The external dimension of the area of freedom, security and justice: hijacker or hostage of cross-pillarization?

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-44

  Pawlak, Patryk ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cross pillarization; external dimension of JHA; institutional politics; new institutionalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050709013     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330802503825     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allison, G.T., and Halperin, M., 1972. Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics, 24(spring): 40–79.
2. Allison, G.T., and Zelikow, P., 1999. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York: Longman.
3. Bendiek, A., 2006. Cross-pillar security regime building in the European Union: Effects of the European Security Strategy of December 2003. European Integration Online Papers.
4. Bulmer, S.J., 1998. New institutionalism and the governance of the Single European Market. Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (3): 365–86.
5. Christiansen, T., 2001. Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: Towards coherent governance?. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (5): 747–69.
6. Cini, M., and McGowan, L., 1998. Competition policy in the European Union, London: Macmillan.
7. Council of the European Union. 1998. Joint Action of 29 June 1998 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, establishing a mechanism for collective evaluation of the enactment, application and effective implementation by the applicant countries of the acquis of the European Union in the field of Justice and Home Affairs. Official Journal of the EU,: 8–9. L191 (July 7)
8. Council of the European Union. Justice and home affairs 2203rd Council meeting, 11281/99. October4.
9. Council of the European Union. 2000. “ European Union priorities and policy objectives for external relations in the field of justice and home affairs, 7653/00 ”. June 6
10. Council of the European Union. 2001. “ Preparing the Council for the Enlargement, 9518/01 ”. June 7
11. Council of the European Union. 2004. Council Decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of PNR data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection. Official Journal of the EU, L183/83 (May 20)
12. Council of the European Union. 2005. “ A strategy for the external dimension of JHA: Global freedom, security and justice, 15446/05 ”. December 6
13. Court of First Instance. 2005a. Case T 306/01 Ahmed Ali Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and European Commission. Official Journal of the EU, C281 (November 12)
14. Court of First Instance. 2005b. Case T-315/01 Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council of the European Union and European Commission. Official Journal of the EU, C281 (November 12)
15. Cram, L., 1994. The European Commission as a multi-organisation: Social policy and IT policy in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 1 (2): 195–218.
16. Cremona, M., 2006. “ External relations of the EU and the member states: Competence, mixed agreements, international responsibility, and effects of international law ”. In EUI Working Papers Law No. 2006/22
17. Denza, E., 2002. The intergovernmental pillars of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
18. DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W., 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
19. Eeckhout, P., 2004. External relations of the European Union: Legal and constitutional foundations, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
20. European Commission. 2003. “ Communication from the Commission to the Council and the Parliament ”. Transfer of air Passenger Name Record (PNR) data: A global EU approach, December 16 2003, COM(2003) 826 final
21. European Commission. 2005a. “ Commission decision amending its Rules of Procedure ”. 2005/960/EC, November 15
22. European Commission. 2005b. “ Communication from the Commission. A strategy on the external dimension of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ”. 12 October 2005, COM (2005) 491 final
23. European Commission. 2006. “ Scoreboard 2006 in Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Press release of speaking points for Franco Frattini ”.
24. European Commission. Helping EU citizens seize opportunities: EU’s policies and legislation in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Speech by Franco Frattini at the 4th European Jurists Forum. May32007, Vienna.
25. European Commission. The EU as an area of freedom, security and justice. EU policies in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: State of play and future perspectives. Speech by Franco Frattini at Vienna University. May32007, Vienna.
26. European Council. 1999a. “ Presidency conclusions. Helsinki European Council. Annex IV of the Presidency conclusions ”. In Bulletin of the European Union 12–1999.
27. European Council. 1999b. “ Presidency conclusions. Tampere European Council ”. In Bulletin of the European Union 10–1999
28. European Council. 2000. “ Presidency conclusions. Santa Maria Da Feira European Council ”. In Bulletin of the European Union 6-2000
29. European Court of Justice. 2001. “ Opinion 2/00 of the Court (regarding the Cartagena Protocol) ”. ECR I-9713, December 6 2001
30. European Court of Justice. 2006. Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04 European Parliament v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities. Official Journal of the EU, C178/02
31. Hall, P., and Taylor, R.C., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5): 936–57.
32. Holdgaard, R., 2008. External relations law of the European Community: Legal reasoning and legal discourses, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
33. Hooghe, L., and Marks, G., 1999. “ The birth of a polity: The struggle over European integration ”. In Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, Edited by: Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G., and Stephens, J., 70–101. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
34. Kerchove, G. de, and Weyembergh, A., eds. 2003. Sécurité et justice: Enjeu de la politique extérieure de l’Union européenne, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
35. Lavenex, S., 2004. EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4): 680–700.
36. Lavenex, S., 2006. Shifting up and out: The foreign policy of European immigration control. Western European Politics, 29 (2): 329–50.
37. Meyer, J.W., and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 340–63.
38. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Hungary. How the justice, freedom and security policies influence EU’s external action. Address by Franco Frattini at the Foreign Ministry Heads of Missions Conference. July302007, Budapest.
39. Ministry of Justice. 2006. National Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Fifth Progress Report on Counterterrorism, The Hague: Ministry of Justice.
40. Monar, J., 2004. The EU as an international actor in the domain of justice and home affairs. European Foreign Affairs Review, 9 (4): 395–415.
41. Moravcsik, A., 1993. Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4): 473–523.
42. Moravcsik, A., 1995. Liberal intergovernmentalism and integration: A rejoinder. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33 (4): 611–28.
43. Pastore, F., 2001. “ Reconciling the prince’s two ‘arms’: Internal–external security policy coordination in the European Union ”. In ISS-EU Occasional Paper 30
44. Pawlak, P., 2007. “ Transatlantic border and transport security cooperation: Can one swallow make a summer? ”. In Cooperating against terrorism. EU–US relations post September 11, Edited by: Hansen, D., and Ranstorp, M., 99–112. Stockholm: National Defence College.
45. Peterson, J., and Bomberg, E., 1999. Decision-making in the European Union, New York: Macmillan.
46. Philippart, E., Deconstruction and reconstruction of EU pillars: the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership and the Middle East Peace Process. Paper presented at the Third Pan-European International Relations Conference ECPR-ISA. September16–191998, Vienna. pp. 2–3.
47. Radaelli, C., 1999. Technocracy in the European Union, London: Longman.
48. Sandholtz, W., and Stone Sweet, A., 1998. European integration and supranational governance, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
49. Shepsle, K., and Weingast, B., 1987. The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review, 81 (1): 85–104.
50. Stetter, S., 2004. Cross-pillar politics: functional unity and institutional fragmentation of EU foreign policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4): 720–39.
51. Stevens, A., and Stevens, H., 2001. Brussels bureaucrats? The administration of the European Union, New York: Palgrave.
52. Trauner, F., 2005. External aspects of internal security: A research agenda, EU-Consent Project: Wider Europe-Deeper Integration? Constructing Europe Network, EU-Consent
53. Walker, N., ed. 2004. Europe’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
54. Weingast, B., 1996. “ Political institutions: Rational choice perspectives ”. In A new handbook of political science, Edited by: Goodin, R.E., and Klingemann, H.D., 167–90. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
55. Wessel, R., 2004. “ Fragmentation in the governance of EU external relations: Legal institutional dilemmas and the new constitution for Europe ”. In Centre for European Studies Working Paper, Univ. of Twente. No 3/04