On the acceptability of incompatible arguments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4724 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 247-258

  Kaci, Souhila ^a   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^b   Weydert, Emil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; SEMANTICS;

ACYCLIC ATTACK; INCOMPATIBLE ARGUMENTS;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

EID: 38049186799     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 29(1), 125-169 (2002)
2. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34, 197-216 (2002)
3. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., LeBerre, D.: Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In: 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAF96), pp. 400-403 (1996)
4. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Perrussel, L.: An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR'00), pp. 59-67 (2000)
5. Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
6. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge base. In: 9th Int. Conf. on Uncertainty in AI (UAI'93), pp. 411-419 (1993)
7. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128, 203-235 (2001)
8. Bochman, A.: Propositional Argumentation and Causal Reasoning. In: 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'05), pp. 388-393 (2005)
9. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Symmetric argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 317-328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321-357 (1995)
11. Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Acyclic Argumentation: Attack = Conflict + Preference. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006), pp. 725-726 (2006)
12. Pollock, J.L.: Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11(4), 481-518 (1987)
13. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorties. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7, 25-75 (1997)
14. Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53, 125-157 (1992)
15. Stolzenburg, F., Garcia, A.J., Chesñevar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13(1), 87-113 (2003)