Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada

Weed Science

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 904-913

  Gulden, Robert H ^a   Shirtliffe, Steven J ^a   Thomas, A Gordon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b SASKATOON RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conventional tillage; Secondary dormancy; Seedbank longevity; Seedling recruitment; Zero tillage

Indexed keywords

CANOLA; DORMANCY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENOTYPE; MORTALITY; SEED BANK; TILLAGE;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; SASKATCHEWAN;

BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; SINAPIS ARVENSIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 1842532723     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/P2002-170     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Acton, D. F., G. A. Padbury, and C. T. Stushnoff. 1998. The Ecoregions of Saskatchewan. Winnipeg, MB: Hignell. Pp. 125-156.
2. Cardina, J. and D. H. Sparrow. 1996. A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci. 44:46-51.
3. Clements, D. R., D. L. Benoit, S. D. Murphy, and C. J. Swanton. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44:314-322.
4. Environment Canada. 2002. Canadian Climate Normals 1971 to 2000. www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/climate/climate-normals/show_normals-e.cfm? station_id=1473&prov=SK.
5. Forcella, F., R. G. Wilson, J. Dekker, et al. 1997. Weed seed bank emergence across the corn belt. Weed Sci. 45:67-76.
6. Gulden, R. H., S. J. Shirtliffe, and A. G. Thomas. 2000. Secondary dormancy in volunteer canola (Brassica napus). www.cwss-scm.ca/pdf/ ECW2000Proceedings.pdf.
7. Gulden, R. H., S. J. Shirtliffe, and A. G. Thomas. 2003. Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci. 51:83-86.
8. Gutterman, Y. 1980/1981. Influences on seed germinability: phenotypic maternal effects during maturation. Isr. J. Bot. 29:105-117.
9. Hall, L., K. Topinka, J. Huffman, L. Davis, and A. Good. 2000. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48:688-694.
10. Kirkland, K. J. 1997. Implications of late fall and early spring 2,4-D applications on subsequent canola production on black, dark brown and gray wooded soil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:699-702.
11. Légère, A., M. J. Simard, A. G. Thomas, D. Pageau, J. Lajeunesse, S. I. Warwick, and D. A. Derksen. 2001. Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. Pages 143-148 in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.
12. Lutman, P.J.W. 1993. The occurrence and persistence of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:29-36.
13. Lutman, P.J.W. and F. Lopez-Granados. 1998. The persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Asp. Appl. Biol. 51:147-152.
14. Lutman, P.J.W., R. Risiott, and P. Ostermann. 1996. Investigations into alternative methods to predict the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields. Weed Sci. 44:290-297.
15. Mulugeta, D. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1997. Weed and seedbank management with integrated methods as influenced by tillage. Weed Sci. 45: 706-715.
16. Pekrun, C. 1994. Untersuchungen zur secondären Dormanz bei Raps (Brassica napus L.). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 119 p.
17. Pekrun, C., J. D.J. Hewitt, and P.J.W. Lutman. 1998. Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 130:155-163.
18. Pekrun, C. and P.J.W. Lutman. 1998. The influence of post-harvest cultivation on the persistence of volunteer oilseed rape. Asp. Appl. Biol. 51:113-118.
19. Pekrun, C., T. C. Potter, and P.J.W. Lutman. 1997. Genotypic variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape and its impact on the persistence of volunteer rape. Pages 243-248 in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.
20. Phillips, P.W.B. and H. McNeil. 2000. Labelling for GM food: theory and practice. AgBioForum 3:219-224.
21. Rakow, G. and D. L. Woods. 1987. Outcrossing in rape and mustard under Saskatchewan prairie conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:147-151.
22. Schlink, S. 1994. Ökologie der Keimung und Dormanz von Körneraps (Brassica napus L.) und ihre Bedeutung für eine Überdauerung der Samen im Boden. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 193 p.
23. Simard, M. J., A. Légère, D. Pageau, J. Lajeunesse, and S. Warwick. 2002. The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Quèbec cropping systems. Weed Technol. 16:433-439.
24. Sparrow, S. D., J. S. Conn, and C. W. Knight. 1990. Canola seed survival over winter in the field in Alaska. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:799-807.
25. Thomas, A. G., D. Keiner, R. F. Wise, and B. L. Frick. 1997. Manitoba Weed Survey-Comparing Zero and Conventional Tillage Crop Production Systems 1994. Weed Survey Series Publication 97-1. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 130 p.
26. Wiles, L. J., D. H. Barlin, E. E. Schweizer, H. R. Duke, and D. E. Whitt. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol. 10:35-41.