Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: Implications for willingness to pay

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 583-590

  Hensher, David A ^a   Rose, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attribute preservation; Choice experiments; Information processing; Non attendance; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTE PRESERVATION; CAR DRIVER; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; DATA SET; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS; NON-ATTENDANCE; STATED CHOICE; TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

TRAVEL TIME;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MODELING; TRAVEL TIME; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 67349157564     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2008.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bonini N., Tentori K., and Rumiati R. Contingent application of the cancellation editing operation: the role of semantic relatedness between risky outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17 (2004) 139-152
2. Cantillo V., and Ortúzar J.de.D. A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception. Transportation Research 39B (2005) 641-657
3. Cantillo V., Heydecker B., and de Dios Ortuzar J. A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values. Transportation Research B 40 9 (2006) 807-825
4. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (Eds). Heuristics and Biases - The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., in press. Ordered choice, heterogeneity, and attribute processing. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy.
6. Hensher D.A. How do respondents handle stated choice experiments? - attribute processing strategies under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (2006) 861-878
7. Hensher D.A. Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42 2 (2008) 297-322
8. Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., 2008. Non-Attendance and Dual Processing of Common-Metric Attributes in Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, August.
9. Hensher, D.A., Layton, D., 2008. Common-Metric Attribute Parameter Transfer and Cognitive Rationalisation: Implications for Willingness to Pay. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, July.
10. Hensher D.A., Rose J., and Greene W. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 32 3 (2005) 203-222
11. Hensher D.A., Rose J., and Bertoia T. The implications on willingness to pay of a stochastic treatment of attribute processing in stated choice studies. Transportation Research E 43 1 (2007) 73-89
12. Hess, S., Hensher, D., 2008. Using conditioning on observed choices to retrieve individual-specific attribute processing strategies. Transportation Research B (special issue).
13. Houston D.A., and Sherman S.J. Cancellation and focus: the role of shared and unique features in the choice process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31 (1995) 357-378
14. Kahnemann D., and Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47 2 (1979) 263-291
15. Layton, D., Hensher, D.A., 2008. Aggregation of common-metric attributes in preference revelation in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay. Transportation Research D (special issue).
16. Puckett S.M., and Hensher D.A. The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders under variable road user charges. Transportation Research E 44 (2008) 379-395
17. Rose J.M., and Bliemer M.C.J. Stated preference experimental design strategies. In: Hensher D.A., and Button K. (Eds). Transport Modelling. second ed. Handbooks in Transport vol. 1 (2007), Elsevier Science, Oxford (Chapter 8)
18. Sandor Z., and Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science 21 4 (2002) 455-475
19. Scarpa, R., Gilbride, T., Campbell, D., Hensher, D.A., 2008. Modeling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments: does it matter? May.
20. Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs. Transportation Research B 35 10 (2001) 903-928
21. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge