Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 366, Issue , 1999, Pages 248-257

  Bachus, Kent N ^a   Bloebaum, Roy D ^a,b   Jones, Richard E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Center for Joint Restoration   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; JOINT STABILITY; MALE; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0032879877     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199909000-00032     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bloebaum RD, Ota DT, Skedros JG, Mantas JP: Comparison of human and canine external femoral morphologies in the context of total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1149-1159, 1993.
2. Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, et al: Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:33-37, 1991.
3. Charnley J: Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice. New York, Springer Verlag 330-331, 1979.
4. Charnley J, Kettlewell J: The elimination of slip between prothesis and femur. J Bone Joint Surg 47B:56-60, 1965.
5. Dorr LD, Faugere M-C, Mackel AM, et al: Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231-242, 1993.
6. Dujardin FH, Mollard R, Toupin JM, et al: Micromotion, fit, and fill of custom made femoral stems designed with an automated process. Clin Orthop 325:276-289, 1996.
7. Estok II DM, Harris WH: Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques. An average 11.7 year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 299:190-202, 1994.
8. Harris WH: The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty. One surgeon's perspective. Clin Orthop 274:6-11, 1992.
9. Harris WH: Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop 274:120-123, 1992.
10. Harris WH: The Case for Cemented Fixation of the Femur in Every Patient. In Schafer M (ed). Instructional Course Lectures. Vol 43. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 367-371, 1994.
11. Kärrholm J, Frech W, Nilsson K-G, Snorrason F: Increased metal release from cemented femoral components made of titanium alloy. 19 hip prostheses followed with radiostereometry (RSA). Acta Orthop Scand 65:599-604, 1984.
12. Kelley SS, Fitzgerald Jr RH, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM: A prospective randomized study of a collar versus a collarless femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop 294:114-122, 1993.
13. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD: Comparison of human, primate, and canine femora: Implications for biomaterials testing in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 40:475-189, 1998.
14. Linder L: Implant stability, histology, RSA and wear-More critical questions are needed. Acta Orthop Scand 65:654-658, 1994.
15. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, et al: Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clin Orthop 249:129-140, 1989.
16. Markolf KL, Amstutz HC, Hirschowitz DL: The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micromovement. J Bone Joint Surg 62A:1315-1323, 1980.
17. Martin RB, Atkinson PJ: Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. J Biomech 10:223-231, 1977.
18. McLeish RD, Charnley J: Abduction forces in the one-legged stance. J Biomech 3:191-209, 1970.
19. Oh I, Carlson CF, Tomford WW, Harris WH: Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using a methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:608-613, 1978.
20. Oh I, Harris WH: Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:75-85, 1978.
21. Rickards RC, Duncan CP: The collar-calcar contact controversy. Orthop Trans 9:562, 1985.
22. Ruff C: Structural changes in the lower limb bones with aging at Pecos Pueblo. PhD Thesis. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania 1981.
23. Ruff CB, Hayes WC: Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. Science 217:945-948, 1982.
24. Ruff CB, Hayes WC: Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae - A biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthrop 60:359-381, 1983.
25. Ruff CB.,Hayes WC: Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae - A biomechanical investigation: II. Sex, age, and side differences. Am J Phys Anthrop 60:383-400, 1983.
26. Ruff C, Hayes W: Age changes in geometry and mineral content of the lower limb bones. Ann Biomed Eng 12:573-584, 1984.
27. Ruff CB, Hayes WC: Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 6:886-896, 1988.
28. Ryd L: Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. Clin Orthop 276:56-65, 1992.
29. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenstr'm A, Selvik G: Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components. The relationship between prosthetic position and micromotion. Clin Orthop 251:189-197, 1990.
30. Thomas BJ, Salvati EA, Small RD: The CAD hip arthroplasty. Five to ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:640-646, 1986.
31. Wroblewski BM: 15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 211:30-35, 1986.