Approaches to continental intraplate earthquake issues

Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

Volumn 425, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-16

  Stein, Seth ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Continental deformation; Intraplate earthquakes; Seismic hazards

Indexed keywords

BALANCING; DEFORMATION; GEODESY; GLACIAL GEOLOGY; HAZARDS; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); SEISMIC RESPONSE; TECTONICS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNLOADING;

CONTINENTAL DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE; EASTERN NORTH AMERICA; INTRAPLATE EARTHQUAKES; PLATE-DRIVING FORCE; PREDICTIVE VALUES; SEISMIC HAZARDS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

EARTHQUAKES;

DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE; GEODESY; LAST GLACIATION; PLATE TECTONICS; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMICITY; SEISMOLOGY; SPACE; UNLOADING;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 72049133561     PISSN: 00721077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1130/2007.2425(01)     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abrams, D., 2001, Will Gujarat's problem be ours: Mid-America Earthquake Center Newsletter, April, v. 4, p. 2-3.
2. Argus, D.F., and Gordon, R.G., 1996, Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 13, 555-13, 572, doi 10.1029/95JB03775.
3. Atkinson, G., 2007, this volume, Challenges in seismic hazard analysis for continental interiors, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(21).
4. Bada, G., Grenerczy, G., Toth, L., Horvath, F., Stein, S., Windhoffer, G., Fodor, L., Fejes, I., Pinter, N., and Cloetingh, S., 2007, this volume, Motion of Adria and ongoing inversion of the Pannonian Basin: Seismicity, GPS velocities and stress transfer, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(16).
5. Beavers, J., 2001, Kutch earthquake: What we now know: Mid-America Earthquake Center Newsletter, February, v. 4, p. 2-4.
6. Bendick, R., Bilham, R., Fielding, E., Gaur, V.K., Hough, S.E., Kulkarni, M.N., Martin, S., Mueller, K., and Mukul, M., 2001, The 26 January 2001 "Republic Day" earthquake, India: Seismological Research Letters, v. 72, p. 328-335.
7. Bennett, R.A., Davis, J.L., and Wernicke, B.P., 1999, Present-day pattern of Cor- dilleran deformation in the Western United States: Geology, v. 27, p. 371374, doi 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0371:PDPOCD>2.3.CO;2.
8. Bent, A., and Delahaye, E., 2007, this volume, H/V at short distances for four hardrock sites in eastern Canada and implications for seismic hazard assessment, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(22).
9. Calais, E., Mattioli, G., DeMets, C., Nocquet, J.-M., Stein, S., Newman, A., and Rydelek, P., 2005, Tectonic strain in plate interiors?: Nature, v. 438, doi 10.1038/nature04428.
10. Calais, E., Han, J., and DeMets, C., 2006, Deformation of the North American plate from a decade of continuous GPS measurements: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 111, doi 10.1029/2005JB004253.
11. Camelbeeck, T., Vanneste, K., Alexandre, P., Verbeeck, K., Petermans, T., Rosset, P., Everaerts, M., Warnant, R., and Van Camp, M., 2007, this volume, Relevance of active faulting and seismicity studies to assess long-term earthquake activity in Northwest Europe, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi: 10.1130/2007.2425(14).
12. Chase, C.G., 1972, The n-plate problem of plate tectonics: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, v. 29, p. 117-122.
13. Chase, C.G., 1978, Plate kinematics: The Americas, East Africa, and the rest of the world: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 37, p. 355-368, doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90051-1.
14. Chu, D., and Gordon, R.G., 1999, Evidence for motion between Nubia and Somalia along the Southwest Indian ridge: Nature, v. 398, p. 64-67, doi: 10.1038/18014.
15. Crandell, J., 2007, this volume, Policy development and uncertainty in earthquake risk in the New Madrid seismic zone, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi: 10.1130/2007.2425(25).
16. Crone, A.J., and Luza, K.V., 1990, Style and timing of Holocene surface faulting on the Meers fault, southwestern Oklahoma: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 102, p. 1-17, doi 10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<0001: SATOHS>2.3.CO;2.
17. Crone, A.J., De Martini, P.M., Machette, M.N., Okumura, K., and Prescott, J.R., 2003, Paleoseismicity of two historically quiescent faults in Australia: Implications for fault behavior in stable continental regions: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 93, p. 1913-1934.
18. DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F., and Stein, S., 1990, Current plate motions: Geophysical Journal International, v. 101, p. 425-478.
19. DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F., and Stein, S., 1994, Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motion: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2191-2194, doi: 10.1029/94GL02118.
20. Dixon, T.H., Mao, A., and Stein, S., 1996, How rigid is the stable interior of the North American plate?: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 23, p. 30353038, doi 10.1029/96GL02820.
21. Ellis, M.E., Gomberg, J., and Schweig, E., 2001, Indian earthquake may serve as analog for New Madrid earthquakes: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 82, p. 345-350, doi 10.1029/01EO00211.
22. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2001, HAZUS 99 Estimated Annualized Losses for the United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication 366.
23. Flesch, L.M., Holt, W.E., Haines, A.J., and Shen-Tu, B., 2000, Dynamics of the Pacific-North American plate boundary zone in the western United States: Science, v. 287, p. 834-836, doi 10.1126/science.287.5454.834.
24. Frankel, A., 2004, How can seismic hazard in the New Madrid seismic zone be similar to that in California?: Seismological Research Letters, v. 75, p. 575-586.
25. Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E., Dick- man, N., Hanson, S., and Hopper, M., 1996, National Seismic Hazard Maps Documentation: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-532, 110 p.
26. Gan, W., and Prescott, W., 2001, Crustal deformation rates in central and eastern U.S. inferred from GPS: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 28, p. 3733-3736, doi 10.1029/2001GL013266.
27. Gangopadhyay, A., and Talwani, P., 2003, Symptomatic features of intraplate earthquakes: Seismological Research Letters, v. 74, p. 863-883.
28. Gangopadhyay, A., and Talwani, P., 2007, this volume, Two-dimensional numerical modeling suggests preferred geometry of intersecting seismogenic faults, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(07).
29. Giardini, D., Grunthal, G., Shedlock, K.M., and Zhang, P., 2000, The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map: Seismological Research Letters, v. 71, p. 679-686.
30. Gordon, R.G., Stein, S., DeMets, C., and Argus, D.F., 1987, Statistical tests for closure of plate motion circuits: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 14, p. 587-590.
31. Grollimund, B., and Zoback, M.D., 2001, Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone?: Geology, v. 29, p. 175-178.
32. Hasegawa, H.S., and Basham, P., 1989, Spatial correlation between seismicity and postglacial rebound in eastern Canada, in Gregerson, S., and Basham, P., eds., Earthquakes at North Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound: Dordrecht, Kluwer, p. 483-500.
33. Hinzen, K., and Reamer, S., 2007, this volume, Seismicity, seismotectonics, and seismic hazard in the northern Rhine Area, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(15).
34. Hough, S., 2007, this volume, Remotely triggered earthquakes following moderate mainshocks, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(06).
35. Hough, S., Armbruster, J.G., Seeber, L., and Hough, J.F., 2000, On the modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811/1812 New Madrid, central United States, earthquakes: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 105, p. 23, 839-23, 864, doi 10.1029/2000JB900110.
36. Jackson, J., and McKenzie, D., 1988, The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, v. 93, p. 45-73.
37. Jacobi, R., Lewis, C.F., Armstrong, D., and Blasco, S., 2007, this volume, Popup field in Lake Ontario south of Toronto, Canada: Indicators of late glacial and post-glacial strain, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(10).
38. James, T.S., and Bent, A.L., 1994, A comparison of eastern North America seismic strain-rates to glacial rebound strain-rates: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2127-2130, doi 10.1029/94GL01854.
39. Kafka, A., 2007, this volume, Does seismicity delineate zones where future large earthquakes are likely to occur in intraplate environments?, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(03).
40. Kenner, S.J., and Segall, P., 2000, A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes: Application to the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 289, p. 2329-2332, doi 10.1126/science.289.5488.2329.
41. Klosko, E.R., Stein, S., Hindle, D., Kley, J., Norabuena, E., Dixon, T., and Liu, M., 2002, Comparison of GPS, seismological, and geologic observations of Andean mountain building, in Stein, S., and Freymueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 123-133.
42. Kreemer, C., Haines, J., and Holt, W.E., 2002, The global moment rate distribution within plate boundary zones, in Stein, S., and Freymueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 173-190.
43. Leonard, M., Robinson, D., Allen, T., Schneider, J., Clark, D., Dhu, T., and Burbidge, D., 2007, this volume, Toward a better model for earthquake hazard in Australia, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(17).
44. Li, Q., Liu, M., and Yang, Y., 2002, The 01/26/2001 Bhuj earthquake: Intraplate or interplate?, in Stein, S., and Freymueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 255-264.
45. Li, Q., Liu, M., Zhang, Q., and Sandoval, E., 2007, this volume, Stress evolution and seismicity in the central-eastern USA: Insight from geodynamic modeling, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(11).
46. Liu, M., Zhu, Y., Stein, S., Yang, Y., and Engeln, J., 2000, Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 27, p. 3005-3008, doi 10.1029/2000GL008532.
47. Liu, M., Yang, Y., Stein, S., and Klosko, E., 2002, Crustal shortening and extension in the Andes from a viscoelastic model, in Stein, S., and Frey- mueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 325-339.
48. Liu, M., Yang, Y., Shen, Z., Wang, S., Wang, M., and Wan, Y., 2007, this volume, Active tectonics and intracontinental earthquakes in China: The kinematics and geodynamics, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(19).
49. Lomnitz, C., and Castanos, H., 2007, this volume, Disasters and maximum entropy production, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(26).
50. Mazzotti, S., 2007, this volume, Geodynamic models for North America intraplate earthquakes, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(02).
51. Mazzotti, S., and Adams, J., 2005, Rates and uncertainties on seismic moment and deformation in eastern Canada: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 110, doi 10.1029/2004JB003510.
52. Mazzotti, S., James, T., Henton, J., and Adams, J., 2005, GPS crustal strain, postglacial rebound, and seismic hazard in eastern North America: The Saint Lawrence valley example: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 110, doi 10.1029/2004JB003590.
53. McKenna, J., Stein, S., and Stein, C.A., 2007, this volume, Is the New Madrid seismic zone hotter and weaker than its surroundings?, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(12).
54. Minster, J.B., and Jordan, T.H., 1978, Present-day plate motions: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 83, p. 5331-5354.
55. Minster, J.B., Jordan, T.H., Molnar, P., and Haines, E., 1974, Numerical modeling of instantaneous plate tectonics: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, v. 36, p. 541-576.
56. Morgan, W.J., 1968, Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 73, p. 1959-1982.
57. Newman, A., Stein, S., Weber, J., Engeln, J., Mao, A., and Dixon, T., 1999, Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 284, p. 619-621, doi 10.1126/science.284.5414.619.
58. Newman, A., Stein, S., Schneider, J., and Mendez, A., 2001, Uncertainties in seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone: Seismological Research Letters, v. 72, p. 653-667.
59. Nocquet, J.M., Calais, E., and Parsons, B., 2005, Geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Europe: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 32, doi 10.1029/2004GL022174.
60. Okal, E., and Sweet, J., 2007, this volume, Frequency-size distributions for intraplate seismicity, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(05).
61. Pacheco, J., Sykes, L.R., and Scholz, C.H., 1993, Nature of seismic coupling along simple plate boundaries of the subduction type: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 98, p. 14, 133-14, 159.
62. Pancha, A., Anderson, J., and Kreemer, C., 2006, Comparison of seismic and geodetic scalar moment rates across the Basin and Range Province: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 96, p. 11-32, doi 10.1785/0120040166.
63. Peltier, W.R., 2004, Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: The ICE-5G (VM2) model: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 32, p. 111-149, doi 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359.
64. Reading, A., 2007, this volume, The seismicity of the Antarctic plate, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(18).
65. Rydelek, P.A., 2007, New Madrid strain and postseismic transients: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 88, p. 60-61.
66. Rydelek, P.A., and Pollitz, F.F., 1994, Fossil strain from the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2303-2306, doi 10.1029/94GL02057.
67. Sarkar, D., Sain, K., Reddy, P.R., Catchings, R.D., and Mooney, W.D., 2007, this volume, Seismic reflection images of the crust beneath the 2001 M = 7.7 Kutch (Bhuj) epicentral region, western India, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(20).
68. Schulte, S.M., and Mooney, W.D., 2005, An updated global earthquake catalogue for stable continental regions: Reassessing the correlation with ancient rifts: Geophysical Journal International, v. 161, p. 707-721, doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02554.x.
69. Schweig, E.S., and Ellis, M.A., 1994, Reconciling short recurrence intervals with minor deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 264, p. 1308-1311, doi 10.1126/science.264.5163.1308.
70. Searer, G., 2007, this volume, Does it make sense from engineering and economic perspectives to design for a 2475-year earthquake?, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(23).
71. Sella, G.F., Dixon, T.H., and Mao, A., 2002, REVEL: A model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 107, no. B4, doi 10.1029/2000JB000033.
72. Sella, G.F., Stein, S., Dixon, T., Craymer, M., James, T., Mazzotti, S., and Dokka, R., 2006, Observations of glacial isostatic adjustment in stable North America with GPS: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 34, doi:
73. 10.1029/2006GL02708.
74. Stein, R.S., and Hanks, T.C., 1998, M > 6 earthquakes in Southern California during the twentieth century: No evidence for a seismicity or moment deficit: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 88, p. 635-652.
75. Stein, S., 2004a, Comment on "How can seismic hazard in the New Madrid seismic zone be similar to that in California?" by A. Frankel: Seismologi- cal Research Letters, v. 75, p. 362-363.
76. Stein, S., 2004b, No free lunch: Seismological Research Letters, v. 75, p. 555-556.
77. Stein, S., 2007, New Madrid GPS: Much ado about nothing?: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 88, p. 58-60.
78. Stein, S., and Gordon, R.G., 1984, Statistical tests of additional plate boundaries from plate motion inversions: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 69, p. 401-412, doi 10.1016/0012-821X(84)90198-5.
79. tein, S., and Newman, A., 2004, Characteristic and uncharacteristic earthquakes as possible artifacts: Applications to the New Madrid and Wabash seismic zones: Seismological Research Letters, v. 75, p. 170-184.
80. Stein, S., and Sella, G.F., 2002, Plate boundary zones: Concept and approaches, in Stein, S., and Freymueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 1-26.
81. Stein, S., and Wysession, M., 2003, Introduction to Seismology, Earthquakes, and Earth Structure: Oxford, Blackwell, 498 p.
82. Stein, S., Sleep, N.H., Geller, R.J., Wang, S.C., and Kroeger, G.C., 1979, Earthquakes along the passive margin of eastern Canada: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 6, p. 537-540.
83. Stein, S., Cloetingh, S., Sleep, N., and Wortel, R., 1989, Passive margin earthquakes, stresses, and rheology, in Gregerson, S., and Basham, P., eds., Earthquakes at North Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound: Dordrecht, Kluwer, p. 231-260.
84. Stein, S., Sella, G.F., and Okal, E.A., 2002, The January 26, 2001, Bhuj earthquake and the diffuse western boundary of the Indian plate, in Stein, S., and Freymueller, J., eds., Plate Boundary Zones: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 243-254.
85. Stein, S., Newman, A., and Tomasello, J., 2003, Should Memphis build for California's earthquakes?: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 84, p. 177, 184-185.
86. Stein, S., Friedrich, A., and Newman, A., 2005, Dependence of possible characteristic earthquakes on spatial sampling: illustration for the Wasatch seismic zone, Utah: Seismological Research Letters, v. 76, p. 432-436.
87. Swafford, L., and Stein, S., 2007, this volume, Limitations of the short earthquake record for seismicity and seismic hazard studies, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(04).
88. Sykes, L.R., 1978, Intraplate seismicity, reactivation of pre-existing zones of weakness, alkaline magmatism, and other tectonism postdating continental fragmentation: Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, v. 16, p. 621-688.
89. Tuttle, M.P., 2001, The use of liquefaction features in paleoseismology: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central U.S.: Journal of Seismology, v. 5, p. 361-380, doi 10.1023/A:1011423525258.
90. Van Arsdale, R., Bresnahan, R., McCallister, N., and Waldron, B., 2007, this volume, The upland complex of the central Mississippi River valley: Its origin, denudation, and possible role in reactivation of the New Madrid seismic zone, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(13).
91. Wang, Z., 2007, this volume, Seismic hazard and risk assessment in the intraplate environment: The New Madrid seismic zone of the central United States, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(24).
92. Wesnousky, S.G., 1994, The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 84, p. 1940-1959.
93. Wesnousky, S.G., and Leffler, L.M., 1992, The repeat time of the 1811 and 1812 New Madrid earthquakes: A geological perspective: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 82, p. 1756-1785.
94. Wiens, D.A., DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Stein, S., Argus, D., Engeln, J.F., Lundgren, P., Quible, D., Stein, C., Weinstein, S., and Woods, D.F., 1985, A diffuse plate boundary model for Indian Ocean tectonics: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 12, p. 429-432.
95. Wu, P., and Johnston, P., 2000, Can deglaciation trigger earthquakes in North America?: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 27, p. 1323-1326, doi 10.1029/1999GL011070.
96. Wu, P., and Mazzotti, S., 2007, this volume, Effects of a lithospheric weak zone on postglacial seismotectonics in eastern Canada and northeastern USA, in Stein, S., and Mazzotti, S., eds., Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues: Geological Society of America Special Paper 425, doi 10.1130/2007.2425(09).
97. Zoback, M.L., and Zoback, M.D., 1989, Tectonic stress field of the continental United States, in Pakiser, L.C., and Mooney, W.D., eds., Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States: Geological Society of America Memoir 172, p. 523-539.