primes spindle polarity before bud emergence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:4141-4155.
36. Shaw, S.L., E. Yeh, P. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 1997. Astral microtubule dynamics in yeast: a microtubule-based searching mechanism for spindle orientation and nuclear migration into the bud. J. Cell Biol. 139:985-994.
37. Sherman, P., G. Fink, and J.B. Hicks. 1986. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
38. Smeets, M.F.M.A., and M. Segal. 2002. Spindle polarity in S. cerevisiae: MEN can tell. Cell Cycle. 1:308-311.
39. Straight, A.F., W.F. Marshall, J.W. Sedat, and A.W. Murray. 1997. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. Science. 277:574-578.
40. Theesfeld, C.L., J.E. Irazoqui, K. Bloom, and D.J. Lew. 1999. The role of actin in spindle orientation changes during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 146:1019-1032.
41. Tirnauer, J.S., E. O'Toole, L. Berrueta, B.E. Bierer, and D. Pellman. 1999. Yeast Bim1p promotes the G1-specific dynamics of microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 145:993-1007.
42. Yeh, E., R.V. Skibbens, J.W. Cheng, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 1995. Spindle dynamics and cell cycle regulation of dynein in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 130:687-700.
43. Yeh, E., C. Yang, E. Chin, P. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, D.J. Lew, and K. Bloom. 2000. Dynamic positioning of mitotic spindles in yeast: role of microtubule motors and cortical determinants. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:3949-3961.
44. Yin, H., D. Pruyne, T.C. Huffaker, and A. Brestscher. 2000. Myosin V orientates the mitotic spindle in yeast. Nature. 406:1013-1015.