Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials

Quintessence International

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 279-285

  Fruits, Terry J ^a   Miranda, Frank J ^a   Coury, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DIAMOND; PRISMA APH; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; VALIANT PHD;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL POLISHING; DIAMOND; PARTICLE SIZE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0030115441     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. O'Brian WJ, Johnston WM, Fanion F, Lambert S. The surface roughness and gloss of composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:685-688.
2. Hachiya Y, Masaaki I, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:811-814.
3. Stanford WB, Fan PL, Wozniak WT, Stanford JW. Effect of finishing on color and gloss of composites with different fillers. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:211-213.
4. Chan KC, Fuller FL, Hormat AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:542-545.
5. Cunningham J. Finishing amalgam restorations. A comparison of techniques. Br Dent J 1977;142:9.
6. Chan KC, Edie JW, Boyer DB. Microstructure of amalgam surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:644-648.
7. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. Surface roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 1976;94:131-137.
8. Bryant RW, Collins CJ. Finishing techniques for amalgam restorations: Clinical assessment at three years. Aust Dent J 1992;37:333-339.
9. Waerhaug J. Effect of rough surfaces upon gingival tissue. J Dent Res 1956;35:323-325.
10. Gilmore N, Sheiham A. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1971;42:8-12.
11. Brunsvold M, Lane T. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:67-72.
12. Pack ARC, Coxhead LJ, Mcdonald BW. The prevalence of overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations and periodontal consequences. J Clin Periodont 1990;17:145-152.
13. Eide R, Tveit AB. A comparison of different techniques for finishing and polishing amalgam. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45:147-151.
14. Powers JM, Tate WH. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers [abstract 735]. J Dent Res 1995;74:492.
15. Williams G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 1993;24:641-658.
16. Liberman R, Geiger S. Surface texture evaluation of glass ionomer restorative materials polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:87-94.
17. McCabe JF, Caddick RJ. The finishing of composite restorations. Br Dent J 1978;145:101-104.