Large group high-fidelity simulation enhances medical student learning

Medical Teacher

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Heitz, Corey ^a   Brown, Ashley ^b   Johnson, James E ^b   Fitch, Michael T ^b  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURSE CONTENT; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GROUP PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING STYLE; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; MEDICAL STUDENT; NEUROSCIENCE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; RECALL; REINFORCEMENT; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEARNING; NORTH CAROLINA; PATIENT SIMULATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 70849114953     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01421590802637990     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bond WF, Spillane L. 2002. The use of simulation for emergency medicine resident assessment. Acad Emerg Med 9:1295-1299.
2. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. 2000. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 75:182-190.
3. Euliano TY. 2001. Small group teaching: Clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol Educ 25:36-43.
4. Fitch MT. 2007. Using high-fidelity emergency simulation with large groups of preclinical medical students in a basic science course. Med Teach 29:261-263.
5. Gordon JA. 2000. The human patient simulator: Acceptance and efficacy as a teaching tool for students. The Medical Readiness Trainer Team. Acad Med 75:522.
6. Gordon JA, Brown DM, Armstrong EG. 2006. Can a simulated critical care encounter accelerate basic science learning among preclinical medical students? Simulation Healthcare 1:13-17.
7. Gordon JA, Oriol NE, Cooper JB. 2004. Bringing good teaching cases ''to life'': A simulator-based medical education service. Acad Med 79:23-27.
8. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE. 2003. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. Am J Epidemiol 157:364-375.
9. Harden RM. 2000. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 34:551-557.
10. Koniaris LG, Kaufman D, Zimmers TA, Wang N, Spitalnik PF, Henson L, Miller-Graziano C, Sitzmann JV. 2004. Two third-year medical studentlevel laboratory shock exercises without large animals. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 5:343-348.
11. MacDowall J. 2006. The assessment and treatment of the acutely ill patient - The role of the patient simulator as a teaching tool in the undergraduate programme. Med Teach 28:326-329.
12. McMahon GT, Monaghan C, Falchuk K, Gordon JA, Alexander EK. 2005. A simulator-based curriculum to promote comparative and reflective analysis in an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 80:84-89.
13. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. 2002. A worldwide survey of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 49:659-662.
14. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, DeSousa S, Lam-McCulloch J. 2006. Applying theory to practice in undergraduate education using high fidelity simulation. Med Teach 28:e10-e15.
15. Pring R. 1970. Curriculum integration. In: Hooper R, editor. The curriculum: Context design and development education. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. pp 265-272.
16. Tan GM, Ti LK, Suresh S, Ho BS, Lee TL. 2002. Teaching first-year medical students physiology: Does the human patient simulator allow for more effective teaching? Singapore Med J 43:238-242.
17. Vozenilek J, Wang E, Kharasch M, Anderson B, Kalaria A. 2006. Simulationbased morbidity and mortality conference: New technologies augmenting traditional case-based presentations. Acad Emerg Med 13:48-53.
18. Weller JM. 2004. Simulation in undergraduate medical education: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Educ 38:32-38.
19. Whitehead AN. 1929. The aims of education. New York: The Free Press.