Actions travel with their objects: Evidence for dynamic event files

Psychological Research

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 50-58

  Spapé, Michiel M ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72149127685     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0219-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. Blaser, E., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Holcombe, A. O. (2000). Tracking an object through feature space. Nature, 408, 196-199.
3. Carey, S., & Xu, F. (2001). Infants' knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179-213.
4. Colzato, L. S., Fagioli, S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 591-595.
5. Colzato, L. S., Warrens, M. J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785-1804.
6. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
8. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
9. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
10. Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71, 42-63.
11. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
12. Horowitz, T. S., Klieger, S. B., Fencsik, D. E., Yang, K. K., Alvarez, G. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 172-184.
13. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
14. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
15. Mitroff, S. R., & Alvarez, G. A. (2008). Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press).
16. Oksama, L., & Hyönä, J. (2004). Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher-order cognition? An individual difference approach. Visual cognition, 11, 631-671.
17. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: a sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
18. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Annan, V., Jr. (2006). Dynamics of target selection in multiple object tracking (MOT). Spatial Vision, 19(6), 485-504.
19. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 1-19.
20. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Feldman, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177.
21. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
22. Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
23. Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.
24. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273-293.