In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 50-55

  Choi, Donok ^a   Park, Youngbae ^b   Yoon, Yong San ^a   Masri, Bassam A ^c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b R and D Center   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Crack; Interface micromotion; Surface roughness; Total hip arthroplasty; Wear particle

Indexed keywords

CRACK INTERFACES; INTERFACE MICROMOTION; MICROMOTION; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; WEAR PARTICLES;

BONE; BONE CEMENT; CEMENTS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); METAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

CRACKS;

ARTICLE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MOTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 71649111899     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahmed A.M., Raab S., and Miller J.E. Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation. J. Orthopaed. Res. 2 2 (1984) 105-118
2. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., and Murray D.W. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81 1 (1999) 130-134
3. Archard J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surface. J. Appl. Phys. 24 8 (1953) 981-988
4. Bachus K.N., Bloebaum R.D., and Jones R.E. Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 366 (1999) 248-257
5. Buckwalter A.E., Callaghan J.J., Liu S.S., Pedersen D.R., Goetz D.D., Sullivan P.M., Leinen J.A., and Johnston R.C. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88 7 (2006) 1481-1485
6. Collis D.K., and Mohler C.G. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 84A 4 (2002) 586-592
7. Cook S.D., Thongpreda N., Anderson R.C., Thomas K.A., Haddad Jr. R.J., and Griffin C.D. Optimum pore size for bone cement fixation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 223 (1987) 296-302
8. Cristofolini L., Teutonico A.S., Monti L., Cappello A., and Toni A. Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs. J. Biomech. 36 11 (2003) 1603-1615
9. Crowninshield R.D., Jennings J.D., Laurent M.L., and Maloney W.J. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 355 (1998) 90-102
10. Dowson, D., Diab, M.M.E.-H., Gillis, B.J., Atkinson, J.R., 1984. Influence of counterface topography on the wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene under wet or dry conditions. In: Proc. Int. Symp. on Polymer Wear and its Control. American Chemical Society, St. Louis, USA.
11. Ebramzadeh E., Sangiorgio S.N., Longjohn D.B., Buhari C.F., and Dorr L.D. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86A 1 (2004) 106-115
12. Fornasier V.L., and Cameron H.U. The femoral stem/cement interface in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 116 (1976) 248-252
13. Fowler J.L., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., and Ling R.S. Experience with the exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 19 3 (1988) 477-489
14. Galante J.O., Rostoker W., and Doyle J.M. Failed femoral stems in total hip prostheses. A report of six cases. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 57 2 (1975) 230-236
15. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., and Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 141 (1979) 17-27
16. Howie D.W., Middleton R.G., and Costi K. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 80 4 (1998) 573-576
17. Lennon A.B., McCormack B.A., and Prendergast P.J. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Med. Eng. Phys. 25 10 (2003) 833-841
18. Ling R.S. The use of a collar and precoating on cemented femoral stems is unnecessary and detrimental. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 285 (1992) 73-83
19. Maher S.A., Prendergast P.J., and Lyons C.G. Measurement of the migration of a cemented hip prosthesis in an in vitro test. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 16 4 (2001) 307-314
20. Mann K.A., Miller M.A., Cleary R.J., Janssen D., and Verdonschot N. Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface. J. Orthop. Res. 26 6 (2008) 872-879
21. Nuno N., Groppetti R., and Senin N. Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 21 9 (2006) 956-962
22. Race A., Miller M.A., Ayers D.C., and Mann K.A. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. J. Biomech. 36 4 (2003) 489-496
23. Saikko V., Calonius O., and Keranen J. Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 57 4 (2001) 506-512
24. Speirs A.D., Slomczykowski M.A., Orr T.E., Siebenrock K., and Nolte L.P. Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 15 4 (2000) 248-255
25. Sporer S.M., Callaghan J.J., Olejniczak J.P., Goetz D.D., and Johnston R.C. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 81 4 (1999) 481-492
26. Stone M.H., Wilkinson R., and Stother I.G. Some factors affecting the strength of the cement-metal interface. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 71 2 (1989) 217-221
27. Vail T.P., Goetz D., Tanzer M., Fisher D.A., Mohler C.G., and Callaghan J.J. A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry. J. Arthroplasty 18 7 Suppl 1 (2003) 95-102
28. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 329 (1996) 326-336
29. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage. Biomaterials 19 19 (1998) 1773-1779
30. Wroblewski B.M. The mechanism of fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement. Int. Orthop. 3 2 (1979) 137-139
31. Wroblewski B.M. Fractured stem in total hip replacement. A clinical review of 120 cases. Acta Orthop. Scand. 53 2 (1982) 279-284
32. Yoon Y., Oxland T.R., Hodgson A.J., Duncan C.P., Masri B.A., and Choi D. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect. Clin. Biomech. 23 9 (2008) 1141-1147