Dynamics of target selection in Multiple Object Tracking (MOT)

Spatial Vision

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 485-504

  Pylyshyn, Zenon W ^a   Annan Jr , Vidal ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Attention capture; Multiple object tracking; Selection; Tracking

Indexed keywords

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TRACKING (POSITION);

ATTENTION CAPTURE; MULTIPLE OBJECT TRACKING; VISUAL INDEX (FINST) THEORY;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 33846204836     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856806779194017     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Annan, V. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Can indexes be voluntarily assigned in multiple object tracking? Journal of Vision 2, 243a.
2. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F. and Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: attentional set for perceptual transients, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 26, 594-606.
3. Bauer, B., Jolicur, P. and Cowan, W. B. (1999). Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search, Vision Research 39, 2681-2695.
4. Bricolo, E., Gianesini, T., Fanini, A., Bundesen, C. and Chelazzi, L. (2002). Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A direct behavioral demonstration, J. Cognitive Neumsci. 14, 980-993.
5. Burkell, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1997). Searching through subsets: a test of the visual indexing hypothesis, Spatial Vision 11, 225-258.
6. Cave, K. R. and Zimmerman, J. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychol. Sci. 8, 399-403.
7. Comtois, R. (1999), VisionShell PPC Software Library.
8. Dosher, B. A., Liu, S.-H., Blair, N. and Lu, Z.-L. (2004). The spatial window of the perceptual template and endogenous attention, Vision Research 44, 1257-1271.
9. Duncan, J., Ward, R. and Shapiro, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision, Nature 369, 313-315.
10. Eckstein, M. P., Pham, B. T. and Shimozaki, S. S. (2004). The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues, Vision Research 44, 1193-1207.
11. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A. and Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets, J. Exper. Psychol. 10, 32-39.
12. Eriksen, C. W. and St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model, Perception and Psychophysics 40, 225-240.
13. Franconeri, S. L. and Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention, Perception and Psychophysics 65, 999-1010.
14. Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J. and Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11, 876-881.
15. Friedman-Hill, S. and Wolfe, J. M. (1995). Second-order parallel processing: visual search for odd items in a subset, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 21, 531-551.
16. Green, B. F. and Anderson, L. K. (1956). Color coding in a visual search task, J. Exper. Psychol. 51, 19-24.
17. Hulleman, J. (2005). The mathematics of multiple object tracking: from proportions correct to number of objects tracked, Vision Research 45, 2298-2309.
18. Johnson, J. D., Hutchison, K. A. and Neill, W. (2001). Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 27, 841-847.
19. Julesz, B. and Papathomas, T. V. (1984). On spatial-frequency channels and attention, Perception and Psychophysics 36, 398-399.
20. LaBerge, D. (1998). Attentional emphasis in visual orienting and resolving, in: Visual Attention. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, R. D. Wright (Ed.), Vol. 8. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 417-454.
21. McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z. and Crisp, J. (1991). Filtering by movement in visual search, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 17, 55-64.
22. Mordkoff, J. T. and Egeth, H. E. (1993). Response time and accuracy revisited: converging support for the interactive race model, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 19, 981-991.
23. Mueller, M. M., Teder-Saelejaervi, W. A. and Hillyard, S. A. (1998). The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention, Nature Neuroscience 1, 631-634.
24. Nakayama, K. and Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions, Nature 320, 264-265.
25. Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 Questions with nature and win: projective comments on the papers of this symposium, in: Visual Information Processing, W. Chase (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 283-308.
26. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention, Quart. J. Exper. Psychol. 32, 3-25.
27. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: a sketch of the FINST spatial-index model, Cognition 32, 65-97.
28. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2000). Situating vision in the world, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 197-207.
29. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision, Cognition 80, 127-158.
30. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA, USA.
31. Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism, Spatial Vision 3, 1-19.
32. Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Dennis, J. L. M. (in preparation). Can Multiple Object Tracking make use of individual object properties?
33. Pylyshyn, Z. W., Burkell, J., Fisher, B., Sears, C., Schmidt, W. and Trick, L. (1994). Multiple parallel access in visual attention, Canad. J. Exper. Psychol. 48, 260-283.
34. Saarinen, J. (1996). Localization and discrimination of 'pop-out' targets, Vision Research 36, 313-316.
35. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: the state of the art, Cognition 80, 1-46.
36. Shulman, G. L. and Wilson, J. (1987). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information, Perception 16, 89-101.
37. Solomon, J. A. (2004). The effect of spatial cues on visual sensitivity, Vision Research 44, 1209-1216.
38. Theewues, J. (1994). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection, Perception 23, 429-440.
39. Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11, 65-70.
40. Townsend, J. T. and Wenger, M. J. (2004). The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11, 391-418.
41. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology 12, 97-136.
42. Trick, L. M. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision, Psychol. Rev. 101, 80-102.
43. Viswanathan, L. and Mingolla, E. (2002). Dynamics of attention in depth: evidence from multi-element tracking, Perception 31, 1415-1437.
44. Wolfe, J. M. (1992). 'Effortless' texture segmentation and 'parallel' visual search are not the same thing, Vision Research 32, 757-763.
45. Woodman, G. F. and Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 29, 121-138.
46. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture, Current Directions in Psychological Science 2, 156-161.
47. Yeshurun, Y. and Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution, Nature 396, 72-75.