메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 10-20

Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: A qualitative case study and evaluation

Author keywords

Accountability for reasonableness; Appeals; Hospital strategic planning; Priority setting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SATISFACTION; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

EID: 19444381514     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.002     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (28)

References (25)
  • 1
    • 0028710316 scopus 로고
    • Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: How is it done, and where is the information coming from?
    • R. Deber, M. Wiktorowicz, P. Leatt, and F. Champagne Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: how is it done, and where is the information coming from? Healthcare Management Forum 7 4 1994 18 27
    • (1994) Healthcare Management Forum , vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp. 18-27
    • Deber, R.1    Wiktorowicz, M.2    Leatt, P.3    Champagne, F.4
  • 5
    • 0036177140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Setting priorities in Canadian Regional Health Authorities: A survey of key decision makers
    • C. Mitton, and C. Donaldson Setting priorities in Canadian Regional Health Authorities: a survey of key decision makers Health Policy 60 2002 39 58
    • (2002) Health Policy , vol.60 , pp. 39-58
    • Mitton, C.1    Donaldson, C.2
  • 6
    • 0034715912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: A qualitative case study
    • P.A. Singer, D.K. Martin, M. Giacomini, and L. Purdy Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a qualitative case study British Medical Journal 321 2000 1316 1318
    • (2000) British Medical Journal , vol.321 , pp. 1316-1318
    • Singer, P.A.1    Martin, D.K.2    Giacomini, M.3    Purdy, L.4
  • 7
    • 0033550686 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: Impact of the evidence threshold
    • R. Foy, J. So, E. Rous, and J.H. Scarffe Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold British Medical Journal 318 1999 456 459
    • (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.318 , pp. 456-459
    • Foy, R.1    So, J.2    Rous, E.3    Scarffe, J.H.4
  • 8
    • 0035904788 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs: A qualitative study
    • D.K. Martin, J.L. Pater, and P.A. Singer Priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative study Lancet 358 2001 1676 1681
    • (2001) Lancet , vol.358 , pp. 1676-1681
    • Martin, D.K.1    Pater, J.L.2    Singer, P.A.3
  • 10
    • 0031217084 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers
    • N. Daniels, and J.E. Sabin Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 4 1997 303 502
    • (1997) Philosophy and Public Affairs , vol.26 , Issue.4 , pp. 303-502
    • Daniels, N.1    Sabin, J.E.2
  • 15
    • 0002282572 scopus 로고
    • Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research
    • N.K. Denzin Y.S. Lincoln Sage Thousand Oaks
    • D.L. Altheide, and J.M. Johnson Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research N.K. Denzin Y.S. Lincoln Handbook of qualitative research 1994 Sage Thousand Oaks p. 485-99
    • (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research
    • Altheide, D.L.1    Johnson, J.M.2
  • 16
    • 0034097460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
    • N. Mays, and C. Pope Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research British Medical Journal 320 2000 50 52
    • (2000) British Medical Journal , vol.320 , pp. 50-52
    • Mays, N.1    Pope, C.2
  • 17
    • 0029008609 scopus 로고
    • Rigour and qualitative research
    • N. Mays, and C. Pope Rigour and qualitative research British Medical Journal 311 1995 109 112
    • (1995) British Medical Journal , vol.311 , pp. 109-112
    • Mays, N.1    Pope, C.2
  • 18
    • 0003998520 scopus 로고
    • Pluralism and proceduralism
    • J. Cohen Pluralism and proceduralism Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 1994 589 618
    • (1994) Chicago-Kent Law Review , vol.69 , pp. 589-618
    • Cohen, J.1
  • 19
    • 54349110135 scopus 로고
    • Columbia University Press New York
    • J. Rawls Political liberalism 1993 Columbia University Press New York
    • (1993) Political Liberalism
    • Rawls, J.1
  • 20
    • 0036018479 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision makers
    • D.K. Martin, M. Giacomini, and P.A. Singer Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision makers Health Policy 61 3 2002 279 290
    • (2002) Health Policy , vol.61 , Issue.3 , pp. 279-290
    • Martin, D.K.1    Giacomini, M.2    Singer, P.A.3
  • 22
    • 0033530478 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tragic choices in health care: Lessons from the Child B case
    • C. Ham Tragic choices in health care: lessons from the Child B case British Medical Journal 319 1999 1258 1261
    • (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.319 , pp. 1258-1261
    • Ham, C.1
  • 24
    • 0141514275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Procedures for priority setting and mechanisms of appeal in the Norwegian health care system
    • Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • O. Norheim Procedures for priority setting and mechanisms of appeal in the Norwegian health care system Presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Priorities in Health Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2000
    • (2000) Presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Priorities in Health
    • Norheim, O.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.