Democracy, scientific literacy and values in science education in the United States

The Re-Emergence of Values in Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 29-43

  Lehr, Jane L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71749116341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (2nd ed.). Yorkshire: Dialogos.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: AAAS. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www/project 2061.orgpublications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, D.C.: AAAS.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1996). Summary comparison of content between "National Science Education Standards" and "Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy" and "Science for all Americans". Washington, D.C.: AAAS.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2005). Project 2061 - having an impact. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/SRI
6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
7. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions in the classroom. New York and London: Routledge.
8. Bybee, R. W. (1997). A strategy for standards-based reform of science and mathematics education. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of mods and rockers. London: MacKibbon and Kee.
10. Collins, A. (1998). National science education standards: A political document. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 711-727.
11. Courdec, P. (1971). An antidote for anti-science. Impact of Science on Society, 21(2), 173-179.
12. Culliton, B. J. (1989). The dismal state of scientific literacy. Science, 243(4891), 600.
13. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
15. DeHart Hurd, P. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16.
16. Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (1997). Engineering selves: Hiring into a contested field of education. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropoligical interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 117-142). Santa Fe, NM: The SAR Press.
17. Downey, G. L. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among engineers. New York and London: Routledge.
18. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
19. Elam, M. (1997). National imaginations and systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technology, organizations, and institutions. London: Pinter Cassells.
20. Elam, M., & Bertillson, M. (2003). Consuming, engaging, and confronting science: The emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 233-251.
21. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 197-324.
22. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
24. Gore, J. (1990). What can we do for you! What can we do for you? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. Educational Foundations, 4(3), 5-26.
25. Graubard, S. R. (1983). Nothing to fear, much to do. Daedalus, 112(2), 231-248.
26. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York and London: Routledge.
27. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Science and society (Vol. 3rd Report: HL Paper 38). London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office
28. Irwin, A. (2001). Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 1-18.
29. Jenkins, E. W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales. In E. W. Jenkins (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. VI, pp. 11-39). Paris: UNESCO.
30. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310.
31. Kumashiro, K. (2002). Troubling education: Queer activism and anti-oppressive pedagogy. New York and London: RoutledgeFalmer.
32. Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94.
33. Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people: The origins of the school science curriculum in England. London: Allen and Unwin.
34. Lee, O. (1998). Current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents and implications for equity and assessment (No. 12). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
35. Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 83-115.
36. Lucena, J. C. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. Policymaking to create scientists and engineers from sputnik to the 'war against terrorism'. New York: University Press of America.
37. McCurdy, R. (1958). Toward a population literate in science. The Science Teacher, 25, 366-368, 408.
38. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
39. Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agnostic pluralism. Social Research, 66(3), 745-758.
40. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
41. Mullis, I. V., & Jenkins, L. B. (1988). The science report card: Elements of risk and recovery. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
42. National Academy of Science. (1986). Indicators of precollege education in science and mathematics: A preliminary review. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
43. National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http: //www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
44. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
45. National Science Board. (1986). Science and engineering indicators 1986. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
46. National Science Board. (1988). Science and engineering indicators 1988. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
47. National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. (1983). Educating Americans for the 21st century: A plan of action for improving mathematics, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
48. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1992). Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science (Vol. 1 The content core: A guide for curriculum designers). Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
49. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. Internationaljournal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
50. Norris, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
51. Ortner, M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for student voice in "liberatory" education: A feminist poststructuralist perspective. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74-89). New York and London: Routledge.
52. Osborne, J. F. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203-215.
53. Prewitt, K. (1983). Science literacy and democratic theory. Daedalus, 112(2), 49-64.
54. Recer, P. (1988, September 22). American school children perform poorly in science education, study says. The Associated Press.
55. Rockefeller Brothers Fund. (1958). The pursuit of excellence: Education and the future of America. In Prospect for America: Report number V of the Rockefeller panel reports. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
56. Roth, W-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York and London: RoutledgeFalmer.
57. Rudolph, J. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstructuion of science education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
58. Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 513-536.
59. Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guildford Press.
60. Shortland, M. (1988). Advocating science: Literacy and public understanding. Impact of Science on Society, 38(4), 305-316.
61. Siegfried, T. (1986, June 30). Scientific illiteracy: Public lacks grasp of technical issues, studies show. The Dallas Morning News, p. 8.
62. Task Force on Education for Economic Growth (1983). Action for excellence. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
63. Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed.), Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Department for External Studies, University of Oxford.
64. Thompson, K. (1998). Moral panics. New York and London: Routledge.
65. Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Federal Elementary and Secondary Education. (1983). Making the grade. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
66. st Sess. (2003).
67. Weld, E. N. (1987, May 17). For director of museum of science, there's a magic word: 'aha!' The Boston Globe.
68. Weld, E. N. (1988, February 21). How scientific should we get? Without scientifically literate citizens, democracy's in peril, educators say. The Boston Globe, p. 29.
69. Werner, L. M. (1987, January 30). Foundation opens 25 million drive on science education. The New York Times.
70. Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: DEMOS.
71. Wynne, B. (2005). Risk as globalizing "democratic" discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In M. Leach, I. Scoones & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement. London: Zed Books.
72. Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68(4), 411-419.
73. Zembylas, M. (2005). Science education: For citizenship and/or for social justice? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(6), 709-722.
74. Zucker, A. A., Young, V. M., & Luczak, J. M. (1996). Evaluation of the American Association for the Advancement of Science's Project 2061. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.