The ethics of rapport: Institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 178-199

  Wong, Mun L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10644226301     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107780049800400203     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137-162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
2. Balbo, L. (1987). Crazy quilts: Rethinking the welfare state debate from a women's point of view In A. S. Sasoon (Ed.), Women and the state (pp. 45-71). London: Hutchinson.
3. Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman Boston: Beacon.
4. Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart Boston: Beacon.
5. Bhavnani, K.K. (1990). What's power got to do with it? Empowerment and social research In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp.141-152). London: Routledge.
6. Borland, K. (1991). That's not what I said: Interpretive conflict in oral narrative research In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 63-76). New York: Routledge.
7. Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M.G. (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experiences Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Finch, J. (1984). It's great to have someone to talk to: The ethics and politics of interviewing women In H. Roberts & C. Bell (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70-87). London: Routledge.
9. Fine, M. (1992). Disrupted voices Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphen: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research In N. R. Denzin & Y S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Fine, M., & Weiss, L. (1992). Reconciling voices of hope and despair (Grant proposal to the Spencer Foundation).
12. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weesen-Rosenbaum, S., & Wong, L.M. (1998). Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Fraser, N. (1993). Clintonism, welfare and the anti-social wage: The emergence of a neoliberal political imaginary Rethinking Marxism, 6(1), 9-23.
14. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and practice: "The field" as site, method, and location in anthropology In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1-46). Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question and the privilege of partial perspective Feminist Studies, 14(3), 31-45.
17. Hornstein, G.A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas and implications In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 1-34). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Hornstein, G.A. (1994). The ethics of ambiguity: Feminists writing women's lives In C. E. Franz & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Women creating lives: Identities, resilience and resistance (pp. 51-70). Boulder, CO: Westview.
19. Katz, C. (1996). The expeditions of conjurers: Ethnography, power and pretense In D. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 170-184). Boulder, CO: Westview.
20. Kondo, D.K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern New York: Routledge.
22. Lykes, M.B. (1989). Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian women: Critical perspectives on constructing collaborative research In R. Unger (Ed.), Social construction of gender (pp. 167-185). New York: Baywood.
23. Magyar, M.J. (1992, July). Easier said than done New Jersey Reporter, 27-31.
24. Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge.
25. Mies, M. (1990). Women's research or feminist research? The debate surrounding feminist science and methodology In M. M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship in lived research (pp. 60-84). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Mischler, E. (1986). Research interviewing Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. New Jersey Welfare Reform Act, 204th Legislature, 2nd Sess., ch. 321-528 (1991).
28. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research, (pp. 30-61). New York: Routledge.
29. Patai, D. (1991). U.S. academics and third world women: Is ethical research possible? In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words. New York: Routledge.
30. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Rollins, J. (1985). Between women Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32. Roman, L. (1993). Double exposure: The politics of feminist materialist ethnography Educational Theory, 43(3), 279-308.
33. Stacey, J. (1991). Can there be a feminist ethnography? In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 111-120). New York: Routledge.
34. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35. Wolf, D.L. (1996). Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork Boulder, CO: Westview.
36. Wong, L.M. (1997). Disrupted journeys: Women, welfare and workfare Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, Graduate Center.
37. Young, I.M. (1994). Punishment, treatment, empowerment: Three approaches to policy for pregnant addicts Feminist Studies, 20(1), 33-58.