An anomaly of non-locality

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 7, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 157-170

  Méthot, André Allan ^a   Scarani, Valerio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Entanglement; Non locality; Simulation of entanglement

Indexed keywords

BELLS;

BELL INEQUALITIES; ENTANGLEMENT; KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISTANCE; MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATE; NON-MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATE; NONLOCALITIES; QUANTUM STATE; SIMULATION OF ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 33750458100     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen (1935), Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be complete?, Physical Review, Vol. 47, pp. 777-780.
2. J. S. Bell (1964), On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics, Vol. 1, pp. 195-200.
3. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard and G. Roger (1982), Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 49, pp. 1804-1807.
4. D.M. Greenberger, M. Home and A. Zeilinger (1989), Going beyond Bell's theorem, in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos (editor), Kluwer Academic, pp. 69-72.
5. N. Gisin (1991), Bell's inequality holds for all non-product states, Physics Letters A, Vol. 154, pp. 201-202.
6. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich (1992), Generic quantum nonlocality, Physics Letters A, Vol. 166, pp. 293-297.
7. R. F. Werner (1989), Quantum states with Einstein-Podolski-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Physical Review A, Vol. 40, pp. 4277-4281.
8. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and M. Horodecki (1995), Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2 states: necessary and sufficient condition, Physics Letters A, Vol. 200, pp. 340-344.
9. M. J. Donald, M. Horodecki and O. Rudolph (2002), The uniqueness theorem for entanglement measures, Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 43, pp. 4252-4272.
10. P. Eberhard (1993), Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment, Physical Review A, Vol. 47, pp. R747-R750.
11. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt (1969), Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 23, pp. 880-884.
12. A. Fine (1982), Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 48, pp. 291-294.
13. D. Collins and N. Gisin (2004), A relevant two qubit Bell inequality inequivalent to the CHSH inequality, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vo. 37, pp. 1775-1787.
14. B. S. Tsirelson (1987), Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains., Journal of Soviet Mathematics Vol. 35, pp. 557-570.
15. J. F. Clauser, and M. A. Home (1974), Experimental consequences of objective local theories Physical Review D, Vol. 10, pp. 526-535.
16. N. Gisin and B. Gisin (1999), A local hidden variable model of quantum correlation exploiting the detection loophole, Physics Letters A, Vol. 260, pp. 323-327.
17. L. Masanes (2003), Tight Bell inequality for d-outcome measurements correlations, Quantum Information and Computation, Vol. 3, pp. 345-358.
18. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar and S. Popescu (2002), Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88, p. 040404.
19. A. Acín, private communication.
20. N. Gisin, private communication.
21. A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin and J. I. Latorre (2002), Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems, Physical Review A, Vol. 65, p. 052325.
22. A. Acín, R. Gill and N. Gisin (2005), Optimal Bell tests do not require maximally entangled states, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 95, p. 210402.
23. J. Barrett, L. Hardy and A. Kent (2005), No signaling and quantum key distribution, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 95, p. 010503.
24. A. Acín, N. Gisin and L. Masanes, From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/ 0510094.
25. V. Scarani, N. Gisin, N. Brunner, L. Masanes, S. Pino and A. Acín, Secrecy extraction from non local correlations, to appear, preprint available at http://www.arxiv.org/quant-ph/0606197.
26. T. Maudlin (1992), Bell's inequality, information transmission, and prism models, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, pp. 404-417.
27. G. Brassard, R. Cleve, and A. Tapp (1999), Cost of exactly simulating quantum entanglement with classical communication, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 83, pp. 1874-1877.
28. B. F. Toner and D. Bacon (2003), The communication cost of simulating Bell correlations, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 91, p. 187904.
29. B. S. Tsirelson (1993), Some results and problems on quantum Bell-type inequalities, Hadronic ournal Supplement, Vol. 8, pp. 329-345.
30. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich (1994), Quantum nonlocality as an axiom, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 24, pp. 379-385.
31. N. Cerf, N. Gisin, S. Massar and S. Popescu (2005), Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 94, p. 220403.
32. J. Degorre, S. Laplante and J. Roland, Simulating quantum correlations as a distributed sampling problem, Physical Review A, 72, pp. 062314.
33. N. Gisin, S. Popescu, V. Scarani, S. Wolf and J. Wullschleger, Oblivious transfer and quantum channels, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0601157.
34. N. Brunner, N. Gisin and V. Scarani (2005), Entanglement and non-locality are different resources, New Journal of Physics, Vol. 7, p. 88.
35. L. Hardy (1992), Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 68, pp. 2981-2984.
36. G. Brassard, Quantum Information Processing for Computer Scientist, MIT Press, Cambridge, to appear.
37. A. A. Méthot, On local-hidden-variable no-go theorems, Canadian Journal of Physics, to appear, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0507149.
38. G. Brassard and A. A. Méthot, Clear separations in Bell-theorem complexity classes, in preparation.
39. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin and W. K. Wooters (1996), Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 76, pp. 722-725.
40. B. S. Cirel'son (1980), Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality, Letters in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 4, pp. 93-100.
41. A. Broadbent and A. A. Méthot, On the power of non-local boxes, Theoretical Computer Science C, 358, pp. 3-14.
42. P. Hayden and A. Winter (2003), Communication cost of entanglement transformations. Physical Review A Vol. 67, pp. 012326.
43. W. van Dam and P. Hayden (2003), Universal entanglement transformations without communication, Physical Review A Vol. 67, pp. 060302R.
44. Č. Brukner, M. Zukowski and A. Zeilinger (2002), Quantum Communication Complexity Protocol with Two Entangled Qutrits, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, pp. 197901.
45. Č. Brukner, M. Zukowski, J.-W. Pan and A. Zeilinger (2004), Bell's Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 92, pp. 127901.