The role of environmental management in consumers preferences for corporate social responsibility

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 495-506

  Araña, Jorge E ^a   León, Carmelo J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Choice experiments; Consumer preferences; Corporate social responsibility; Environmental performance; Heuristics mixture modelling; Stated preferences

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MIXTURES;

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MIXTURE-MODELLING; STATED PREFERENCES;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

CORPORATE STRATEGY; ECONOMIC PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HEURISTICS; MONETARY POLICY; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL POLICY; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 72249115978     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9297-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Araña JE, León CJ, Hanemann WM (2008) Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice methods for valuing health care programmes for the elderly. J Health Econ 27(3): 753-769.
2. Auger P, Burke P, Devinney TM, Louviere J (2003) What will consumers pay for social product features?. J Bus Ethics 42: 281-304.
3. Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark 61: 68-84.
4. Campbell D, Hutchinson G, Scarpa R (2008) Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ Res Econ, forthcoming.
5. Cantillo V, Heydecker B, de Dios Ortuzar J (2006) A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values. Transp Res B 40(9): 807-825.
6. Creyer E, Ross W (1997) The influence of firm behaviour on purchase intentions: do consumers really care about bussiness ethics?. J Consum Mark 14(6): 421-436.
7. Davids M (1990) The champion of corporate social resposibility. Bus Soc rev 74: 40-43.
8. DeShazo JR, Fermo G (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. J Environ Econ Manage 43(3): 360-385.
9. Ellen P, Mohr L, Webb D (2000) Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?. J Retailing 76(3): 393-406.
10. Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive and compensatory screening rules. Mark Sci 23: 391-406.
11. Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2006) Estimating heterogeneous EBA and economic screening rule choice models. Mark Sci 25: 494-509.
12. Harrison R (2003) Corporate social responsibility and the consumer movement. Consum Policy Rev 13(4): 127-131.
13. Hensher DA (2006) How do respondents handle stated choice experiments?-attribute processing strategies under varying information load. J Appl Econ 21: 861-878.
14. Hensher DA, Rose J (2009) Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: implications for willingness to pay. Transp Res E, forthcoming.
15. Isa M (2003) Applying the triple bottom line approach. Bus Times, May 12.
16. Kinder Lydenberg Domini & Co. Inc (1999) Socrates: the corporate social ratings monitor. Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini Co. Inc, Cambridge.
17. Lafferty B, Goldsmith R (1999) Corporate credibility's role in consumer's attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the Ad. J Bus Res 44(2): 109-116.
18. Louviere JJ, Hensher D, Swait J (2000) Stated choice methods. analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (eds) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105-142.
20. Puckett SM, Hensher DA (2008) The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders under variable road user charges. Transp Res E 44(3): 379-395.
21. Sen S, Bhattarcharya C (2001) Does going good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res 38: 225-243.
22. Smith HJ (2003) The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(4): 85-90.
23. Swait J, Louviere J (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J Mark Res 30: 305-314.
24. Swait J, Adamowicz W (2001) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching. J Cons Res 28: 135-148.
25. Tanner TA, Wong WH (1987) The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 528-549.
26. Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.