Finding middle ground in second language reading: Pedagogic modifications that increase comprehensibility and vocabulary acquisition while preserving authentic text features

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 512-533

  O'donnell, Mary E ^a  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70749112736     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Alderson J. Assessing reading 2000, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
2. Bachman L. Fundamental considerations in language testing 1990, Oxford, Oxford University Press
3. Bachman L, Palmer A. Language testing in practice 1996, Oxford, Oxford University Press
4. Bacon S, Finnemann M. A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. Modern Language Journal 1990, 74:459-473.
5. Barnett M. Language and literature: False dichotomies, real allies. ADFL Bulletin 1991, 22:7-11.
6. Beck I L, McKeown M G, Omanson R C, Pople M T. Revising social studies text from a text processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. International Reading Association 1991, 26:251-276.
7. Bell F L. Comprehension aids, Internet technologies, and the reading of authentic materials by adult second language readers. 2005, http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-04112005-152127/unrestricted/01_flb_title&contents.pdf, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Available at
8. Berardo S A. The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix 2006, 6:60-69.
9. Berkemeyer V C. Recall protocol data: Some classroom implications. Unterrichtspraxis 1989, 21:131-137.
10. Bernhardt E B. Testing foreign language reading comprehension: The immediate recall protocol. Unterrichtspraxis 1983, 16:27-33.
11. Bernhardt E B, Hulstijn J H, Malter J F. A psycholinguistic perspective on second language literacy. Reading in two languages 1991a, 31-44. In, Eds., pp, Amsterdam, Free University Press
12. Bernhardt E B. Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical and classroom perspectives 1991b, Norwood, NJ, Ablex
13. Bernhardt E B. Teaching literature or teaching students. ADFL Bulletin 1995, 26:5-6.
14. Blau E K. The effects on syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly 1982, 16:517-528.
15. Britton B K, Gulgoz S. Using Kintsch's model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991, 83:329-345.
16. Brown R. A comparison of the comprehensibility of modified and unmodified ESL reading material. 1985, Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Manoa
17. Brown R. A comparison of the comprehensibility of modified and unmodified reading materials for ESL. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 1987, 6:49-79.
18. Carrell P L, Orem R, Haskell J. Culture-specific schemata in L2 comprehension. Selected papers from the Ninth Illinois TESOL/BE Annual Convention, First Midwest TESOL Conference 1981, 123-132. In, Eds., pp, Chicago, TESOL/BE
19. Chung H. Effects of elaborative modifications on second language reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 1995, 14:27-61.
20. Coady J, Coady J, Huckin T. L2 vocabulary acquisition: A synthesis of the research. Second language vocabulary acquisition 1997, 273-290. In, Eds., pp, New York, Cambridge University Press
21. Crossley S A, Louwerse M M, McCarthy P M, McNamara D S. A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Language Journal 2007, 91:15-30.
22. Davis J. Reading literature in the foreign language: The comprehension/response connection. The French Review 1992, 65:359-367.
23. Day R, Bamford J. Extensive reading in the second language classroom 1998, Cambridge, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge
24. Derwing T M. Elaborative detail: Help or hindrance to the NNS listener. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1996, 18:283-297.
25. Haastrup K. Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words 1991, Tübingen, Germany, Gunter Narr
26. Hammadou Sullivan J A, Hammadou Sullivan J A. Advanced foreign language readers' inferencing. Literacy and the second language learner 2001, 217-237. In, Ed., pp, Greenwich, CT, IAP
27. Honeyfield J. Simplification. TESOL Quarterly 1977, 11:431-440.
28. Horiba Y. The role of causal reasoning and language competence in narrative comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1993, 15:49-81.
29. Hulstijn J H, Arnaud P J L, Bejoint H. Retention of referred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. Vocabulary and applied linguistics 1992, 113-125. In, Eds., pp, London, Macmillan
30. Hulstijn J, Hollander M, Greidanus T. Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal 1996, 80:327-339.
31. Jacobs G M. What lurks in the margin: Use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language reading. Issues in Applied Linguistics 1994, 5:115-137.
32. Kim Y. Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly 2006, 40:341-373.
33. Kintsch W, van Dijk T A. Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 1978, 85:363-394.
34. Knight S. Dictionary: The tool of last resort in foreign language reading? A new perspective. Modern Language Journal 1994, 78:285-299.
35. Koda K. The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. Modern Language Journal 1992, 76:502-512.
36. Koda K. L2 word recognition research: A critical review. Modern Language Journal 1996, 80:450-460.
37. Kramsch C. Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse. Modern Language Journal 1985, 69:356-366.
38. Kutner M H, Nachtsheim C J, Neter J. Applied linear regression models 2004, 4th ed., Chicago, Irwin Professional
39. Lee J F. On the use of recall task to measure L2 reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1986, 8:201-211.
40. Lee J F, Burmeister H, Rounds P L. A review of empirical comparisons of non-native reading behaviors across stages of language development. Variability in second language acquisition 1990, 453-472. In, Eds., pp, Eugene, University of Oregon Press
41. Lee S -K. Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning 2007, 57:87-118.
42. Leow R P. The effects of input enhancement and text length in adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake of second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning 1997, 8:151-182.
43. Long M H. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1983, 5:177-193.
44. Long M H, Jacobs G M. Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and responses 1997, 148-169. In, Ed., pp, Singapore, SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
45. Long M H. Problems in SLA 2007, New York, Erlbaum
46. Long M H, Ross S, Tickoo M. Modifications that preserve language and content. Simplification: Theory and application 1993, 29-52. In, Ed., Anthology Series 31, pp, Singapore: Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization
47. Maxim H H. A study into the feasibility and effects of reading extended authentic discourse in the beginning language classroom. Modern Language Journal 2002, 86:20-35.
48. Mondria J, Wit-De Boer M. The effects of contextual richness on the guessability and the retention of words in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics 1991, 12:249-265.
49. Morgan G A, Leech N L, Gloeckner G W, Barrett K C. SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation 2004, 2nd ed., Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
50. Muljani D, Koda K, Moates D R. The development of word recognition in the second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 1998, 19:99-113.
51. Nuttell C. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language 1996, 2nd ed., London, Heinemann
52. Oh S Y. Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly 2001, 35:69-96.
53. Paribakht T, Wesche M. Reading and incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1999, 21:195-224.
54. Parker K, Chaudron C. The effects of linguistic simplification and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 1987, 6:107-133.
55. Pressley M, Afflerbach P. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading 1995, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
56. Pulido D. Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning 2003, 53:233-284.
57. Ross S, Long M H, Yano Y. Simplification or elaboration? The effects of two types of text modifications on foreign language reading comprehension. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 1991, 10:1-32.
58. Rott S. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1999, 21:589-619.
59. Schmidt R. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning 1995, Honolulu, University of Hawai'i Press
60. Schulz R A. Literature and readability: Bridging the gap in foreign language reading. Modern Language Journal 1981, 65:43-53.
61. Shanahan D. Articulating the relationship between language, literature, and culture: Toward a new agenda for foreign language teaching and research. Modern Language Journal 1997, 81:164-174.
62. Sharwood Smith M. Second language learning: Theoretical foundations 1994, London, Longman
63. Swaffar J K. Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. Modern Language Journal 1985, 69:15-34.
64. Tsang W K. Text modification in ESL reading comprehension. RELC Journal 1987, 18:31-44.
65. Tweissi A I. The effects of the amount and type of simplification on foreign language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 1998, 11:191-204.
66. Urano K. Lexical simplification and elaboration: Sentence comprehension and incidental vocabulary acquisition 2000, Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Manoa
67. Watanabe Y. Incidental learning of vocabulary: Retention of inferred meanings versus given meanings 1992, Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Manoa
68. Widdowson H G, Fanselow J F, Crymes R T. The authenticity of language data. On TESOL '76 1976, 261-270. In, Eds., pp, Washington, DC, TESOL
69. Widdowson H G. Context, community, and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly 1998, 32:705-716.
70. Wolf D F. A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure foreign language reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal 1993, 77:473-489.
71. Yano Y, Long M H, Ross S. The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning 1994, 44:189-219.
72. Zayas-Bazán E, Bacon S, García D. Conexiones: Comunicacion y cultura 2002, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson