Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 674-680

  Perez, C R ^a   Hirata Jr , R ^a   Silva, A H M F T ^b   Sampaio, E M ^a   Miranda, M S ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b IPRJ/UERJ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BISCOVER; FILTEK SUPREME; FISSURE SEALANT; GLASS IONOMER; GRANDIO; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; IN VITRO STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACRYLATES; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 70849093858     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/08-014-L     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Yap AU, Sau CW & Lye KW (1998) Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 25 (6) 456-461.
2. Özgünaltay G, Yazici AR & Görücü J (2003) Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30 (2) 218-224.
3. Jones CS, Billington RW & Pearson GJ (2004) The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations British Dental Journal 196 (1) 42-45, discussion 31.
4. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV & Nelson IK (1996) The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: A profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 76 (1) 34-38.
5. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P & Quirynen M (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature Dental Materials 13 (4) 258-269.
6. Heintze SD, Forjanic M & Rousson V (2005) Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro Dental Materials 22 (2) 146-165.
7. Jones CS, Billington RW & Pearson GJ (2005) Laboratory study of the loads, speeds and times to finish and polish direct restorative materials Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32 (9) 686-692.
8. Ferreira RS, Lopes GC & Baratieri LN (2004) Direct posterior resin composite restorations: Considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures Quintessence International 35 (5) 359-366.
9. Türkün LS & Türkün M (2004) The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials Operative Dentistry 29 (2) 203-211.
10. Chung K (1994) Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites Dental Materials 10 (9) 325-330.
11. Barghi N & Alexander C (2003) A new surface sealant for polishing composite resin restorations Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 24 (8) 30-33.
12. Geiger S, Ravchanukayev M & Leberman R (1999) Surface roughness evaluation of resin modified glass-ionomer polished utilizing poly (acrylic acid) gel Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 26 (9) 704-709.
13. Pedrini D, Candido M S M & Rodrigues AL (2003) Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30 (7) 714-719.
14. Bagheri R, Burrow MF & Tyas MJ (2007) Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials-a SEM study Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 34 (1) 68-76.
15. Baseren M (2004) Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures Journal of Biomaterials Applications 19 (2) 121-134.
16. Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G & Rumi G (2001) 3-D surface profile analysis: Different finishing methods for resin composites Operative Dentistry 26 (6) 562-568.
17. Lu H, Roeder LB & Powers JM (2003) Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites Journal of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry 15 (5) 297-304.
18. Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ & Coury TL (1996) Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials Quintessence International 27 (4) 279-285.
19. Bouvier D, Duprez JP & Lissac M (1997) Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 24 (12) 888-894.
20. Borges AB, Marsilio AL, Pagani C & Rodrigues JR (2004) Surface roughness of packable resins polished with various systems Journal of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry 16 (1) 42-48.
21. Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro M F L & Nunes OB (2005) Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins Brazilian Dental Journal 16 (1) 39-44.
22. Suh BI (2003) A new resin technology: A glaze/composite sealant Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 24 (Supplement 8) 27-29.
23. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL & Serra MC (2005) Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures Dental Materials 21 (7) 641-648.