Stress evolution and seismicity in the central-eastern United States: Insights from geodynamic modeling

Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

Volumn 425, Issue , 2007, Pages 149-166

  Li, Qingsong ^a   Liu, Mian ^a   Zhang, Qie ^a   Sandvol, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraplate earthquakes; Modeling; New Madrid seismic zone; Seismicity; Stress

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; GEODYNAMICS; MODELS; STRAIN ENERGY; STRESSES;

GEODYNAMIC MODELING; INTRAPLATE EARTHQUAKES; NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONES; NORTH AMERICAN PLATES; SEISMICITY; STRESS AND STRAIN; STRESS EVOLUTION; TECTONIC LOADING;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE; ENERGY BUDGET; NORTH AMERICAN PLATE; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC VELOCITY; SEISMIC ZONE; SEISMICITY; STRAIN; STRESS;

NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 60649106976     PISSN: 00721077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1130/2007.2425(11)     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, J.G., 1986, Seismic strain rates in the central and eastern United States: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 76, p. 273-290.
2. Becker, T.W., Hardebeck, J.L., and Anderson, G., 2005, Constraints on fault slip rates of the southern California plate boundary from GPS velocity and stress inversions: Geophysical Journal International, v. 160, p. 634-650, doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02528.x.
3. Bennett, R.A., Friedrich, A.M., and Furlong, K.P., 2004, Codependent histories of the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones from inversion of fault displacement rates: Geology, v. 32, p. 961-964, doi 10.1130/G20806.1.
4. Calais, E., Mattioli, G., Demets, C., Nocquet, J.M., Stein, S., Newman, A., and Rydelek, P., 2005, Tectonic strain in plate interiors?: Nature, v. 438, p. E9-E10, doi 10.1038/nature04428.
5. Chiu, J.M., Johnston, A.C., and Yang, Y.T., 1992, Imaging the active faults of the central New Madrid seismic zone using PANDA array data: Seismo- logical Research Letters, v. 63, p. 375-393.
6. Dewey, J.W., Hill, D.P., Ellsworth, W.L., and Engdahl, E.R., 1989, Earthquakes, faults, and the seismotectonic framework of the contiguous United States, in Pakiser, L.C., and Mooney, W.D., eds., Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Memoir 172, p. 541-576.
7. Diment, W.H., Urban, T.C., and Revetta, F.A., 1972, Some geophysical anomalies in the eastern United States, in Robertson, E.C., ed., The Nature of the Solid Earth: New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., p. 544-572.
8. Dixon, T.H., Mao, A., and Stein, S., 1996, How rigid is the stable interior of the North American plate?: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 23, p. 30353038, doi 10.1029/96GL02820.
9. Ervin, C.P., and McGinnis, L.D., 1975, Reelfoot rift; reactivated precursor to the Mississippi Embayment: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 1287-1295, doi 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1287:RRRPTT>2.0.CO;2.
10. Freed, A.M., and Lin, J., 2001, Delayed triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake by viscoelastic stress transfer: Nature, v. 411, p. 180-183, doi: 10.1038/35075548.
11. Gan, W., and Prescott, W.H., 2001, Crustal deformation rates in central and eastern U.S. inferred from GPS: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 28, p. 3733-3736, doi 10.1029/2001GL013266.
12. Goes, S., and van der Lee, S., 2002, Thermal structure of the North American uppermost mantle inferred from seismic tomography: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 107, p. 2050, doi 10.1029/2000JB000049.
13. Gomberg, J.S., 1993, Tectonic deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone; inferences from map view and cross-sectional boundary element models: Journal of Geophysical Research, ser. B, Solid Earth and Planets, v. 98, p. 6639-6664.
14. Grana, J.P., and Richardson, R.M., 1996, Tectonic stress within the New Madrid seismic zone: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 5445-5458, doi 10.1029/95JB03255.
15. Grollimund, B., and Zoback, M.D., 2001, Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone?: Geology, v. 29, p. 175-178, doi 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0175:DDTISI>2.0.CO;2.
16. Hearn, T.M., Rosca, A.C., and Fehler, M.C., 1994, Pn tomography beneath the southern Great Basin: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2187-2190, doi 10.1029/94GL02054.
17. Herrmann, R.B., 1979, Surface wave focal mechanisms for eastern North American earthquakes with tectonic implications: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 84, p. 3543-3552.
18. Hildenbrand, T.G., and Hendricks, J.D., 1995, Geophysical setting of the Reel- foot rift and relations between rift structures and the New Madrid seismic zone: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1538-E, p. E1-E30.
19. Hough, S.E., Armbruster, J.G., Seeber, L., and Hough, J.F., 2000, On the modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes: Journal of Geophysical Research, ser. B, Solid Earth and Planets, v. 105, p. 23, 839-23, 864, doi 10.1029/2000JB900110.
20. Hough, S.E., Bilham, R., Mueller, K., Stephenson, W., Williams, R., and Odum, J., 2005, Wagon loads of sand blows in White County, IL: Seismo- logical Research Letters, v. 76, p. 373-386.
21. James, T.S., and Bent, A.L., 1994, A comparison of eastern North American seismic strain-rates to glacial rebound strain-rates: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2127-2130, doi 10.1029/94GL01854.
22. Johnston, A.C., 1996, Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions; III. New Madrid 1811-1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755: Geophysical Journal International, v. 126, p. 314-344.
23. Johnston, A.C., and Kanter, L.R., 1990, Earthquakes in stable continental crust: Scientific American, v. 262, no. 3, p. 68-75.
24. Johnston, A.C., and Schweig, E.S., 1996, The enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811-1812: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 24, p. 339-384.
25. Jordan, T.H., 1979, Mineralogies, densities and seismic velocities of garnet lherzolites and their geophysical implications, in Boyd, F.R., and Meyer, H.O.A., eds., The mantle sample: Inclusions in kimberlites and other volcanics: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 1-14.
26. Kanamori, H., 1978, Quantification of earthquakes: Nature, v. 271, p. 411-414, doi 10.1038/271411a0.
27. Kelson, K.I., Simpson, G.D., Van Arsdale, R.B., Haraden, C.C., and Lettis, W.R., 1996, Multiple late Holocene earthquakes along the Reelfoot fault, central New Madrid seismic zone: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 6151-6170, doi 10.1029/95JB01815.
28. Kenner, S.J., and Segall, P., 2000, A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes; application to the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 289, p. 2329-2332, doi 10.1126/science.289.5488.2329.
29. King, G.C.P., Stein, R.S., and Lin, J., 1994, Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 84, p. 935-953.
30. Lay, T., and Wallace, T.C., 1995, Modern Global Seismology: San Diego, California, Academic Press, 521 p.
31. Li, Q., Liu, M., and Sandvol Eric, A., 2005, Stress evolution following the 1811-1812 large earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 32, doi 10.1029/2004GL022133.
32. Lin, J., and Stein, R.S., 2004, Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes, and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 109, doi 10.1029/2003JB002607.
33. Liu, L., and Zoback, M.D., 1997, Lithospheric strength and intraplate seis- micity in the New Madrid seismic zone: Tectonics, v. 16, p. 585-595, doi 10.1029/97TC01467.
34. Liu, L., Zoback, M.D., and Segall, P., 1992, Rapid intraplate strain accumulation in the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 257, p. 1666-1669, doi: 10.1126/science.257.5077.1666.
35. Lockner, D.A., and Okubo, P.G., 1983, Measurements of frictional heating in granite: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 88, p. 4313-4320.
36. Mueller, K., and Pujol, J., 2001, Three-dimensional geometry of the Reelfoot blind thrust: Implications for moment release and earthquake magnitude in the New Madrid seismic zone: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 91, p. 1563-1573, doi 10.1785/0120000276.
37. Mueller, K., Hough, S.E., and Bilham, R., 2004, Analysing the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks: Nature, v. 429, p. 284-288, doi 10.1038/nature02557.
38. Newman, A., Stein, S., Weber, J., Engeln, J., Mao, A., and Dixon, T., 1999, Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 284, p. 619-621, doi 10.1126/science.284.5414.619.
39. Nuttli, O.W., Bollinger, G.A., and Griffiths, D.W., 1979, On the relation between modified Mercalli intensity and body-wave magnitude: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 69, p. 893-909.
40. Obermeier, S.F., Gohn, G.S., Weems, R.E., Gelinas, R.L., and Rubin, M., 1985, Geologic evidence for recurrent moderate to large earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina: Science, v. 227, p. 408-411, doi 10.1126/science.227.4685.408.
41. Paige, C.C., and Saunders, M.A., 1982, LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares: ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, v. 8, p. 43-71, doi 10.1145/355984.355989.
42. Pollitz, F.F., Kellogg, L., and Buergmann, R., 2001a, Sinking mafic body in a reactivated lower crust; a mechanism for stress concentration at the New Madrid seismic zone: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 91, p. 1882-1897, doi 10.1785/0120000277.
43. Pollitz, F.F., Wicks, C., and Thatcher, W., 2001b, Mantle flow beneath a continental strike-slip fault; postseismic deformation after the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake: Science, v. 293, p. 1814-1818, doi 10.1126/ science.1061361.
44. Pratt, T.L., 1994, How old is the New Madrid seismic zone?: Seismological Research Letters, v. 65, p. 172-179.
45. Richardson, R.M., and Solomon, S.C., 1979, Tectonic stress in the plates: Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, v. 17, p. 981-1019.
46. Rydelek, P.A., and Sacks, I.S., 2001, Migration of large earthquakes along the San Jacinto fault; stress diffusion from 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 28, p. 3079-3082, doi 10.1029/2001GL013005.
47. Sbar, M.L., and Sykes, L.R., 1973, Contemporary compressive stress and seismicity in eastern North America; an example of intra-plate tectonics: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 84, p. 1861-1881, doi 10.1130/0016-7606(1973)84<1861:CCSASI>2.0.CO;2.
48. Schweig, E.S., and Ellis, M.A., 1994, Reconciling short recurrence intervals with minor deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone: Science, v. 264, p. 1308-1311, doi 10.1126/science.264.5163.1308.
49. Smalley, R., Ellis, M.A., Paul, J., and Van Arsdale, R.B., 2005a, Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USA: Nature, v. 435, p. 1088-1090, doi 10.1038/nature03642.
50. Smalley, R., Ellis, M.A., Paul, J., and Van Arsdale, R.B., 2005b, Tectonic strain in plate interiors? Reply: Nature, v. 438, p. E10, doi 10.1038/nature04429.
51. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A., and Dieterich, J.H., 1997, Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering: Geophysical Journal International, v. 128, p. 594-604.
52. Stein, S., and Newman, A., 2004, Characteristic and uncharacteristic earthquakes as possible artifacts: Applications to the New Madrid and Wabash seismic zones: Seismological Research Letters, v. 75, p. 173-187.
53. Stover, C.W., and Coffman, J.L., 1993, Seismicity of the United States, 15681989 (revised): U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, 418 p.
54. Street, R., and Lacroix, A., 1979, An empirical study of New England seismic- ity: 1727-1977: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 69, p. 159-175.
55. Stuart, W.D., Hildenbrand, T.G., and Simpson, R.W., 1997, Stressing of the New Madrid seismic zone by a lower crust detachment fault: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 102, p. 27, 623-27, 633, doi 10.1029/97JB02716.
56. Sykes, L.R., 1978, Intraplate seismicity, reactivation of preexisting zones of weakness, alkaline magmatism, and other tectonism postdating continental fragmentation: Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, v. 16, p. 621-688.
57. Talwani, P., and Cox, J., 1985, Paleoseismic evidence for recurrence of earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina: Science, v. 229, p. 379-381, doi 10.1126/science.229.4711.379.
58. Townend, J., and Zoback, M.D., 2000, How faulting keeps the crust strong: Geology, v. 28, p. 399-402, doi 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<399:HFKTCS>2.0. CO;2.
59. Turcotte, D.L., and Schubert, G., 1982, Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems: New York, John Wiley &Sons, 450 p.
60. Tuttle, M.P., Schweig, E.S., Sims, J.D., Lafferty, R.H., Wolf, L.W., and Haynes, M.L., 2002, The earthquake potential of the New Madrid seismic zone: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 92, p. 2080-2089, doi 10.1785/0120010227.
61. Van Arsdale, R., 2000, Displacement history and slip rate on the Reelfoot fault of the New Madrid seismic zone: Engineering Geology, v. 55, p. 219-226, doi 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00093-9.
62. Ward, S.N., 1998, On the consistency of earthquake moment rates, geological fault data, and space geodetic strain; the United States: Geophysical Journal International, v. 134, p. 172-186, doi 10.1046/j.1365- 246x.1998.00556.x.
63. Wu, P., and Johnston, P., 2000, Can deglaciation trigger earthquakes in N. America?: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 27, p. 1323-1326, doi: 10.1029/1999GL011070.
64. Zoback, M.D., Townend, J., and Grollimund, B., 2002, Steady-state failure equilibrium and deformation of intraplate lithosphere: International Geology Review, v. 44, p. 383-401.
65. Zoback, M.L., and Zoback, M.D., 1989, Tectonic stress field of the continental United States, in Pakiser, L.C., and Mooney, W.D., eds., Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Memoir 172, p. 523-539.