A discourse that disciplines, governs, and regulates: The national research council's report on scientific research in education

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 96-110

  Bloch, Marianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

"good" and "rigorous" educational research; National Research Council report on educational research; Power and knowledge relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745668602     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403259482     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson-Leavitt, K., Bloch, M., & Soumare, A. (1998). Inside classrooms in Guinea: Girls' experiences. In M. N. Bloch, J. Beoku-Betts, & B. R. Tabachnick (Eds.), Women and education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Power, opportunities, and constraints (pp. 99-130). Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner.
2. Apple, M. (1994). Official knowledge. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
3. Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its themes on women. New York: Pergamon.
4. Bleier, R. (Ed.). (1991). Feminist approaches to science. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Bloch, M. N. (1987). Becoming scientific and professional: Critical perspectives on the history of early childhood education. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of school subjects (pp. 25-62). London: Falmer.
6. Bloch, M. N. (1989). Young boys' and girls' play at home and in the community: A cultural-ecological framework. In M. N. Bloch & A. D. Pellegrini (Eds.), The ecological context of children's play (pp. 120-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Bloch, M.N. (2003). Global/local analyses of the construction of "family-child welfare". In M.N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, and T.S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing the children, family, and education: Restructuring the welfare state (pp. 195-230). New York: Palgrave Publishing Co.
8. Bloch, M. N. (2003a, February). Play, literacy, and educational debates about standards/assessments. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Play, Charlottesville, SC.
9. Bloch, M. N., Holmlund, K., Moqvist, I., & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.). (2003). Governing the child, family, and education: Restructuring the welfare state. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
10. Cannella, G. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
12. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Finn, C., Jr. (2001). Trouble ahead? Philanthropy, 15(3), 36-37.
14. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michel Foucault (C. Gordon, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
15. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality: The use of pleasure (Vol. 2, R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
16. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1979)
17. Gross, P. R., Levitt, N., & Lewis, M. (1997). The flight from science to reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
18. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge Press.
20. Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/ Postmodernism (pp. 190-233). London: Routledge.
21. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge Press.
22. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 26-31.
24. Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
25. Lagemann, E. C. (2002, January 24). Usable knowledge in education. A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors. In Annual report of the Spencer Foundation-2002. Chicago: The Spencer Foundation. Available at www.usableknowledgeσpencer.org
26. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
27. McNeil, L. (in press). Faking equity: High stakes testing and the education of Latino youth. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Assessment and educational equity: Why Texas style accountability fails. New York: State University of New York Press.
28. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds., Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Popkewitz, T. (1998a). The culture of redemption and the administration of freedom as research: The redemptive culture of the educational sciences. The Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 1-34.
30. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998b). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of reason in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 535-570.
31. Popkewitz, T. S., & Bloch, M. N. (2001). Administering freedom: A history of the present (rescuing the parent to rescue the child for society). In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), The changing child in a changing world (pp. 85-118) London: Routledge.
32. Reynolds, A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers (Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper No. 1245-02). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
33. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. (Eds.). (1984). Children's learning in the "zone of proximal development". San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 22-40). New York: Routledge.
36. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
37. Swadener, B. B., & Lubeck, S. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families "at promise": Deconstructing the discourse of risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Wagner, P. (2001). History and theory in the social sciences: Not all that is solid melts into air. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Wallerstein, I. M. (2001). Unthinking social science: The unity of 19th century paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41. Weisner, T.S., Gibson, C., Lowe, E.D., & Ramich, J. (2002). Understanding working poor families in the New Hope Program. Poverty research news, 6 (4). Available at www.jcpr.org/newsletters/vol6_No4/ index.html
42. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.