Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Liang, Yeong Cherng ^a   Lim, Chu Wee ^b   Deng, Dong Ling ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DSO NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (Singapore)

^c NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELL INEQUALITIES; CLASSICAL CORRELATION; CLAUSER HORNE SHIMONY HOLTS; LOWER AND UPPER BOUNDS; POLYTOPES; POSITIVE INTEGER D; PROBABILITY INEQUALITIES; QUANTUM STATE; UPPER BOUND; WINNING PROBABILITY;

BELLS; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

PROBABILITY;

EID: 70849120201     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052116     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
2. R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1 (3), 1 (2001).
3. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Today 38 (4), 38 (1985). 10.1063/1.880968
4. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
5. V. Scarani and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 117901 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.117901
6. A. Acín, N. Gisin, and Ll. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405
7. Č. Brukner, M. Zukowski, J.-W. Pan, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127901 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127901
8. R. Cleve, P. Høyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity 2004, Amherst, MA (IEEE, New York, 2004), pp. 236-249.
9. A. C. Doherty, Y.-C. Liang, B. Toner, and S. Wehner, Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity 2008 (IEEE Computer Society, College Park, MD, 2008), pp. 199-210.
10. J. Silman, S. Machnes, and N. Aharon, Phys. Lett. A 372, 3796 (2008). 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.03.001
11. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
12. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
13. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974). 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526
14. Strictly, of course, a correlation inequality such as the Bell-CHSH inequality is also applicable to an experimental scenario involving an arbitrary number of measurement outcomes that are all bounded between -1 and 1 (see, for example, Ref.).
15. E. R. Loubenets, J. Phys. A 41, 445304 (2008).
16. D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 37, 1775 (2004). 10.1088/0305-4470/ 37/5/021
17. T. Ito, H. Imai, and D. Avis, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042109 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.042109
18. N. Brunner and N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 372, 3162 (2008). 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.01.052
19. Y.-C. Liang, Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, 2008
20. see also e-print arXiv:0810.5400.
21. K. F. Pál and T. Vértesi, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022120 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.022120
22. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
23. T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, and A. Gilchrist, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022313 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022313
24. B. P. Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P. Almeida, T. Jennewein, T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O'Brien, A. Gilchrist, and A. G. White, Nat. Phys. 5, 134 (2009). 10.1038/nphys1150
25. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404
26. D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, J.-L. Chen, M. Zukowski, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032118 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032118
27. S. Zohren and R. D. Gill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120406 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.120406
28. Ll. Masanes, Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 345 (2003).
29. I. Pitowsky, Quantum Probability-Quantum Logic (Springer, Berlin, 1989)
30. I. Pitowsky, Math. Program. 50, 395 (1991) 10.1007/BF01594946
31. A. Peres, Found. Phys. 29, 589 (1999). 10.1023/A:1018816310000
32. G. M. Zigler, Lectures on Polytopes (Springer, New York, 1995)
33. B. Grünbaum, Convex Polytopes (Springer, New York, 2003).
34. H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062310 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062310
35. A. Acín, J. L. Chen, N. Gisin, D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 250404 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 250404
36. H. Buhrman and S. Massar, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052103 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052103
37. J.-L. Chen, C. Wu, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032107 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032107
38. S.-W. Lee and D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. A 80, 010103 (R) (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.010103
39. D.-L. Deng, Z.-S. Zhou, and J.-L. Chen, Ann. Phys. 324, 1996 (2009). 10.1016/j.aop.2009.05.002
40. L.-B. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130404 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 130404
41. W. Son, J. Lee, and M. S. Kim, J. Phys. A 37, 11897 (2004) 10.1088/0305-4470/37/49/009
42. W. Son, J. Lee, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 060406 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.060406
43. J.-L. Chen, C. F. Wu, L. C. Kwek, D. Kaszlikowski, M. Zukowski, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032107 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032107
44. S.-W. Ji, J. Lee, J. Lim, K. Nagata, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052103 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052103
45. J.-L. Chen and D.-L. Deng, Phys. Rev. A 79, 012111 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.012111
46. S.-W. Lee, Y. W. Cheong, and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 76, 032108 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.032108
47. A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052325
48. J.-L. Chen, C. Wu, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh, and M.-L. Ge, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032106 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.032106
49. N. Gisin, in Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle: Essays in Honour of Abner Shimony, edited by, W. C. Myrvold, and, J. Christian, (Springer, The Netherlands, 2009), pp. 125-138
50. see also e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0702021.
51. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994). 10.1007/BF02058098
52. A. A. Méthot and V. Scarani, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 157 (2007).
53. N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and V. Scarani, New J. Phys. 7, 88 (2005). 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/088
54. Ll. Masanes, Y.-C. Liang, and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 090403 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.090403
55. To see this, note that there can be at most d2 nonzero entries (each upper bounded by 1) in the sum in Eq..
56. S. Khot, Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, New York, 2002), pp. 767-775.
57. After taking into account of the observations that we have made, an exhaustive search would still require us to consider 2 dd-2 distinct possibilities.
58. D. Avis, H. Imai, T. Ito, and Y. Sasaki, J. Phys. A 38, 10971 (2005). 10.1088/0305-4470/38/50/007
59. B. S. Cirel'son, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980). 10.1007/BF00417500
60. S. L. Braunstein, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3259
61. While the non-Hermiticy of the Bell operator can be remedied by explicitly including also the complex conjugate of the correlation Bell function, such as that done in Eq. (1) of Ref., the problem with measuring (A sa) n and (B sb) n in a way different from A sa and B sb remains, which makes it dubious in calling I c,d + a d setting, instead of a d (d-1) -setting Bell correlation inequalities.
62. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2564 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2564
63. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010401
64. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008) 10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013
65. S. Pironio, M. Navascués, and A. Acín, e-print arXiv:0903.4368.
66. Y.-C. Liang and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042103 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.042103
67. The eigenstate of B giving the largest eigenvalue is the quantum state that gives the highest violation of Id+ for the measurements defining B.
68. J. Håstad, J. ACM 48, 798 (2001). 10.1145/502090.502098