Evolution of hierarchical floral resource allocation associated with mating system in an animal-pollinated hermaphroditic herb, Trillium camschatcense (Trilliaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 134-141

  Tomimatsu, Hiroshi ^a,b   Ohara, Masashi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attractive structure; Flower number; Geographical variation; Resource allocation hierarchy; Self fertilization; Sex allocation theory; Trade off

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; HERB; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; MELANTHIACEAE; TRILLIUM; TRILLIUM CAMSCHATCENSE;

EID: 31944444015     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: 00029122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.93.1.134     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki [eds.], Second international symposium on information theory, 267-281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
2. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. D. HARDER, AND A. C. WORLEY. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 351: 1271-1280.
3. BRUNET, J. 1992. Sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants. Trends in Ecology and Evoution 7: 79-84.
4. CAMPBELL, D. R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 227-232.
5. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution 41: 948-968.
6. CRUDEN, R. W., AND D. L. LYON. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems. Oecologia 66: 299-306.
7. CUMARASWAMY, A., AND K. S. BAWA. 1989. Sex allocation and mating systems in pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (Fabaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 168: 59-69.
8. FUKUDA, I., Y. HIRAIZUMI, T. NARISE, AND M. KURABAYASHI. 1960. Evolution and variation in Trillium. VI. Migrations among natural populations of T. kamtschaticum across the Ishikari depression. Evolution 14: 224-231.
9. GALEN, C. 1993. Costs of reproduction in Polemonium viscosum: phenotypic and genetic approaches. Evolution 47: 1073-1079.
10. GOOD-AVILA, S. V., AND A. G. STEPHENSON. 2002. The inheritance of modifiers conferring self-fertility in the partially self-incompatible perennial, Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae). Evolution 56: 263-272.
11. HARDER, L. D., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512-515.
12. DE JONG, G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocations of a resource. Functional Ecology 7: 75-83.
13. KLINKHAMER, P. G. L., AND T. J. DE JONG. 1997. Size-dependent allocation to male and female reproduction. In F. A. Bazzaz and J. Grace [eds.], Plant resource allocation, 211-229. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
14. KURABAYASHI, M. 1957. Evolution and variation in Trillium. IV. Chromosome variation in natural populations of Trillium kamtschaticum Pall. Japanese Journal of Botany 16: 1-45.
15. LABARBERA, N. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 97-117.
16. LLOYD, D. G. 1987. Allocations to pollen, seeds and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilization plants. Functional Ecology 1: 83-89.
17. LOVETT DOUST, J., AND P. J. CAVERS. 1982. Biomass allocation in hermaphrodite flowers. Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 2530-2534.
18. MORGAN, M. T., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1989. Reproductive correlates of mating system variation in Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2: 183-203.
19. VAN NOORDWIJK, A. J., AND G. DE JONG. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. American Naturalist 128: 137-142.
20. OHARA, M., AND S. KAWANO. 1986a. Life history studies on the genus Trillium (Liliaceae). I. Reproductive biology of four Japanese species. Plant Species Biology 1: 35-45.
21. OHARA, M., AND S. KAWANO. 1986b. Life history studies on the genus Trillium (Liliaceae). IV. Stage class structures and spatial distribution of four Japanese species. Plant Species Biology 1: 147-161.
22. OHARA, M., K. OKAZAKI, AND S. KAWANO. 1991. Predominant inbreeding and resource limitation in four Japanese Trillium species. Miyabea 1: 21-30.
23. OHARA, M., H. TAKEDA, Y. OHNO, AND Y. SHIMAMOTO. 1996. Variations in the breeding system and the population genetic structure of Trillium kamtschaticum (Liliaceae). Heredity 76: 476-484.
24. OHASHI, K., AND T. YAHARA. 1998. Effects of variation in flower number on pollinator visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 219-224.
25. ORNDUFF, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18: 121-133.
26. PARKER, I. M., R. R. NAKAMURA, AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1995. Reproductive allocation and the fitness consequences of selfing in two sympatric species of Epilobium (Onagraceae) with contrasting mating systems. American Journal of Botany 82: 1007-1016.
27. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
28. RITLAND, C., AND K. RITLAND. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 1731-1739.
29. SAKAI, S. 1993. Allocation to attractive structures in animal-pollinated flowers. Evolution 47: 1711-1720.
30. SAKAI, S. 2000. Size-number trade-off and allocation to flower production in animal-pollinated flowers. Plant Species Biology 15: 261-268.
31. SAKAI, S., AND Y. HARADA. 2001. Sink-limitation and the size-number trade-off of organs: production of organs using a fixed amount of reserves. Evolution 55: 467-476.
32. SAS INSTITUTE. 1999. SAS version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
33. SATO, H., AND T. YAHARA. 1999. Trade-offs between flower number and investment to a flower in selfing and outcrossing varieties of Impatiens hypophylla (Balsaminaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1699-1707.
34. SCHOEN, D. J. 1982. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant. Oecologia 53: 255-257.
35. SILVERTOWN, J., AND M. DODD. 1999. The demographic cost of reproduction and its consequences in Balsam fir (Abies balsamea). American Naturalist 154: 321-332.
36. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. Freeman, New York, New York.
37. STEBBINS, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York.
38. TOMIMATSU, H., AND M. OHARA. 2002. Effects of forest fragmentation on seed production of the understory herb Trillium camschatcense. Conservation Biology 16: 1277-1285.
39. TOMIMATSU, H., AND M. OHARA. 2003. Floral visitors of Trillium camschatcense (Trilliaceae) in fragmented forests. Plant Species Biology 18: 123-127.
40. VENABLE, D. L. 1996. Packaging and provisioning in plant reproduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 351: 1319-1329.
41. WORLEY, A. C., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54: 1533-1545.
42. WORLEY, A. C., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2001. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): genetic correlations between flower size and number. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 469-481.
43. WORLEY, A. C., D. HOULE, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2003. Consequences of hierarchical allocation for the evolution of life-history traits. American Naturalist 161: 153-167.
44. WRIGHT, S. I., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1999. Size-dependent gender modification in a hermaphroditic perennial herb. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 266: 225-232.