Effect of grass-clover forage and whole-wheat feeding on the sensory quality of eggs

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 343-348

  Horsted, Klaus ^a   Hammershøj, Marianne ^a   Allesen Holm, Bodil H ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Albumen; Free range; Grass clover; Sensory profile; Wheat; Yolk

Indexed keywords

ALBUMINOID; SULFUR;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CLOVER; COLOR; EGG; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; HEALTH FOOD; MEDICAGO; ODOR; OYSTER; POACEAE; STANDARD; TASTE; WHEAT; STANDARDS;

ALBUMINS; ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COLOR; EGGS; FEMALE; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH FOOD; MEDICAGO; ODORS; OSTREIDAE; POACEAE; SULFUR; TASTE; TRIFOLIUM; TRITICUM;

ANIMALIA; OSTREIDAE; TRIFOLIUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 70849084648     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3825     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Yiridoe EK, Bonti-Ankomah S and Martin RC, Comparisonof consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventional produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agric Food Syst 20:193-205 (2005).
2. The Danish Plant Directorate, Vejledning om økologisk jordbrugsproduktion. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, p. 101 (2008).
3. Council of the European Union, Council Regulation (EC) No.1804/1999 of 19 July 1999, supplementing Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production. Off J Eur Commun L 222:1-28 (1999).
4. Bubier NE and Bradshaw RH, Movement of flocks of laying hens in and out of the hen house in four free range systems. Br Poult Sci 39:S5-S6 (1998).
5. Hegelund L, Sørensen JT, Kjær JB and Kristensen IS, Use of range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover. Br Poult Sci 46:1-8 (2005).
6. Horsted K and Hermansen JE, Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops. Animal 1:575-585 (2007).
7. Horsted K, Hermansen JE and Ranvig H, Crop content in nutrient-restricted versus non-restricted organic laying hens with access to different forage vegetations. Br Poult Sci 48:177-184 (2007).
8. IFOAM, The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing, version 2005. IFOAM, Bonn, Germany (2005).
9. Lopez-Bote CJ, Sans Arias R, Rey AI, Castaño A, Isabel B and Thos J, Effect of free-range feeding on n-3 fatty acid and α-tocopherol content and oxidative stability of eggs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 72:33-40 (1998).
10. Hammershøj M and Steenfeldt S, Effects of blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) in organic layer diets and supplementation with foraging material on egg production and some egg quality parameters. Poult Sci 84:723-733 (2005).
11. Heuser GF, Feeding Poultry, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1955).
12. Woese K, Lange D, Boess C and Bögl KW, A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods - Results of are view of the relevant literature. J Sci Food Agric 74:281-293 (1997).
13. ISO 3972: 1991, Sensory Analysis - Methodology - Method of Investigating Sensitivity of Taste. Ref. no. ISO 3972:1991 (E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, p. 7 (1991).
14. ISO 8589: 1988, Sensory analysis - General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms. Ref. no. ISO 8589: 1988 (E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, p. 9 (1988).
15. American Society for Testing and Materials, Physical Requirements. Guidelines for Sensory Evaluation Laboratories, STP 913. ASTM, Pennsylvania (1986).
16. ISO 13299: 2003, Sensory Analysis - General Guidance for Establishing a Sensory Profile. Ref. No. ISO 13299: 2003 (E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, p. 24 (2003).
17. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Guide for Serving Protocol for Sensory Evaluation of Foods and Beverages, E1871-06. ASTM, Pennsylvania (2006).
18. ISO 8586-1: 1993, SensoryAnalysis - GeneralGuidancefortheSelection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors. Ref. no. ISO 8586-1: 1993 (E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, p. 15 (1993).
19. th edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 43-57 (2007).
20. Biosystèmes. FIZZ Software Solution for sensory Analysis and Consumer Tests, [Online]. Available: http://www.biosystemes.com/data-collection,fizz-network.php [12 June 2009].
21. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW and Wolfinger RD, SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (1996).
22. Matforsk AS, The PanelCheck Project. [Online]. Available: http://www.panelcheck.com/ [24 June 2009].
23. Hoo KA, Tvarlapati KJ, Piovoso MJ and Hajare R, A method of robust multivariate outlier replacement. Comput Chem Eng 26:17-39 (2002).
24. Horsted K, Hammershøj M and Hermansen JE, Short-term effects on productivity and egg quality in nutrient-restricted versus non-restricted organic layers with access to different forage crops. Acta Agric Scand Sect A 56:42-54 (2006).
25. Prache S, Priolo A and Grolier P, Persistence of carotenoid pigments in the blood of concentrate-finished grazing sheep: Its significance for the traceability of grass-feeding. J Anim Sci 81:360-367 (2003).
26. Cardinault N, Doreau M, Poncet C and Noziére P, Digestion and absorption of carotenoids in sheep given fresh red clover. Anim Sci 82:49-55 (2006).
27. Belyavin CC and Marangos AG, Natural products for egg yolk pigmentation, in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, ed. By Haresign W and Cole DJA. Butterworths, London, pp. 47-68 (1987).
28. Nys Y, Dietary carotenoids and egg yolk coloration - a review. Arch Geflügelkd 64:45-54 (2000).
29. Beardsworth PM and Hernandez J-M, Yolk colour - an important egg quality attribute. Int Poult Prod 12:17-18 (2004).
30. Christensen CM, Effects of color on aroma, flavour and texture judgments of foods. J Food Sci 48:787-790 (1983).
31. McCammon RB, Pittman MS and Wilhelm LA, The odor and flavor of eggs. Poult Sci 13:95-101 (1934).
32. Ribaya-Mercado JD and Blumberg JB, Lutein and zeaxanthinand their potential roles in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr 23:567S-587S (2004).
33. Surai AP, Surai PF, Steinberg W, Wakeman WG, Speake BK and Sparks NHC, Effect of canthaxanthin content of the maternal diet on the antioxidant system of the developing chick. Br Poult Sci 44:612-619 (2003).
34. Rose SP and Kyriazakis I, Diet selection of pigs and poultry. Proc Nutr Soc 50:87-98 (1991).
35. Henuk YL and Dingle JG, Practical and economic advantages of choice feeding systems for laying poultry. World Poult Sci J 58:199-208 (2002).
36. Larbier M and Leclercq B, NutritionandFeedingofPoultry. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, p. 305 (1994).
37. Chavez C, Coufal CD, Niemeyer PL, Carey JB, Lacey RE, Miller RK, et al, Impact of dietary supplemental methionine sources on sensory measurement of odor-related compounds in broiler excreta. Poult Sci 83:1655-1662 (2004).
38. Chavez C, Coufal CD, Carey JB, Lacey RE, Beier RC and Zahn JA, The impact of supplemental dietary methionine sources on volatile compound concentrations in broiler excreta. Poult Sci 83:901-910 (2004).
39. Wood GM, Smith RT and Henderson DC, A crop analysis technique for studying the food habits and preferences of chickens on range. Poult Sci 42:304-309 (1963).
40. Horsted K, Hermansen JE and Hansen H, Botanical composition of herbage intake of free-range laying hens determined by microhistological analysis of faeces. Arch Geflügelkd 71:145-151(2007).
41. Lee MRF, Evans PR, Nute GR, Richardson RI and Scollan ND, A comparison between red clover silage and grass silage feeding on fatty acid composition, meat stability and sensory quality of the M. Longissimus muscle of dairy cull cows. Meat Sci 81:738-744 (2009).