Radiographic comparison of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 583-586

  Leonard, M ^a   Magill, P ^a   Kiely, P ^a   Khayyat, G ^a  

^a Our Lady's Hospital   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Hip; Leg length; Off set; Resurfacing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 35748956114     PISSN: 16338065     EISSN: 14321068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-007-0228-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Asayama I (2002) Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J Arthroplasty 17:747-751
2. Asayama I (2005) Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:414-420
3. Beaule PE (2004) Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 418:87-93
4. Bose WJ (2000) Accurate limb-length equalization during total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 23:433
5. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice, vol 3. Springer, New York
6. De Smet (2002) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip 12:158-162
7. Devane PA (1997) Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement: a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 79-A:682-689
8. Giles LG (1981) Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality. Spine 6:510
9. Hodge WA (1991) A relationship between stem orientation and function following following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6:229-235
10. Johnston RC (1979) Reconstruction of the hip: a mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 61:639-652
11. Jolles BM (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:282-288
12. Kelley SS (1994) High hip centre in revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:503-510
13. Loughead JM (2005) Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B:163-166
14. McGrory BJ (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 77-B:865
15. Midland Medical Technology Limited (2001) The clinical and cost effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing
16. Nunn D (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71-B:629-631
17. Rothman RH (1993) The effect of varying femoral offset on component fixation in cemented total hip arthroplasty: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery 60th annual meeting, San Franciso
18. Sakalkale DP (2001) Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 388:125
19. Silva M (2004) The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86-A:40-46
20. Tannast M (2005) Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop 438:182-190
21. Vineet K (2004) Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment. J Arthroplasty 20:887-891
22. Williamson JA (1978) Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 134:135-138
23. Woolson ST (1999) Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14:159
24. Yamaguchi T (2004) Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction, abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12:164-167