Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces

Nature Physics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 134-140

  Lanyon, Benjamin P ^a   Barbieri, Marco ^a   Almeida, Marcelo P ^a   Jennewein, Thomas ^a,b   Ralph, Timothy C ^a   Resch, Kevin J ^a,c   Pryde, Geoff J ^a,d   O'Brien, Jeremy L ^a,e   Gilchrist, Alexei ^a,f   White, Andrew G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^f MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; QUANTUM OPTICS; QUBITS;

BUILDING BLOCKES; FULL-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL; INFORMATION CARRIERS; OF QUANTUM-INFORMATION; PHYSICAL ARCHITECTURE; QUANTUM CIRCUIT; QUANTUM LOGIC GATE;

COMPUTER CIRCUITS;

EID: 59349099314     PISSN: 17452473     EISSN: 17452481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1150     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Schraidt-Kaler, F. et al. Realization of the Cirac-Zoller controlled-NOT quantum gate. Nature 422, 408-411 (2003).
2. Leibfried, D. et al. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate. Nature 422, 412-415 (2003).
3. O'Brien, J. L., Piyde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Branning, D. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426, 264-267 (2003).
4. Gasparoni, S., Pan, J.-W., Walther, P., Rudolph, T. & Zeilinger, A. Realization of a photonic controlled-NOT gate sufficient for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004).
5. Pittman, T. B., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C. & Franson, J. D. Experimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis. Phys. Rev. A 68, 032316 (2003).
6. Bao, X.-H. et al. Optical nondestructive controlled-NOT gate without using entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 170502 (2007).
7. Steffen, M. et al. Measurement of the entanglement of two superconducting qubits via state tomography. Science 313, 1423-1425 (2006).
8. Plantenberg, J. H., de Groot, P. C., Harmans, C. J. P. M. & Mooij, J. E. Demonstration of controlled-NOT quantum gates on a pair of superconducting quantum bits. Nature 447, 836-839 (2007).
9. Mandel, O. et al. Controlled collisions for multi-particle entanglement of optically trapped atoms. Nature 425, 937-940 (2003).
10. Anderlini, M. et al. Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448, 452-456 (2007).
11. Ralph, T. C., Resch, K. J. & Gilchrist, A. Efficient Toffoli gates using qudits. Phys. Rev. A 75, 022313 (2007).
12. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
13. Cory, D. G. et al. Experimental quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2152-2155 (1998).
14. Dennis, E. Toward fault-tolerant quantum computation without concatenation. Phys. Rev. A 63, 052314 (2001).
15. Shi, Y. Both Toffoli and controlled-NOT need little help to do universal quantum computation. Quantum Inform. Comput. 3, 84-92 (2003).
16. Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704-1707 (2005).
17. Shor, P. Proc 35th Ann. Symp. Found. Camp. Sci. 124-134 (IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, 1994).
18. Kwiat, P., Mitchell, J. R., Schwindt, P. & White, A. Graver's search algorithm: An optical approach.;. Mod. Opt. 47, 257-266 (2000).
19. Schuck, C., Huber, G., Kurtsiefer, C. & Weinfurter, H. Complete deterministic linear optics Bell state analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 190501 (2006).
20. Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46-52 (2001).
21. Roos, C. F. et al. Control and measurement of three-qubit entangled states. Science 304, 1478-1480 (2004).
22. Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091-1094 (1995).
23. Cory, D. G., Price, M. D. & Havel, T. F. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: An experimentally accessible paradigm for quantum computing. Physica D 120, 82-101 (1998).
24. Braunstein, S. L. et al. Separability of very noisy mixed states and implications for NMR quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1054-1057 (1999).
25. Menicucci, N. C. & Caves, C. M. Local realistic model for the dynamics of bulk-ensemble NMR information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 167901 (2002).
26. Jones, J. NMR quantum computation: A critical evaluation. Fortschritte der Physik 48, 909-924 (2000).
27. O'Brien, J. L. et al. Quantum process tomography of a controlled-NOT gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 080502 (2004).
28. Langford, N. K. et al. Demonstration of a simple entangling optical gate and its use in Bell-state analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210504 (2005).
29. Kiesel, N., Schmid, C., Weber, U., Ursin, R. & Weinfurter, H. Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210505 (2005).
30. Okamoto, R., Hofmann, H. F., Takeuchi, S. & Sasaki, K. Demonstration of an optical quantum controlled-NOT gate without path interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210506 (2005).
31. O'Brien, J. L. Optical quantum computing. Science 318, 1567-1570 (2007).
32. Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135-174 (2007).
33. Nielsen, M. A. Optical quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004).
34. Yoran, N. & Reznik, B. Deterministic linear optics quantum computation with single photon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 037903 (2003).
35. Ralph, T. C., Hayes, A. J. F. & Gilchrist, A. Loss-tolerant optical qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 100501 (2005).
36. Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501 (2005).
37. Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor's algorithm with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250505 (2007).
38. Ralph, T. C. Scaling of multiple postselected quantum gates in optics. Phys. Rev. A 70, 012312 (2004).
39. White, A. G. et al. Measuring two-qubit gates. J. Opt. Soc Am. B 24, 172-183 (2007).
40. Vidal, G. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
41. Rarity, J., Tapster, P. & Loudon, R. Quantum Interferometry (VCH, 1996).
42. Weinhold, T. J. et al. Understanding photonic quantum-logic gates: the road to fault tolerance. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/0808. 0794〉 (2008).
43. Monz, T. et al. Realization of the quantum Toffoli gate with trapped ions. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0082〉 (2008).
44. James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).