Coincidence Bell inequality for three three-dimensional systems

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 25 I, 2004, Pages

  Acin A ^a,b   Chen, J L ^c,d   Gisin, N ^b   Kaszlikowski, D ^d,e   Kwek, L C ^d,f   Oh, C H ^d   Zukowski, M ^e  

^a ICFO INSTITUT DE CIENCIES FOTONIQUES   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTE OF APPLIED PHYSICS AND COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS   (China)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^f NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELL INEQUALITY; COINCIDENCE PROBABILITY; POLYTOPES; QUTRIT;

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; CORRELATION METHODS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM THEORY; RELATIVITY; VECTORS;

OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS;

EID: 84862398526     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.250404     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
2. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
3. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Home, and A. Zeilinger, in Bell's Theorem and the Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989).
4. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990).
5. A. V. Belinskii and D. N. Klyshko, Phys. Usp. 36, 653 (1993).
6. N. Gisin and A. Peres, Phys. Lett. A 162, 15 (1992).
7. D. Kaszlikowski, P. Ganciński, M. Zukowski, W. Mislaszewski, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (2000).
8. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
9. D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, J. L. Chen, M. Zukowski, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032118 (2002).
10. Ll. Masanes, Quant Inf. Comp. 3, 345 (2003); quant-ph/0210073.
11. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, and M. A. Home, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2564 (1997).
12. R. T. Thew, A. Acin, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, quant-ph/ 0307122.
13. A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2002).
14. M. Zukowski and D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3200 (1999); Vienna Circle Yearbook, edited by D. Greenberger, W. L. Reiter, and A. Zeilinger (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999), Vol. 7; D. Kaszlikowski and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042107 (2002).
15. M. Zukowski and D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3200 (1999); Vienna Circle Yearbook, edited by D. Greenberger, W. L. Reiter, and A. Zeilinger (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999), Vol. 7; D. Kaszlikowski and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042107 (2002).
16. M. Zukowski and D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3200 (1999); Vienna Circle Yearbook, edited by D. Greenberger, W. L. Reiter, and A. Zeilinger (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999), Vol. 7; D. Kaszlikowski and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042107 (2002).
17. N. J. Cerf, S. Massar, and S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 080402 (2002).
18. D. Kaszlikowski, D. Gosal, E. J. Ling, L. C. Kwek, M. Zukowski, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032103 (2002).
19. I. Percival, Phys. Lett. A 244, 495 (1998).
20. D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 37, 1775 (2004); C. Sliwa, Phys. Lett. A 317, 165 (2003).
21. D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 37, 1775 (2004); C. Sliwa, Phys. Lett. A 317, 165 (2003).
22. Very little is known about the classification of three-party entangled states. Indeed, even the existence of a maximally entangled state of three qudits, as in the bipartite case, may not be a well-defined problem.
23. S. L. Braunstein, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259 (1992).
24. N. Gisin and H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Phys. Lett. A 246, 1 (1998).
25. J.-L. Chen et al., quant-ph/0311180.