A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 7 SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 95-102

  Vail, Thomas Parker ^a   Goetz, Devon ^b   Tanzer, Michael ^c   Fisher, David A ^d   Mohler, Craig G ^e   Callaghan, John J ^f  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Des Moines Orthopaedic Surgeons PC   (United States)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^d Orthopaedics Indianapolis   (United States)

^e Orthopedic Healthcare Northwest   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cemented hip stem; Lysis; Surface finish

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0141958922     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00298-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, et al: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1315, 1995
2. Bundy KJ, Penn RW: The effect of surface preparation on metal/bone cement interfacial strength. J Biomed Mater Res 21:793, 1987
3. Davies JP, Harris WH: Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. Orthopedics 17:171, 1994
4. Chang PB, Mann KA, Bartel DL: Cemented femoral stem performance: Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length. Clin Orthop 355:57, 1998
5. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B: Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 355:103, 1998
6. Crowninshield RD, Tolbert JR: Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well-fixed femoral stems. J Biomed Mater Res 17:819, 1983
7. Collis DK, Mohler CG: Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop 355:113, 1998
8. Crawford RW, Evans M, Ling RS, et al: Fluid flow around model femoral components of differing surface finishes. Acta Orthop Scand 70:589, 1999
9. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, et al: Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop 355:90, 1998
10. Loudon JR: Femoral prosthetic subsidence after low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 211:134, 1986
11. Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, et al: Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:33, 1991
12. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, et al: Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:966, 1990
13. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
14. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K: Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:573, 1998
15. Schmalzried TP, Zahiri CA, Woolson ST: The significance of stem-cement loosening of grit-blasted femoral components. Orthopedics 23:1157, 2000
16. Meding JB, Nassif JM, Ritter MA: Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:928, 2000
17. Gardiner RC, Hozack WJ: Failure of the cement-bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? J Bone Joint Surg Br 76: 49, 1994
18. Dowd JE, Cha CW, Trakru S, et al: Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis: 4- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop 355:123, 1998
19. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH: Improved cementing technique and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: a 12 year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 385, 1992
20. Mulroy WF, Estok D, Harris WH: Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation cement techniques. A 15 year average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1845, 1995
21. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, et al: The long term results of a titanium femoral component. 17th Annual Mid-America Orthopaedic Meeting, 1999
22. Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, et al: Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:616, 1993
23. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC: The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up: The results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:961, 1993
24. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF: Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:171, 2002
25. Joshi RP, Eftekhar NS, McMahon DJ, Nercessian OA: Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty: A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:585, 1998
26. Collis DK, Mohler CG: Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop 355:113, 1998
27. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, et al: The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis: A study of patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 481, 1999