Network politics in transatlantic homeland security cooperation

Perspectives on European Politics and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 560-581

  Pawlak, Patryk ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Border protection; Bureaucrats; Data protection; Homeland security; Network politics; Networks; Transatlantic relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949084170     PISSN: 15705854     EISSN: 15680258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15705850903314833     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. American Civil Liberties Union (2001a) ACLU Deeply Disappointed With Passage of Anti-Terrorism Bill; Decries Deeply Flawed Legislative Process, 24 October. Available at http://www.aclu.org/natsec/gen/12463prs20011024.html (accessed 15 June 2009).
2. American Civil Liberties Union (2001b) ACLU Says Congress Should Treat Administration Proposal Carefully; Says Many Provisions Go Far Beyond Anti-Terrorism Needs, 20 September. Available at http://www.aclu.org/natsec/gen/12502prs20010920.html (accessed 15 June 2009).
3. American Civil Liberties Union (2001c) "Don't Let Terrorism Rewrite the Constitution," New ACLU Advertisement Urges, 1 October. Available at http://www.aclu.org/natsec/emergpowers/14394prs20011001.html (accessed 15 June 2009).
4. Andreas, P. (2002) Re-bordering of America after 11 September, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 8(2), pp. 195-202.
5. Argomaniz, J. (2009) When the EU is 'norm-taker': The Passenger Name Records agreement and the EU's internalisation of US border security norms, Journal of European Integration, 31(1), pp. 119-136.
6. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2001) Opinion 10/2001 on the Need for a Balanced Approach in the Fight Against Terrorism, 0901/02/EN/Final, WP 53, 14 December.
7. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2002) Opinion 6/2002 on Transmission of Passenger Manifest Information and Other Data from Airlines to the United States, 11647/02/EN, WP 66, 24 October.
8. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2003) Opinion 4/2003 on the Level of Protection Ensured in the US for the Transfer of Passengers' Data, 11070/03/EN, WP 78, 13 June.
9. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2006) Opinion Adopted from the Article 29 Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data, Brussels, 14 June.
10. Balzacq, T. & Carrera, S. (2005) The EU's Fight Against International Terrorism - Security Problems, Insecure Solutions, CEPS Policy Brief, No. 80 (July).
11. Balzacq, T. & Carrera, S. (Eds) (2006) Security Versus Freedom?: A Challenge for Europe's Future (Aldershot: Ashgate).
12. Bermann, G., Herdegen, M. & Lindseth, P. (2001) Transnational Regulatory Cooperation: Legal Problems and Politial Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
13. Bigo, D. & Tsoukala, A. (Eds) (2006) Illiberal Practices in Liberal Regimes: The (in)Security Games (Paris: L'Harmattan).
14. Bjorkdahl, A. (2005) Norm-maker and norm-taker: Exploring the normative influence of the EU in Macedonia, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(2), pp. 257-278.
15. Borzel, T. A. (1998) Organizing Babylon - On the different conceptions of policy networks, Public Administration, 76(2), pp. 253-273.
16. Brass, D. J. & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992) Centrality and power in organizations, in: N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, pp. 191-215 (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).
17. Checkel, J. T. (2001) Why comply? Social learning and European identity change, International Organization, 55(3), pp. 553-588.
18. Council of the European Union (2000) European union priorities and policy objectives for external relations in the field of justice and home affairs, 7653/00, 6 June.
19. Council of the European Union (2001a) Joint Declaration by the Heads of State and Government of the European Union, the President of the European Parliament, the President of the European Commission, and the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, 14 September.
20. Council of the European Union (2001b) Joint EU-US Ministerial Statement on Combating Terrorism, 12109/01, Brussels, 24 September.
21. Council of the European Union (2001c) Special meeting of the General Affairs Council, 11795/01 (Presse 318), 12 September.
22. Council of the European Union (2003) New Legal Requirements by US on 'Advanced Passenger Information System' (APIS) and 'Passenger Name Records' (PNR). Exchange of Views on the Position of the Member States. Discussion by Working Party on Aviation on 28 January 2003, 6051/03, Brussels, 4 February.
23. Council of the European Union (2004) Council Decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of PNR data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Official Journal of the European Union. L183/83, 20 May.
24. Council of the European Union (2005) JHA Council Declaration on the EU Response to the London Bombings, 11158/1/05 REV 1, 13 July.
25. De Hert, P. & Bellanova, R. (Eds) (2009) Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A System Still to be Fully Developed? Briefing Paper PE 410.692, March. Available at www.europarl.europa.eu (accessed 15 June 2009).
26. Department of Homeland Security (2002) Securing America's Borders. Fact Sheet: Border Security, 25 January 2002. Available at www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0052.shtm (accessed 15 October 2009).
27. Department of Homeland Security (2004) Undertakings of the Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 11 May.
28. Djelic, M. L. & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds) (2007) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
29. European Commission (2003) A Letter of the European Commissioner Frits Bolkenstein to the US Secretary of Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, 11 September. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/oct/Blokestein%20to%20Ridge%2011%20Sept.pdf (accessed 15 June 2009).
30. European Commission (2004) Commission Decision of 14 May 2004 on the Adequate Protection of Personal Data Contained in the Passenger Name Record of Air Passengers Transferred to the United States' Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 2004/535/EC, L 235, 06.07.2004.
31. European Commission (2007) Communication from the Commission - Annual Policy Strategy for 2008, COM(2007) 65 final, 21 February 2007.
32. European Commission (2008a) A Comprehensive Vision for an Integrated European Border Management System for the 21st Century, Press release, IP/08/215, 13 February.
33. European Commission (2008b) Commission Communication on Preparing the Next Steps in Border Management in the European Union, COM(2008) 69 final, 13 February 2008.
34. European Commission (2008c) Commission Staff Working Document. Accompanying Document to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Preparing the Next Steps in Border Management in the European Union. Impact Assessment, SEC(2008) 153, 13 February.
35. European Council (1999) Presidency Conclusions. Tampere European Council, Bulletin of the European Union, 10-1999.
36. European Court of Justice (2005) Opinion of the Advocate General in Cases C-317/04 and C.318/04, Luxembourg, 22.11.2005.
37. European Court of Justice (2006) Case European Parliament v Council of the European Union and v European Commission, Case C-317/04 and C-318/04, 30 May.
38. European Parliament (2003a) Motion for a Resolution Further to the Commission Statement Pursuant to Rule 37(2) of the Rules of Procedure on behalf of the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs on Transfer of Personal Data by Airlines to the US Immigration Service, B5-0000/2003, 6 March.
39. European Parliament (2003b) Transmission of Personal Data by Airlines in the Case of Transatlantic Flights. European Parliament Resolution on Transfer of Personal Data by Airlines in the Case of Transatlantic Flights: State of Negotiations with the USA, P5_TA-PROV20P5_TA-PROV(2003)0429.
40. European Parliament (2004a) A Letter from the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Elmar Brok to the Chair of the Citizens' Freedoms and Rights Committee Mr. Hernandez Mollar, 18 March. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/mar/elmarbrok-let.pdf (accessed 15 June 2009).
41. European Parliament (2004b) A Letter from the President of the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles to the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, 9 June. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2006/jun/eu-usa-pnr-borrell-letter2.pdf (accessed 15 June 2009).
42. European Parliament (2004c) European Parliament Resolution on the Draft Commission Decision Noting the Adequate Level of Protection Provided for Personal Data Contained in the Passenger Name Records (PNRs) Transferred to the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 2004/2011(INI), P5_TA-PROV(2004)0245.
43. European Parliament (2006) Statement of Pat Cox, the President of the European Parliament with Regard to the Transfer of the PNR Data to the US Authorities, 25 May 2004. Available at www.statewatch.com (accessed 15 June 2009).
44. Franz, H.-J. (1991) Interorgnizational policy coordination: Arrangements of shared government, in: F.-X. Kaufmann (Ed.) The Public Sector - Challenges for Coordination and Learning, pp. 469-499 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
45. Garand, J. C., Parkhurst, C. T. & Jourdan Seoud, R. (1991) Bureaucrats, policy attitudes, and political behaviour: Extensions of bureau voting model of government growth, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), pp. 177-212.
46. Gnyawali, D. R. & Madhavan, R. (2001) Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26(3), pp. 431-445.
47. Granovetter, M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360-1380.
48. Granovetter, M. S. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510.
49. Guild, E. (2003) International terrorism and EU immigration, asylum and border policy: The unexpected victims of 11 September 2001, European Foreign Affairs Review, 8(3), pp. 331-346.
50. Guild, E. & Geyer, F. (Eds) (2008) Security Versus Justice?: Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union (Aldershot: Ashgate).
51. Guild, E., Carrera, S. & Geyer, F. (2008) The Commissions new border package. Does it take us one step closer to a 'cyber-fortress Europe'?, CEPS Policy Brief, 154.
52. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000) Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 203-215.
53. Hall, P. A. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics, 25(3), pp. 275-296.
54. Ikenberry, G. J. & Kupchan, C. (1990) Socialization and hegemonic power, International Organization, 44(33), pp. 283-315.
55. International Chamber of Commerce, European Industry Association, Unice & Intug (2003) Common Industry Statement on Storage of Traffic Data for Law Enforcement Purposes, 4 June. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/jun/08.htm (accessed 15 June 2009).
56. Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. (1974) Transgovernmental relations and international organisations, World Politics, 27(1), pp. 39-62.
57. Koslowski, R. (2004) International Cooperation to Create Smart Borders (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars).
58. Kraatz, M. S. (1998) Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to enviornmental change, Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), pp. 621-643.
59. Lazer, D. (2001) Regulatory interdependence and international governance, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), pp. 474-492.
60. Lazer, D. & Mayer-Schonberger, V. (2002) Governing networks: Telecommunication deregulation in Europe and the United States, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 27(3), pp. 819-851.
61. Mcpherson, J. M. & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987) Homophily in voluntary organisations, American Sociological Review, 52, pp. 370-379.
62. Mcpherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, pp. 415-444.
63. Meier, K. J. & O'Toole, L. J. (2006) Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
64. Nayyar, P. R. & Bantel, K. A. (1994) Competitive agility: A source of competitive advantage based on speed and variety, Advances in Strategic Management, 10, pp. 193-222.
65. Nicolaidis, K. & Howse, R. (2001) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (New York: Oxford University Press).
66. Niskanen, W. A. (1994) Bureaucracy and Public Economics (Aldershot: E. Elgar).
67. Noxolo, P. & Huysmans, J. (Eds) (2009) Security and Insecurity: Community, Citizenship and the 'War on Terror' (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
68. Nye, J. & Keohane, R. O. (Eds) (1972) Transnational Relations and World Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
69. O'Toole, L. J. (2000) Different public managements? Implications of structural context in hierarchies and networks, in: J. L. Brudney, L. J. O'Toole & H. G. Rainey (Eds) Advancing Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice, pp. 19-32 (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
70. Pawlak, P. (2007) From hierarchy to networks: Transatlantic governance of homeland security, Journal of Global Change and Governance, 1(1), pp. 1-22.
71. Pawlak, P. (2009) The external dimension of Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Hijacker or hostage of cross-pillarisation?, Journal of European Integration, 31(1), pp. 25-44.
72. Peterson, J. & O'Toole, L. J. (2001) Federal governance in the United States and the European Union: A policy network perspective, in: K. Nicolaidis & R. Howse (Eds) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Visions of Governance in the United States and the European Union, pp. 300-334 (New York: Oxford University Press).
73. Provan, K. G. & Kenis, P. (2007) Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness, Journal of Public Administration Research, 18, pp. 229-252.
74. Riccucci, N. (1995) Unsung Heroes: Federal Execucrats Making a Difference (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
75. Ring, P. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganisational relationships, Academy of Management Journal, 19(1), pp. 90-118.
76. Rinquist, E. (1993) Does regulation matter? Evaluating the effects of state air pollution control programs, Journal of Politics, 55(4), pp. 1022-1045.
77. Risse-Kappen, T. (1995) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structure, and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
78. Rogers, E. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).
79. Scharpf, F. W. (1993) Coordination in hierarchies and networks, in: F. W. Scharpf (Ed.) Games in Hierarchies and Networks, pp. 125-165 (Frankfurt a. Main: Campus Verlag).
80. Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Introduction: The problem-solving capacity in multi-level governance, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), pp. 520-538.
81. Scharpf, F. W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
82. Sedelmeier, U. (2002) Sectoral dynamics of EU enlargement: Advocacy, access and alliances in a composite policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), pp. 627-649.
83. Slaughter, A. M. (2004) A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
84. Smith, K. G. & Grimm, C. M. (1991) A communication-information model of competitive response timing, Journal of Management, 17, pp. 5-23.
85. Statewatch (2003a) EU: Form of Deal on Handing Over Passenger Data to USA in Doubt. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/nov/16pnrnov.htm (accessed 15 June 2009).
86. Statewatch (2003b) How US Customs Bounced the European Commission into a Quick Decision. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/mar/02usdata2.htm (accessed 15 June 2009).
87. Statewatch (2004) EU-US PNR: Council to Ignore Parliament and Go Ahead with 'Deal'. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/may/06eu-us-nr-deal.htm (accessed 15 June 2009).
88. Stevens, A. & Stevens, H. (2001) Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union (New York: Palgrave).
89. Stone, D. (2002) Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making (New York: W. W. Norton & Company).
90. The United States Mission to the European Union (2004) U.S, EU Discuss Transportation, Border Security, Brussels, 27 April. Available at http://useu.usmission.gov/Article.asp?ID=3B93FC1F-F30E-467D-A287-54777BE14CE7) (accessed 15 June 2009).
91. The White House (2001) Statement by the President George W. Bush in His Address to the Nation, Office of the Press Secretary, 11 September.
92. The White House (2002) National Strategy for Homeland Security (Washington, DC: Office for Homeland Security).
93. Tsoukala, A. (2008) Security, risk and human rights: A vanishing relationship?, CEPS Special Report, September.
94. Valente, T. W. (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press).
95. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
96. Wolf, P. J. (1997) Why must we reinvent the federal government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(3), pp. 353-388.