Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Gruber, S ^a   Colbach, N ^b   Barbottin, A ^c   Pekrun, C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^d Hochschule fur Wirtschaft und Umwelt Nurtingen Geislingen   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beta vulgaris; Brassica napus; Seed bank; Seed impurities; Tillage; Transgenes; Transportation; Triticum aestivum; Unwanted admixture; Volunteers; Zea mays

Indexed keywords

EID: 70749150116     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20083015     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. James C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006. ISAAA Briefs No. 35. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY; 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/35/executivesummary/default. html (verified 11 December 2007).
2. Brookes G, Barfoot P. GM Crops: The First Ten Years - Global Social-economic and Environmental Impacts. ISAAA Briefs No. 36. ISAAA Ithaca, NY; 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/ briefs/36/download/isaaa-brief-36-2006.pdf (verified 11 December 2007).
3. Orson J. Gene stacking in herbicide tolerant oilseed rape: lessons from the North America experience. Northminister House, Peterborough: English Nature Reports 2002;443.
4. Richard-Molard M, Muchembled C, Gestat de Garambé T. Expérimentations aux champs de betteraves tolérantes à un herbicide non sélectif: premiers résultats et perspectives. In: Proceedings of the Xème Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes; September 1996; Dijon, France; 1996. p. 231-8.
5. Chèvre AM, Eber H, Darmency H, Fleury A, Picault H, Letanneur JC, et al. Assessment of interspecific hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild radish under normal agronomic conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2000;100:1233-9.
6. Desplanque B, Hautekeete N, Van Dijk H. Transgenic weed beets: possible, probable, avoidable? Journal of Applied Ecology 2002;39:561-71.
7. Darmency H, Vigouroux Y, Gestat de Garambé T, Richard-Molard M, Muchembled C. Transgene escape in sugar beet production fields: data from six years farm scale monitoring. Environmental Biosafety Research 2007;6:197-206.
8. Matus-Cadiz MA, Hucl P, Horak MJ, Blomquist LK. Gene flow in wheat at the field scale. Crop Science 2004;44:718-27.
9. Guéritaine G, Sester M, Eber F, Chèvre AM, Darmency H. Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Molecular Ecology 2000;11:1419-26.
10. Champolivier J, Gasquez J, Messéan A, Richard-Molard M. Management of transgenic crops within the cropping system. In: Lutman PJW, editor. Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops. British Crop Protection Council Symposium Proceedings No. 72, Farnham, Surrey, UK; 1999. p. 233-40.
11. Messéan A, Sausse C, Gasquez J, Darmency H. Occurrence of genetically modified oilseed rape seeds in the harvest of subsequent conventional oilseed rape over time. European Journal of Agronomy 2007;27:115-22.
12. Hall LM, Topinka L, Huffman J, Davis L, Good A. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Science 2000;48:688-94.
13. Simpson EC, Norris CE, Law JR, Thomas JE, Sweet JB. Gene flow in genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK. In: Lutman PJW, editor. Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops. British Crop Protection Council Symposium Proceedings No. 72, Farnham, Surrey, UK; 1999. p. 75-81.
14. Beckie H, Hall LM, Warwick SI. Impact of herbicide resistant crops as weeds in Canada. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds; 12-15 November 2001; Brighton, UK. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK; 2001. p. 135-42.
15. European Commission. Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming (notified under document number C (2003) 2624). Official Journal L 2003;189:0036-0047 29/07/2003 P.
16. Bewley JD, Black M. Seeds. Physiology of Development and Germination. 2nd ed. Plenum Press New York; 1994.
17. Bewley JD. Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell 1997;9:1055-66.
18. Clark JM. Harvesting losses of spring wheat in windrower/combine and direct combine harvesting systems. Agronomy Journal 1985;77:13-7.
19. Anderson RL, Soper G. Review of volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedling emergence and seed longevity in soil. Weed Technology 2003;17:620-6.
20. Mare DJ. Preservation of dormancy in freshly harvested wheat grain. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1983;34:33-8.
21. Picket AA. A review of seed dormancy in self-sown wheat and barley. Plant Varieties and Seeds 1989;2:131-46.
22. Picket AA. Cereals: seed shedding, dormancy and longevity. Aspects of Applied Biology: Volunteer Crops as Weeds 1993;35:1-8.
23. Komatsuzaki M, Endo O. Seed longevity and emergence of volunteer wheat in upland fields. Weed Research, Japan 1996;41:197-204.
24. Lunn GD, Kettlewell PS, Major BJ, Scott RK. Variation in dormancy duration of the U.K. wheat cultivar Hornet due to environmental conditions during grain development. Euphytica 2002;126:89-97.
25. Harker KN, Clayton GW, Blackshaw RE, O'Donovan JT, Johnson EN, Gan Y, et al. Glyphosate resistant wheat persistence in western Canadian cropping systems. Weed Science 2005;53:846-59.
26. Brûle-Babel AL, Van Acker RC, Friesen LF. Issues related to release of GM wheat: gene flow and selection. Proceedings of the 2002 Manitoba Agronomist Conference, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; 2003. p. 144-51.
27. Anderson RL, Nielsen DG. Emergence pattern of five weed species in the Great Plains. Weed Technology 1996;10:744-9.
28. Leeson JY, Thomas AG, Hall LM, Brenzil CA, Andrews T, Brown KR, et al. Prairie weed surveys of cereal, oilseed and pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre; Weed Survey Series 05-1; 2005.
29. De Corby KA, Van Acker RC, Brûle-Babel AL, Friesen LF. Emergence timing and recruitment of volunteer spring wheat. Weed Science 2007;55:60-9.
30. Chancellor RJ, Froud-Williams RJ. A second survey of cereal weeds in central southern England. Weed Research 1984;24:29-36.
31. Boudry P, Morchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, Van Dijk H. The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1993;87:471-8.
32. Bartsch D, Ellstrand NC. Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1999;99:1120-30.
33. Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H. Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1999;98:1194-201.
34. Sester M, Delanoy M, Colbach N, Darmency H. Crop and density effects on weed beet growth and reproduction. Weed Research 2004;44:50-9.
35. Longden PC. Weed beet: a review. Aspects of Applied Biology 2003;35:185-94.
36. Sester M, Dürr C, Darmency H, Colbach N. Evolution of weed beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed bank: quantification of seed survival, dormancy, germination and pre-emergence growth. European Journal of Agronomy 2006;24:19-25.
37. Desprez M. Observations et remarques sur la montée à graine chez la betterave sucrière. Académie d'agriculture de France: Extrait du procès verbal de la séance du 9 janvier; 9 January 1980. p 44-53.
38. Longden PC. Weed beet resurgence in 1993: the bolters return. British Sugar Beet Review 1993;61:15-17.
39. Sweet J, Simpson E, Law J, Horstman A, Lutman P, Berry K, et al. BRIGHT: botanical and rotational implications of genetically modified herbicide tolerance in winter oilseed rape and sugar beet. Aspects of Applied Biology 2005;74:207-10.
40. Arnaud JF, Viard F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J. Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 2003;270:1565-71.
41. Gruber S, Lutman P, Squire G, Roller A, Albrecht H, Lecomte J. Using the SIGMEA data base to provide an overview of the persistence of seeds of oilseed rape in the context of the coexistence of GM and conventional crops. In: Stein A, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Co-existence between GM and Non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains; 20-22 November 2007; Seville, Spain; 2007. p. 261-2.
42. Price JS, Hobson RN, Neale MA, Bruce DM. Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 1996;65:183-91.
43. Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ, Thomas A. Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seed bank inputs. Weed Science 2003;51:83-6.
44. Pekrun C, Claupein W. Zu den Ausfallverlusten von Raps sowie der Verteilung von Rapssamen und -stroh nach der Ernte. In: Maidl FX, Diepenbrock W, editors. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften, 45. Jahrestagung, 26-28 September 2002, Berlin, Germany; 2002;14:191-2.
45. Simard MJ, Légère A, Pageau D, Lajeunesse J, Warwick SI. The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Quebec cropping systems. Weed Technology 2002;16:433-39.
46. Légère A, Simard MJ, Thomas AG, Pageau D, Lajeunesse J, Warwick SI, et al. Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds; 12-15 November 2001; Brighton, UK. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK; 2001. p. 143-8.
47. Gruber S, Claupein C. Low-dormancy oilseed rape genotypes - what can they contribute to co-existence? In: Stein A, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, editors: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Co-existence between GM and non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains; 20-22 November 2007; Seville, Spain; 2007. p. 259-60.
48. Schlink S. 10 years survival of rape seed (Brassica napus L.) in soil. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 1998;Special Issue XVI:169-72.
49. Roller A, Beismann H, Albrecht H. Persistence of genetically modified, herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape - first observations under practically relevant conditions in South Germany. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 2002; Special Issue XVIII:255-60.
50. Rakouskỳ S, Hraška M, Žaludová J, Riegelová L. Current results of long-term studies on biosafety of GM winter oilseed rape cultivation in the Czech Republic. In: Abstracts of the 23rd World Congress of Czechoslovak Society of Arts and Sciences; 25 June-2 July 2006; České Budějovice, Czech Republik; 2006. p. 117.
51. Lutman PJW, Freeman SE, Pekrun C. The long-term persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in arable fields. Journal of Agricultural Science 2003;141:231-40.
52. Jørgensen T, Hauser TP, Jørgensen RB. Adventitious presence of other varieties in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from seed banks and certified seed. Seed Science Research 2007;17:115-25.
53. Gruber S, Pekrun C, Claupein W. Seed persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus): variation in transgenic and conventionally bred cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science 2004;142:29-40.
54. Pekrun C, Potter TC, Lutman PJW. Genotypic variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape and its impact on the persistence of volunteer rape. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds; 17-20 November 1997; Brighton, UK. Farnham, Surrey, UK; 1997. p. 243-8.
55. Momoh EJJ, Zhou WJ, Kristiansson B. Variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape genotypes under conditions of stress. Weed Research 2002;42:446-55.
56. Gulden RH, Thomas AG, Shirtliffe SJ. Relative contribution of genotype, seed size and environment to secondary seed dormancy potential in Canadian spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Weed Research 2004;44:97-106.
57. Gruber S, Pekrun C, Claupein W. Life cycle and potential gene flow of volunteer oilseed rape in different tillage systems. Weed Research 2005;45:83-93.
58. Fargue A, Meynard JM, Colbach N, Vallée P, Grandeau G, Renard M. Contamination of rapeseed harvest by volunteers of other varieties: a study of intergenotypic competition. European Journal of Agronomy 2004;21:193-207.
59. Colbach N, Fargue A, Sausse C, Angevin F. Evaluation and use of a spatiotemporal model of cropping system effects on gene flow. Example of the GENESYS model applied to three co-existing herbicide tolerance transgenes. European Journal of Agronomy 2005;22:417-40.
60. Gruber S, Claupein W. Emergence and establishment of volunteer oilseed rape in spring and winter crops. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 2008; Special Issue XXI:193-8.
61. Gruber S, Claupein W. Fecundity of volunteer oilseed rape and estimation of potential gene dispersal by a practice-related model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2007;193-8.
62. Maurice D. Emerging weed issues - here to stay? Proceedings of the FarmTech 2004; 28-30 January 2004, Edmonton, AB, Canada; 2004. p. 77-86.
63. Harker KN, Clayton GW, Blackshaw RE, O'Donovan JT, Johnson EN, Gan Y, et al. Persistence of glyphosate-resistant canola in western Canadian cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 2006;98:107-19.
64. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Herbicide resistance management issues in plants with novel traits (PN's); 2002 [cited August 2007]. Available from: URL: http://www.inspection.gc./ca/english/plaveg/bio/resist/disdoce.shtml.
65. Owen MDK, Zelaya, IA. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Management Science 2005;61:301-11.
66. Owen MDK. Maize and soybeans - controllable volunteerism without ferality? In: Gressel J, editor. Crop Ferality and Volunteerism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2005. p. 149-65.
67. Hüsken A, Amman K, Messeguer J, Papa R, Robson PI, Schiemann J, et al. A major European synthesis of data on pollen and seed mediated gene flow in maize in the SIGMEA project. In: Stein A, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Co-existence Between GM and Non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains; 20-22 November 2007; Seville, Spain; 2007. p. 53-6.
68. Van de Wiel CCM, Lotz LAP. Outcrossing of genetically modified with (genetically) unmodified crops: a case study of the situation in the Netherlands. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Science 2006;54:17-35.
69. Melé E, Peñas G, Palaudelmàs M, Serra J, Salvia J, Pla M, et al. Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow. In: Stein A, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Co-existence Between GM and Non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains; 20-22 November 2007; Seville, Spain; 2007. p. 249-50.
70. Johnson B, Barnes J, Gibson K, Weller S. Late season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Crop Management [serial online] September 2004 [cited 30 November 2007]. doi:10.1094/CM-2004-0923-01-BR. Available from: URL: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.com/pub/cm/brief/2004/weeds/ (verified 11 December 2007).
71. Soltani N, Shropshire C, Sikkema PH. Control of volunteer glyphosate-tolerant maize (Zea mays) in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Crop Protection 2006;25:178-81.
72. Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Cuevas FA. Transgenic crops and crop varietal diversity: the case of maize in Mexico. Bioscience 2006;56:503-13.
73. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 2006;35:1633-58.
74. Quist D, Chapela IH. Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 2001;414:541-3.
75. Ellstrand NC, Garner LC, Hedge S, Guadagnuolo R, Blancas L. Spontaneous hybridization between maize and teosinte. Journal of Heredity 2007;98:183-7.
76. Guadagnuolo R, Clegg J, Ellstrand NC. Relative fitness of transgenic vs. non-transgenic maize x teosinte hybrids: a field evaluation. Ecological Applications 2006;16:1967-74.
77. Seefeldt SS, Young FL, Zemetra R, Jones SS. The production of herbicide-resistant jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) x wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids in the field by natural hybridization and management strategies to reduce their occurrence. In: Lutman PJW, editor. Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops. British Crop Protection Council Symposium Proceedings No. 72, Farnham, Surrey, UK; 1999. p. 159-63.
78. Colbach N, Clermont-Dauphin C, Meynard JM. GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping systems on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2001;83:235-53.
79. Pivard S, Adamczyk K, Lecomte J, Lavigne C, Bouvier A, Deville A, et al. Where do the feral oilseed rape populations come from? A large-scale study of their possible origin in a farmland area. Journal of Applied Ecology [serial online, only early articles], 17 August 2007 [cited 2007 December]. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01358.x
80. Yoshimura Y, Beckie HJ, Matsuto K. Transgenic oilseed rape along transportation routes and port of Vancouver in western Canada. Environmental Biosafety Research 2006;5:67-75.
81. Garnier A, Pivard S, Lecomte J. Measuring and modelling anthropogenic secondary seed dispersal along road verges for feral oilseed rape. Basic and Applied Ecology 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.08.014. Available from URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14391791 (verified 18 January 2008).
82. Pessel FD, Lecomte J, Emeriau V, Krouti M, Messéan A, Gouyon PH. Persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2001;102:841-6.
83. Von der Lippe M, Kowarik I. Crop seed spillage along roads: a factor of uncertainty in the containment of GMO. Ecography 2007;30:483-90.
84. Crawley MJ, Brown SL. Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 1995;259:49-54.
85. Matsuo K, Shibaike H, Yoshimura Y, Mizuguti A. Monitoring of feral canola (Brassica napus L.) populations: distribution of GM and non-GM canola originating from spilled seeds around Kashima port, Japan. In: Stein A, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Co-existence between GM and non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains; 20-22 November 2007; Seville, Spain; 2007. p. 273-4.
86. Kim CG, Yi H, Park S, Yeon JE, Kim DY, Kim DI, et al. Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified soybean and maize around cultivated fields and at a grain receiving port in Korea. Journal of Plant Biology 2006;49:218-23.
87. Beckie HJ, Owen MDK. Herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in North America. CAB Reviews [serial online] 2007 [cited 10 September 2007];2:[044]. Available from: URL: http://www.cababstractsplus.org/cabreviews
88. Wicks GA, Felton WL, Murison RD, Martin RJ. Changes in fallow weed species in continuous wheat in northern New South Wales, 1981-1990. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2000;40:831-42.
89. Moss SR. Some effects of burning cereal straw on seed viability, seedling establishment and control of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. Weed Research 1980;20:271-6.
90. Harker KN, Blackshaw RE, Clayton GW, O'Donovan JT, Johnson EN, Gan Y, et al. Defining agronomic implications of RoundUp Ready spring wheat production systems. Final Report. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Lacombe and Beaverlodge Research Centre, Canada; 2004 [cited 10 September 2007]. Available from: URL: http://sci.agr.ca/lacombe/pub/rr65execsum-e.htm
91. Christian DG. Effect of reduced cultivation, ploughing and herbicides on the occurrence of volunteer cereal grains in winter wheat and barley. Aspects of Applied Biology 1993;35:83-8.
92. Gummerson RJ. The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 1986;37:729-41.
93. Gunn JS. Weed beet in other crops of the arable rotation. British Sugar Beet Review 1979;47:7-10.
94. Gestat de Garambé T. Gestion des conséquences agronomiques et environnementales de la culture de betteraves tolérantes à un herbicide non sélectif. In: Proceedings of the XIth International Conference on Weed Biology; 6-8 September 2000; Dijon, France; AFPP Paris, France; 2000. p. 635-42.
95. Pekrun C, Claupein W. The implication of stubble tillage for weed population dynamics in organic farming. Weed Research 2006;46:414-23.
96. Pekrun C, Lutman PJW, Baeumer K. Induction of secondary dormancy in rape seeds (Brassica napus L.) by prolonged imbibition under conditions of water stress or oxygen deficiency in darkness. European Journal of Agronomy 1997;6:245-55.
97. Pekrun C, Lutman PJW. The influence of post-harvest cultivation on the persistence of volunteer oilseed rape. Weed seed banks: determination, dynamics and manipulation. Aspects of Applied Biology 1998;51:113-8.
98. Pekrun C, Hewitt JDJ, Lutman PJW. Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 1998;130:155-63.
99. Pekrun C, Lutman PJW, Büchse A, Albertini A, Claupein W. Reducing gene escape in time by adjusted post-harvest tillage - evidence from field experiments with oilseed rape at 10 sites in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 2006;25:289-98.
100. Lutman PJW, Berry K, Payne RW, Simpson E, Sweet JB, Champion GT, et al. Persistence of seeds from crop of conventional and herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2005;272:1909-15.
101. Pekrun C, Ripfel H, Albertini A, Lutman PJW, Claupein W. Einfluss der Bodenbearbeitung auf die Ausbildung einer Samenbank bei Raps - Ergebnisse von sechs Standorten in England und einem in Österreich. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 1998;11:53-4.
102. Colbach N, Dürr C, Gruber S, Pekrun C. Modelling the seed bank evolution and emergence of oilseed rape volunteers for managing co-existence of GM and non-GM varieties. European Journal of Agronomy 2008;28:19-32.
103. Streit B, Rieger SB, Stamp P, Richner W. Weed populations in winter wheat as affected by crop sequence, intensity of tillage and time of herbicide application in a cool and humid climate. Weed Research 2003;43:20-32.
104. Beckie HJ, Harker N, Hall LM, Warwick SI, Légère A, Sikkema PH, et al. A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2006;86:1243-64.
105. Lawson AN, Van Acker RC, Friesen LE. Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Manitoba. Weed Science 2006;54:873-82.
106. Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ, Thomas AG. Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada. Weed Science 2003;51:904-13.
107. Van Acker RC, Entz M. Agronomic benefits and risks of using RoundUp Ready wheat in western Canada. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Manitoba Agronomists Conference; 10-11 December 2001, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 2001. p. 173-80.
108. Van Acker RC, Brûle-Babel AL, Friesen LF. An Environmental Safety Assessment of RoundupReady Wheat: Risks for Direct Seeding Systems in Western Canada. Report for the Canadian Wheat Board 2003, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Available from: URL: http://www.worc.org/pdfs/WheatCWBEnviroReportJune2003.pdf (verified 12 December 2007).
109. Rainbolt CR, Thill DC, Young F. Control of volunteer herbicide resistant wheat and canola. Weed Technology 2004;18:711-8.
110. Deen W, Hamill A, Shropshire C, Soltani N, Sikkema PH. Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 2006;20:261-6.
111. Dale JE. Soybean weed control by chloramben granules coated with haloxyfop-methyl. Weed Research 1985;25:231-8.
112. Young BG, Hart SE. Control of volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn (Zea mays) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 1997;11:649-55.
113. Hart SE, Wax LM. Review and future prospectus on the impacts of herbicide resistant maize on weed management. Maydica 1999;44:25-36.
114. Brûle-Babel AL, Willenborg CJ, Friesen LF, Van Acker RC. Modelling the influence of gene flow and selection pressure on the frequency of a GE herbicide-tolerant trait in non-GE wheat and wheat volunteers. Crop Science 2006;46:1704-10.
115. Gan YT, Miller PR, McConkey BG, Zentner RP, Stevenson FC, McDonald CL. Influence of diverse cropping sequences on durum wheat yield and protein in the semiarid Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 2003;95:1342-7.
116. Zentner RP, Wall DD, Nagy CN, Smith EG, Young DL, Miller PR, et al. Economics of crop diversification and soil tillage opportunities in the Canadian Prairies. Agronomy Journal 2002;94:216-30.
117. Gaines T, Preston C, Byrne P, Henry WB, Westra P. Adventitious presence of herbicide resistant wheat in certified and farm-saved seed lots. Crop Science 2007;47:751-6.
118. Beck D. No-till Guidelines for Semi-arid Prairies 2005 [cited October 2007]. Available from: URL: http://www.dakotalakes.com/Publications/Guidelines. pdf.
119. Powles SB. Success from adversity: herbicide resistance can drive changes to sustainable weed management systems. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, UK; 1997. p. 1119-26.
120. Pekrun C, Lane PW, Lutman PJW. Modelling seedbank dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Agricultural Systems 2005;84:1-20.
121. Wray MW. A survey of cereal admixture in wheat and barley grain 1988 to 1990. Aspects of Applied Biology - Volunteer Crops as Weeds 1993;35:195-206.
122. Wilson WW, Dahl B. Costs and risks of testing and segregating GM wheat. Report: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics. Agricultural Experiment Station, State University, Fargo, ND, USA. Agribusiness and Applied Economics 2002 October Report No. 501. Available from: URL: http://www.ag.ndsu. nodak.edu/biotech/papers/AE501-p.pdf (verified 11 December 2007).
123. Friesen LF, Nelson A, Van Acker RC. Evidence of contamination of pedigreed canola (Brassica napus) seed lots in western Canada with genetically engineered herbicide resistance traits. Agronomy Journal 2003;95:1342-7.
124. Van Acker RC, Brûle-Babel AL, Friesen LF, Entz MH. GM/non-GM wheat co-existence in Canada: RoundupReady® wheat as a case study. In: Boelt B, editor. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops; 13-14 November 2003; Helsingør, Denmark; 2003. p. 60-8.
125. Klein H. Certified seed production. In: Boelt B, editor. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops; 13-14 November 2003; Helsingør, Denmark; 2003. p. 50-6.
126. Sicard G. Management of varietal purity in seed production in France. In: Boelt B, editor. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops; 13-14 November 2003; Helsingør, Denmark; 2003. p. 57-9.
127. Le Bail M. GMO/non GMO segregation in supply zones of country elevators. In: Boelt B, editor. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops; 13-14 November 2003; Helsingør, Denmark; 2003. p. 125-7.
128. Sester M, Angevin F, Choimet C, Messéan A. Coexistence of genetically modified and non genetically modified beet crops in france and germany: the case of tolerance to a nonselective herbicide. In: Messéan A, et al., editors. New Case Studies on the Coexistence of GM and Non-GM Crops in European Agriculture. Technical Report Series, EUR 22102 EN. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Seville, Spain; 2006.
129. Shaner D, Feist DA, Retzinger EJ. SAMOA: one company's approach to herbicide-resistant weed management. Pesticide Science 1997;51:367-70.
130. Al-Ahmad H, Dwyer J, Moloney M, Gressel J. Mitigation of establishment of Brassica napus transgenes in volunteers using a tandem construct containing a selectively unfit gene. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2006;4:7-21.
131. Fargue A, Colbach N, Meynard JM. Introduction of genotypic effects into GENESYS-RAPE: effects of height and male sterility on gene flow between rape populations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2005;108:318-28.
132. Sebillotte M. Système de culture, un concept opératoire pour les agronomes. Un point sur . . . les systèmes de culture. INRA Éditions, Paris, France; 1990.
133. Rossing WAH, Meynard JM, Van Ittersum MK. Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable systems: case studies from France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Agronomy 1997;7:271-83.
134. Fischer RA. The role of crop simulation models in wheat agronomy. In: Day W, Atkin RK, editors. Wheat Growth and Modelling. Plenum Press New York; 1985. p. 237-55.
135. Squire GR, Burn D, Crawford JW. A model for the impact of herbicide tolerance on the performance of oilseed rape as a volunteer weed. Annals of Applied Biology 1997;131:315-38.
136. Sester M, Dürr C, Darmency H, Colbach N. Modelling the effects of cropping systems on the seed bank dynamics and emergence of weed beet. Ecological Modelling 2007;204:47-58.
137. Sester M, Tricault Y, Darmency H, Colbach N. GENESYS-BEET: a model of the effects of cropping systems on gene flow between sugar beet and weed beet. Field Crops Research. In press 2008.
138. Angevin F, Klein EK, Choimet C, Gauffreteau A, Lavigne C, Messéan A, et al. Modelling impacts of cropping systems and climate on maize cross pollination in agricultural landscapes: the MAPOD model. European Journal of Agronomy 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.010. Available from URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11610301 (verified 4 January 2008).
139. Colbach N, Dürr C, Roger-Estrade J, Caneill J. How to model the effects of farming practices on weed emergence. Weed Research 2005;45:2-17.
140. Colbach N, Clermont-Dauphin C, Meynard JM. GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. II. Genetic exchanges among volunteer and cropped populations in a small region. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2001;83:255-70.