Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems - the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages 23-

  Byskov, Jens ^a   Bloch, Paul ^a   Blystad, Astrid ^b   Hurtig, Anna Karin ^c   Fylkesnes, Knut ^b   Kamuzora, Peter ^d   Kombe, Yeri ^e   Kvåle, Gunnar ^b   Marchal, Bruno ^f   Martin, Douglas K ^g   Michelo, Charles ^h   Ndawi, Benedict ⁱ   Ngulube, Thabale J ^h   Nyamongo, Isaac ^j   Olsen, Øystein E ^a,k   Onyango Ouma, Washington ^j   Sandøy, Ingvild F ^b   Shayo, Elizabeth H ^l   Silwamba, Gavin ^h   Songstad, Nils G ^b   Tuba, Mary ^h   more..

^a DANISH BILHARZIASIS LABORATORY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM   (Tanzania)

^e KENYA MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

^f INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (Belgium)

^g at the University of Toronto Wagner is also a faculty member of the Canadian Medical Associations' Physician Management Institute   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ZAMBIA   (Zambia)

ⁱ Primary Health Care Institute PHCI   (Tanzania)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

^k HAYDOM LUTHERAN HOSPITAL   (Tanzania)

^l National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR)   (Tanzania)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY OF REASONABLENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERVENTION STUDY; KENYA; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; TANZANIA; ZAMBIA;

EID: 70749145586     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-23     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, Pang T, Bhutto Z, Hyder AA. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet 2004, 364(9456):900-6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0, 15351199.
2. Jeppson A, Okuonzi SA, Östergren PO, Hagstrôm B. Using burden of disease/cost effectiveness as an instrument for district health planning: Experiences from Uganda. Health Policy 2004, 70:261-270. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.02.009, 15488993.
3. Holm S. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ 1998, 317(7164):1000-1002.
4. Unger JP, Macq J, Bredo F, Boelart M. Through Mintzberg's glasses: A fresh look at the organisation of ministries of health. Bull World Health Organ 2000, 78(8):1005-14. 2560822, 10994284.
5. Ham C, Coulter A. Global Challenges of Health Care Rationing. 2000, London, UK; Open University Press.
6. Gilson L, Mills A. Health Sector Reforms in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons of the last 10 years. Health Policy 1995, 32(1-3):215-43. 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00737-D, 10156640.
7. Cohen J. Pluralism and Proceduralism. Chicago-Kent Law Review 1994, 69:589-618.
8. Daniels N, Sabin JE. Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for Insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1997, 26(4):303-502. 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x, 11660435.
9. Gilson L. Trust and the development of Health Care as a social institution. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56(7):1453-68. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00142-9, 12614697.
10. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ 2000, 321(7272):1300-1. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300, 1119050, 11090498.
11. Martin D, Singer P. A Strategy to Improve PS in Health Care Institutions. Health Care Anal 2003, 11(1):59-68. 10.1023/A:1025338013629, 14510309.
12. Martin DK, Kapiriri L. Improving priority setting in low and middle income countries: interdisciplinary bioethics in action. Estudios de Bioetica Social 1: Prioridades end Salud y Salud Intercultural 2007, Santiago, Chile: Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioetica, Universidad de Chile, Lolas F, Martin DK, Quezada A.
13. Kapiriri L, Martin DK. A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Developing Countries. Health Care Anal 2007, 15:159-167. 10.1007/s10728-006-0037-1, 17922194.
14. Gruskin S, Daniels N. Process is the Point: Justice and Human Rights: Priority Setting and Fair Deliberative Process. Am J Public Health 2008, 98(9):1573-7. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123182, 18633088.
15. Daniels N, Sabin JE. Accountability for Reasonableness: An update. BMJ 2008, 337:a1850. 10.1136/bmj.a1850, 18845595.
16. Mielke J, Martin DK, Singer PA. Priority Setting in a hospital critical care unit: Qualitative case study. Crit Care Med 2003, 31(12):2764-68. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098440.74735.DE, 14668612.
17. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
18. LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ, Weeks MR, Singer M. Researcher Roles & Research Partnerships. 1999, London: AltaMira Press.
19. Madden S, Martin DK, Downey S, Singer PA. A qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy 2005, 73:10-20.
20. Martin D, Shulman K, Santiago-Sorrell P, Singer P. Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: A qualitative case study. J Health Serv Res Pol 2003, 8,4:197-201. 10.1258/135581903322403254.
21. Kapiriri L, Norhem OF, Martin DK. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 68(4):766-733.
22. Mshana S, Shemhilu H, Ndawi B, Momburi R, Olsen OE, Byskov J, Martin DK. What do District Health Planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for Reasonableness'?. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7:180. 2151948, 17997824, 10.1186/1472-6963-7-180.
23. Olsen T. Bridging the equity gap in maternal and child health. Health systems research is needed to improve implementation. BMJ 2005, 331(7520):844. 1246095, 16210302, 10.1136/bmj.331.7520.844.