Crop and density effects on weed beet growth and reproduction

Weed Research

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 50-59

  Sester, M ^a   Delanoy, M ^a   Colbach, N ^a   Darmency, H ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Competition; Density; Gene flow; Model; Risk assessment; Rotation; Seed production; Sugarbeet; Transgenic crop; Weed beet

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSGENIC PLANT; WEED;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; LOLIUM; PISUM SATIVUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 1242300148     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00372.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ALCARAZ G, GENTER T, LAILLET G & RAGEOT D (1998) Biologie du pollen de betteraves sucrières. In: Proceedings 61th International Institute for Beet Research Congress, Brussels, Belgium, 393-399.
2. BARTSCH D & SCHUPHAN I (2002) Lessons we can learn from ecological biosafety research. Journal of Biotechnology 98, 71-77.
3. BOUDRY P, MÖRCHEN M, SAUMITOU-LAPRADE P, VERNET PH & VAN DIJK H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugarbeets. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87, 471-478.
4. BOX GEP, HUNTER WG & HUNTER JS (1978) Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building. Wiley, New York, USA.
5. COUSENS RD (1986) The use of population models in the study of the economics of weed control. In: Proceedings 1986 EWRS Symposium on Economic Weed Control, Stuttgart, Germany, 269-276.
6. DARMENCY H (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: introgression and weediness. Molecular Ecology 3, 37-40.
7. DARMENCY H & GASQUEZ G (1990) Appearance and spread of triazine resistance in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technology 4, 173-177.
8. DESPLANQUE B, BOUDRY P, BROOMBERG K, SAUMITOU-LAPRADE P, CUGUEN J & VAN DIJK H (1999) Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae) assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98, 1194-1201.
9. DÜRR C & BOIFFIN J (1995) Sugarbeet seedling growth from germination to first leaf stage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 427-435.
10. ELLSTRAND NC & HOFFMAN CA (1990) Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. Bioscience 40, 438-442.
11. GESTAT DE GARAMBÉ T (2000) Gestion des conséquences agronomiques et environnementales de la culture de betteraves tolérantes à un herbicide non sėlectif. In: Proceedings 2000 XIème Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon, France, 635-642.
12. GUMMERSON RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugarbeet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729-741.
13. GUNN JS (1979) Weed beet in other crops of the arable rotation. British Sugar Beet Review 47, 7-10.
14. GUNN JS (1982) Population dynamics of weed beet. In: Proceedings 1982 British Crop Protection Conference-Weeds, Brighton, UK, 61-66.
15. GUNN JS & DUNKERTON J (1981) Weed beet through the arable rotation. British Sugar Beet Review 49, 9-10.
16. HORNSEY KG & ARNOLD MH (1979) The origins of weed beet. Annals of Applied Biology 92, 279-285.
17. LEXANDER K (1980) Present knowledge of sugarbeet bolting mechanisms. In: Proceedings 1980 the 43rd Winter Congress of the International Institute for Beet Research, Brussels, Belgium, 245-258.
18. LONGDEN PC (1980) Weed beet. Agricultural Progress 55, 17-25.
19. LONGDEN PC (1989) Effects of increasing weed-beet density on sugar-beet yield and quality. Annals of Applied Biology 114, 527-532.
20. LONGDEN PC (1993) Weed beet: a review. Aspects of Applied Biology, Volunteer Crops as Weeds 35, 185-194.
21. MILFORD GFJ, POCOCK TO & RILEY J (1985) An analysis of leaf growth in sugarbeet. I. Leaf appearance and expansion in relation to temperature under controlled conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 163-172.
22. PACALA SW & SILANDER JA (1985) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single-species models of annuals. The American Naturalist 125, 385-411.
23. SESTER M, COLBACH N & DARMENCY H (2002) Modelling the influence of cropping systems on gene flow from herbicide resistant sugarbeet. Presentation of the model GeneSys-Beet. In: Proceedings 2002 VII Congress of the European Society of Agronomy, Cordoba, Spain, 327-328.
24. VIGOUROUX Y (2000) Betteraves transgéniques et betteraves adventices: étude des flux de gènes et leurs conséquences. PhD Thesis, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
25. VIGOUROUX Y, DARMENCY H, GESTAT DE GARAMBÉ T & RICHARD-MOLARD M (1999) Gene flow between sugarbeet and weed beet. In: Proceedings 1999 Gene Flow and Agriculture, Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Conference, Keele, UK, 83-88.
26. WEIBULL W (1959) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 18, 293-297.