Mechano-biology as an optimization principle for biological tissue engineering

Virtual and Physical Prototyping

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 183-193

  Liebschner, A M A K ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological tissue engineering; Biomechanical loading; Computer aided tissue engineering; Mechano biology; Optimization principle

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; BIOMECHANICAL LOADING; COMPUTER-AIDED TISSUE ENGINEERING; MECHANO-BIOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION PRINCIPLE;

BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING; JOB ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; RAPID PROTOTYPING; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 71449126024     PISSN: 17452759     EISSN: 17452767     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17452750903438684     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adachi, T., Osako, Y., Tanaka, M., Hojo, M. and Hollister, S.J., 2006. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 27 (21), 3964-3972.
2. Bikle, D.D. and Halloran, B.P., 1999. The response of bone to unloading. Journal of Bone Mineral Metabolism, 17 (4), 233-244.
3. Bucklen, B., Wettergreen, M., Heinkenschloss, M. and Liebschner, M., 2005. Surface-based scaffold design: A mechanobiological approach. IMECE 2005, Advances in Bio-Manufacturing. IMECE2005-81985.
4. Bucklen, B.S., 2008. "Investigation of Surface Mechanical Environment a as an Optimization Criterion for Improved Tissue Engineering Scaffolds", Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University.
5. Butler, D.L., Goldstein, S.A. and Guilak, F., 2000. Functional tissue engineering: The role of biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 122 (6), 570-575.
6. Carter, D.R., Orr, T.E. and Fyhrie, D.P., 1989. Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. Journal of Biomechanics, 22 (3), 231-244.
7. Cowin, S.C., 1976. Bone remodelling I: Theory of adaptive elasticity. Journal of Elasticity, 6, 313-326.
8. Droppert, P.M., 1990. The effects of microgravity on the skeletal system a review. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 43 (1), 19-24.
9. Duncan, R.L. and Turner, C.H., 1995. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcified Tissue International, 57 (5), 344-358.
10. Frost, H.M., 2003. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anatomic Records A Discoveries in Molecular Cell Evolution and Biology, 275 (2), 1081-1101.
11. Frost, H.M., 2004. Chapter 5: The Skeleton's Mechanical Usage Window. In: The Utah Paradigm of Skeletal Physiology. Greece. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions, 1, 224-241.
12. Hollister, S.J., Kikuchi, N. and Goldstein, S.A., 1993. Do bone ingrowth processes produce a globally optimized structure? Journal of Biomechanics, 26 (4-5), 391-407.
13. Huiskes, R., Weinans, H., Grootenboer, H.J., Dalstra, M., Fudala, B. and Slooff, T.J., 1987. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 20 (11-12), 1135-1150.
14. Hutmacher, D.W., 2000. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21 (24), 2529-2543.
15. Jee, W., 2001. Integrated bone tissue physiology: Anatomy and physiology. In: Bone Biomechanics Handbook. S.C. Cowin, ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press LLC: (1)1 (1)68.
16. Kabel, J., van Rietbergen, B., Dalstra, M., Odgaard, A. and Huiskes, R., 1999. The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 32 (7), 673-680.
17. Lanyon, L.E., Hampson, W.G., Goodship, A.E. and Shah, J.S., 1975. Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 46 (2), 256-268.
18. Morgan, E.F., Bayraktar, H.H. and Keaveny, T.M., 2003. Trabecular bone modulus density relationships depend on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics, 36 (7), 897-904.
19. Mullender, M.G. and Huiskes, R., 1995. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 13 (4), 503-512.
20. Perren, S.M., 1979. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 138, 175-196.
21. Rubin, C.T. and Lanyon, L.E., 1987. Kappa Delta Award paper. Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 5 (2), 300-310.
22. Ruimerman, R., Van Rietbergen, B., Hilbers, P. and Huiskes, R., 2005. The effects of trabecular-bone loading variables on the surface signaling potential for bone remodeling and adaptation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 33 (1), 71-78.
23. Sikavitsas, V.I., Bancroft, G.N., Lemoine, J.J., Liebschner, M.A., Dauner, M. and Mikos, A.G., 2005. Flow perfusion enhances the calcified matrix deposition of marrow stromal cells in biodegradable nonwoven fiber mesh scaffolds. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 33 (1), 63-70.
24. Turner, C.H., 1992. Functional determinants of bone structure: beyond Wolff's law of bone transformation. Bone, 13 (6), 403-409.
25. van der Meulen, M.C. and Huiskes, R., 2002. Why mechanobiology? A survey article. Journal of Biomechanics, 35 (4), 401-414.
26. Wettergreen, M., Bucklen, B., Sun, W. and Liebschner, M., 2005. Computer-aided tissue engineering in whole bone replacement treatment. IMECE 2005, Advances in Bio-Manufacturing, IMECE2005-82000.
27. Wolff, J., 1892. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin, Hirschwald Verlag.