Comparing negative and positive campaign messages: Evidence from two field experiments

American Politics Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 54-83

  Arceneaux, Kevin ^a   Nickerson, David W ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Campaign communications; Field experiments; Grassroots mobilization; Political campaigns; Turnout; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 72149128881     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X09331613     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Angrist, J.D., Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D.B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444-455.
2. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
3. Arceneaux, K. (2005). Using cluster randomized field experiments to study voting behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 169-179.
4. Arceneaux, K. (2007). I'm asking for your support: The effects of personally delivered campaign messages on voting decisions and opinion formation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 43-65.
5. Arceneaux, K., Gerber, A.S., & Green, D.P. (2006). Comparing experimental and matching methods using a large-scale field experiment on voter mobilization. Political Analysis, 14(1), 37-62.
6. Bergan, D.E., Gerber, A.S., Green, D.P., & Panagopoulos, C. (2005). Grassroots mobilization and voter turnout in 2004. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 760-777.
7. Bloom, H., & Price, D.H. (1975). Voter response to short-run economic conditions. American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1240-1254.
8. Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Chong, D., & Druckman, J.N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-655.
10. Clinton, J.D., & Lapinski, J.S. (2004). Targeted advertising and voter turnout: An experimental study of the 2000 presidential election. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 69-96.
11. Cobb, M.D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 88-121.
12. Cover, A.D. (1986). Presidential evaluations and voting for congress. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 786-801.
13. Damore, D.F. (2002). Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Research Quarterly, 55(3), 669-685.
14. Doherty, K.M., & Gimpel, J.G. (1997). Candidate character vs. the economy in the 1992 election. Political Behavior, 19(3), 177-196.
15. Druckman, J.N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066.
16. Druckman, J.N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671-681.
17. Druckman, J.N. (2007). Competing frames in a political campaign: How frames work and the challenges of studying them. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University.
18. Fazio, R.H. (2000). Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 1-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Finkel, S.E., & Geer, J. (1998). A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1189-1208.
20. Fiorina, M.P., & Shepsle, K.A. (1989). Is negative voting an artifact? American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 423-439.
21. Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1189-1208.
22. Fridkin, K.L., & Kenney, P.J. (2004). Do negative messages work? The impact of negativity on citizens' evaluations of candidates. American Politics Research, 32(5), 570-605.
23. Gerber, A.S., & Green, D.P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653-663.
24. Gerber, A.S., Green, M., & Green, D.P. (2003). Partisan mail and voter turnout: Results from randomized field experiments. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 563-579.
25. Goldstein, K., Franz, M., & Ridout, T. (2002). Political advertising in 2000. Combined file [Dataset codebook]. Final release. Madison, WI: Department of Political Science at University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.
26. Green, D.P., & Gerber, A.S. (2004). Get out the vote! Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
27. Green, D.P., Gerber, A.S., & Nickerson, D.W. (2003). Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics, 65, 1083-1096.
28. Jordan, N. (1965). The asymmetry of liking and disliking: A phenomenon meriting further reflection and research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 315-322.
29. Kahn, K.F., & Kenney, P.J. (1999). Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 877-890.
30. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
31. Kernell, S. (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting. American Political Science Review, 71(1), 44-66.
32. Key, V.O. (1966). The responsible electorate. New York: Random House.
33. La Raja, R. (2003). State parties and soft money: How much party building? In J. C. Green & R. Farmer (Eds.), The state of the parties: 2000 and beyond (pp. 132-150). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34. La Raja, R., & Jarvis-Shean, E. (2001). Assessing the impact of a ban on soft money: Party soft money spending in the 2000 elections. Policy brief for Institute of Governmental Studies and Citizens' Research Foundation, Berkeley, CA.
35. Lau, R.R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior, 4(4), 353-377.
36. Lau, R.R., & Pomper, G.M. (2002). Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 47-66.
37. Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., & Gaeth, G.J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188.
38. Miller, P.M., & Fagley, N.S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 517-522.
39. Nelson, T., Oxley, Z.M., & Clawson, R.A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221-246.
40. Nickerson, D.W. (2006). Volunteer phone calls can increase turnout: Evidence from eight field experiments. American Politics Research, 34, 271-292.
41. Nickerson, D.W. (2007). Quality is job one: Volunteer and professional phone calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 269-282.
42. Nickerson, D.W., Friedrichs, R.K., & King, D.C. (2006). Partisan mobilization campaigns in the field: Results from a statewide turnout experiment in Michigan. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 85-97.
43. Ohman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fear, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and learning. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
44. Phelps, E.A. (2005). The interaction of emotion and cognition: The relation between the human amygdala and cognitive awareness. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 61-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Rosenstone, S.J., & Hansen, J.M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
46. Sigelman, L., & Buell, E.H., Jr. (2003). You take the high road and I'll take the low road? The interplay of attack strategies and tactics in presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics, 65, 518-531.
47. Takemura, K. (1994). Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. Journal of Psychology, 128(1), 33-39.
48. Vavreck, L., Spiliotes, C.J., & Fowler, L.L. (2002). The effects of retail politics in the Hew Hampshire primary. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 595-610.
49. Wattenberg, M.P., & Brians, C.L. (1999). Negative campaign advertising: Demobilizer or mobilizer? American Political Science Review, 93(4), 891-899.