Single echo acquisition MRI using RF encoding

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 982-993

  Wright, Steven M ^a,b,c   McDougall, Mary Preston ^a,b  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b Texas A M University   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic imaging; MRI; Parallel imaging; Radiofrequency coils

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC IMAGING; FRAME RATE; FRAMES PER SECONDS; GRADIENT FIELDS; IMAGE INFORMATION; IMAGING SPEED; K-SPACE; LIMITS OF DETECTION; MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT; MR IMAGING; NEW APPLICATIONS; ONE DIMENSION; ONE-DIMENSIONAL ARRAYS; PARALLEL IMAGING; PARTIAL ENCODING; PERIPHERAL NERVES; PHASE COMPENSATION; PHASE VARIATION; RADIO FREQUENCY COILS; RADIO-FREQUENCY COIL; RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT; RF COIL; SIGNAL CANCELLATION; SINGLE ECHO ACQUISITIONS; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; SPATIAL LOCALIZATION; SPEED CONSTRAINTS; STEADY STATE; TRANSVERSE MAGNETIZATION;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTIC EFFECT; RESONANCE;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NERVE STIMULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SINGLE ECHO ACQUISITION IMAGING; STEADY STATE; VELOCITY;

ARTIFACTS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIO WAVES; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70849107867     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1399     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Nitz WR. Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur. Radiol. 2002; 12: 2866-2882.
2. Cohen MS. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging. Methods 2001; 25: 201-220. (Pubitemid 34135429)
3. Moser KW, Raguin GL, Harris A, Morris HD, Georgiadis J, Shannon M, Philpott M. Visualization of Taylor-Couette and spiral Poiseuille flows using a snapshot FLASH spatial tagging sequence. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000; 18: 199-207.
4. Derakhshan JJ, Duerk JL. Update to pulse sequences for interventional MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2005; 13: 415-429.
5. Glover GH, Lai S. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 361-368.
6. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 42: 952-962.
7. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 38: 591-603.
8. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions( GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 47: 1202-1210.
9. Kyriakos WE, Panych LP, Kacher DF, Westin CF, Bao SM, Mulkern RV, Jolesz FA. Sensitivity profiles from an array of coils for encoding and reconstruction in parallel (SPACE RIP). Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 301-308.
10. Kwiat D, Einav S, Navon G. A decoupled coil detector array for fast image acquisition in magnetic resonance imaging. Med. Phys. 1991; 18: 251-265.
11. Hutchinson M, Raff U. Fast MRI data acquisition using multiple detectors. Magn. Reson. Med. 1988; 6: 87-91.
12. Carlson JW, Minemura T. Imaging time reduction through multiple receiver coil data acquisition and image reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993; 29: 681-687.
13. Carlson JW. An algotihm for NMR imaging reconstruction based on multiple RF receiver coils. J. Magn. Reson. 1987; 74: 376-380.
14. Kelton JR, Magin RL, Wright SM. An algorithm for rapid image acquisition using multiple receiver coils. Proceedings of the SMRM 8th Annual Meeting, (Works in Progress), 1989; 1172.
15. Sodickson DK, Hardy CJ, Zhu Y, Giaquinto RO, Gross P, Kenwood G, Niendorf T, Lejay H, McKenzie CA, Ohliger MA, Grant AK, Rofsky NM. Rapid volumetric MRI using parallel imaging with order-of-magnitude accelerations and a 32-element RF coil array: feasibility and implications. 2005; 12: 626-635.
16. Hardy CJ, Darrow RD, Saranathan M, Giaquinto RO, Zhu Y, Dumoulin CL, Bottomley PA. Large field-of-view real-time MRI with a 32-channel system. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 878-884.
17. Wiggins G, Potthast A, Trianafyllou C, Lin F, Benner T, Wiggins C, Wald LL. A 96-channel MRI system with 23- and 90-channel phased array head coils at 1.5 tesla. Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2005; 13: 671.
18. Lin FH, Wald LL, Ahlfors SP, Hamalainen MS, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW. Dynamic magnetic resonance inverse imaging of human brain function. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006; 56: 787-802.
19. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, Yoshitome E. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography. Magn. Reson. Med. 1988; 6: 275-286.
20. Knopp MV, Giesel FL, Marcos H, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Choyke P. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Top Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001; 12: 301-308.
21. Jolesz FA. Future perspectives for intraoperative MRI. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2005; 16: 201-213.
22. Tuncbilek N, Karakas HM, Okten OO. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Eur. J. Radiol. 2005; 53: 500-505.
23. Gach HM, Lowe IJ. Measuring flow reattachment lengths downstream of a stenosis using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000; 12: 939-948.
24. Siegel JMJ, Bergman HL, Ku DN. A comparison of laser, ultrasound, MRI, and computational fluid dynamics velocity determination in stenotic flow. ASME Adv. Bioeng. 1995; 29: 369-370.
25. Gach HM, Lowe IJ. Characterization of flow emerging from a stenosis using MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 40: 559-570.
26. Moser KW, Kutter EC, Georgiadis JG, Buckius RO, Morris HD, Torczynski JR. Velocity measurements of flow through a step stenosis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Exp. Fluids 2000; 29: 438-447.
27. Lardo AC. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging: diagnostic and interventional applications. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2000; 21: 80-98.
28. Sato Y, Irisawa G, Ishizuka M, Hishida K, Maeda M. Visualization of convective mixing in microchannel by fluorescence imaging. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2003; 14: 114-121.
29. Moser KW, Raguin LG, Georgiadis JG. Synchronized EPI phase contrast velocimetry in a mixing reactor. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003; 21: 127-133.
30. Fernandez J, Krechetnikov JF, Homsy GM. Experimental study of a surfactant-driven fingering phenomenon in a Hele-Shaw cell. J. Fluid Mech. 2005; 527: 197-216.
31. Hu Y-H, Chang M. Study in the design of micromixer and inspection of mixing efficiency. Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol.5261, 2004; 28-35.
32. Kang TG, Kwon TH. Colored particle tracking method for mixing analysis of chaotic micromixers. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2004; 14: 891-899.
33. Weigl BH, Bardell RL, Cabrera CR. Lab-on-a-chip for drug development. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2003; 55: 349-377.
34. Mautner T. Optimization of microfluidic mixing using multiobjective strategies. Proc. SPIE, vol.5763, p. 345, 2005.
35. Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A. Engineering flows in small devices: Microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2004; 36: 381-411.
36. Liu RH, Yang J, Pindera MZ, Athavale M, Grodzinski P. Bubble-induced acoustic micromixing. Lab Chip 2002; 2: 151-157.
37. Song H, Ismagilov RF. Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 14613-14619.
38. Desai A, Bokenkamp D, Yang X, Tai Y-C, Marzluff E, Mayo S.Microfluidic sub-millisecond mixers for the study of chemical reaction kinetics. Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators. Part 1 (of 2), Chicago, IL, USA, 16-19 June 1997.
39. Wolters AM, Jayawickrama DA,Webb AG, Sweedler JV. NMR detection with multiple solenoidal microcoils for continuous-flow capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 2002; 74: 5550-5555.
40. Song HK,Wehrli FW. Variable TE gradient and spin echo sequences for in vivo MR microscopy of short T2 species. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 251-258.
41. Yoshioka H, Haishi T, Uematsu T, Matsuda Y, Anno I, Echigo J, Lang P, Itai Y, Kose K. MR microscopy of articular cartilage at 1.5 T: orientation and site dependence of laminar structures. Skeletal Radiol. 2002; 31: 505-510. (Pubitemid 36067554)
42. Eckstein F, Glaser C. Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2004; 8: 329-353.
43. Eckstein F, Lemberger B, Gratzke C, Hudelmaier M, Glaser C, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005; 64: 291-295.
44. Herberhold C, Faber S, Stammberger T, Steinlechner M, Putz R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. In situ measurement of articular cartilage deformation in intact femoropatellar joints under static loading. J. Biomech. 1999; 32: 1287-1295.
45. Eckstein F, Tieschky M, Faber S, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Functional analysis of articular cartilage deformation, recovery, and fluid flow following dynamic exercise in vivo. Anat. Embryol. (Berl) 1999; 200: 419-424.
46. Papazoglou S, Braun J, Hamhaber U, Sack I. Two-dimensional wave-form analysis in MR elastography of skeletal muscles. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005; 50: 1313-1325.
47. Manduca A, Lake DS, Kruse SA, Ehman RL. Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images. Med. Image Anal. 2003; 7: 465-473.
48. Sack I, McGowan CK, Samani A, Luginbuhl C, Oakden W, Plewes DB. Observation of nonlinear shear wave propagation using magnetic resonance elastography. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 842-850.
49. Wu T, Felmlee JP, Greenleaf JF, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL. MR imaging of shear waves generated by focused ultrasound. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 43: 111-115.
50. Othman SF, Xu H, Royston TJ, Magin RL. Microscopic magnetic resonance elastography (microMRE). Magn. Reson. Med. 2005; 54: 605-615.
51. Golman K, Olsson LE, Axelsson O, Mansson S, Karlsson M, Petersson JS. Molecular imaging using hyperpolarized 13C. Br. J. Radiol. 2003; 76(2): S118-S127.
52. Golman K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Petersson JS, Mansson S, Leunbach I. Molecular imaging with endogenous substances. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003; 100: 10435-10439.
53. Salerno M, Altes TA, Brookeman JR, de Lange EE, Mugler JP 3rd. Dynamic spiral MRI of pulmonary gas flow using hyperpolarized (3)He: preliminary studies in healthy and diseased lungs. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001; 46: 667-677.
54. Wright SM, McDougall MP, Brown DG. Single echo acquisition of MR images using RF coil arrays. Proc. 2nd Joint IEEE EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002, vol.2, 1181-1182.
55. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Nittka M, Goldfarb JW, Haase A. Partially parallel imaging with localized sensitivities (PILS). Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 602-609.
56. Brown DG, McDougall MP, Wright SM. Receiver design for parallel imaging with large arrays. Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), vol.12: 2002; 863.
57. Wright SM, McDougall MP, Kurpad K, Brown DG. Parallel Imaging: System Design and Limitations. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Vol.2, 2004; 1200-1203.
58. Yallapragada N, Wright SM, McDougall M. A compact 64 channel real-time MRI reconstruction system. Proc. 13th Annl. Meeting Int. Soc. Magn. Res. Med. 2005; 13: 862.
59. Hyde JS, Froncisz W, Jesmanowicz A, Kneeland JB. Planar-pair local coils for high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, particularly of the temporomandibular joint. Med. Phys. 1986; 13: 1-7.
60. McDougall MP, Wright SM. 64-channel array coil for single echo acquisition magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005; 54: 386-392.
61. McDougall MP, Wright SM. Investigation of coil phase compensation in 3D imaging at very high acceleration factors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007; 25: 1305-1311.
62. Wright SM, McDougall MP. Coil effect on k-space line selection in highly accelerated parallel imaging. Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. 4th IEEE International Symposium, 2007; pp. 1016-1019.
63. McDougall MP, Wright SM. Phase compensation in single echo acquisition imaging. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2005; 24: 17-22.
64. Jesmanowicz A, Froncisz W, Hyde JS. A complication in prescan strategy when using surface coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 1987; 5: 318-322.
65. Sharp JC, King SB, Yin D, Volotovskyy V, Tomanek B. , High resolution 2D imaging without gradients with accelerated TRASE. Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2008; 16: 829.
66. McDougall MP, Wright SM. Coil phase compensation for single echo acquisition (SEA) imaging. Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), 12th Annual Meeting, 2004; p. 330.
67. McGibney G, Smith MR, Nichols ST, Crawley A. Quantitative evaluation of several partial Fourier reconstruction algorithms used in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993; 30: 51-519.
68. Wright S, McDougall M, Yallapragada N. Ultra-fast MR velocity measurement using spin-tagging and single-echo acquisition (SEA) imaging. Proceedings of the13th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006; 203 pp.
69. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn. Reson. Med. 1988; 8: 1-15.
70. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, DixonWT, Tuithof HH, Engels H, Nelson RC, Gerety BM, Chezmar JL, den Boer JA. Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993; 3: 671-675.
71. Famili N, Wright SM, Porter JR. MR flow measurement using RF phase gradients in receiver coil arrays. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1993; 40: 1243-1249.
72. Blaimer M, Ji J, McDougall MP, Griswold M, Wright SM. Improving image quality for single echo acquisitions (SEA): introducing two novel approaches. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 15: 3342.
73. Ji J, Son JB, McDougall MP, Wright SM. Regularized channeldependent kernel deconvolution for resolution enhancement in SEA imaging. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006; 14: 288.
74. Azhari H, Sodickson DK, Edelman RR. Rapid MR imaging by sensitivity profile indexing and deconvolution reconstruction (SPID). Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003; 21: 575-5784. (Pubitemid 37046556)
75. Sederman AJ, Mantle MD, Buckley C, Gladden LF. MRI technique for measurement of velocity vectors, acceleration, and autocorrelation functions in turbulent flow. J. Magn. Reson. 2004; 166: 182-189.
76. McDougall MP, Wright SM. Phase compensation in single echo acquisition imaging: phase effects of voxel-sized coils in planar and cylindrical arrays. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2005; 24: 17-22.
77. Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1974; 242: 190-191.