From DNA sequence to plant phenotype: Bioinformatics meets crop science

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 173-176

  Faccioli, Primetta ^a   Stanca, Antonio Michele ^a   Morcia, Caterina ^a   Terzi, Valeria ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Agricultural omics; Crop systems biology; Genotype to phenotype gap; Interdisciplinary collaboration

Indexed keywords

BIOTIC;

'OMICS'; AGRICULTURAL -OMIC; AGRONOMIC TRAITS; CROP SYSTEM BIOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GENOTYPE TO PHENOTYPE GAP; INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS; MULTILEVELS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

PLANT DISEASES;

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROP IMPROVEMENT; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE INTERACTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

EID: 70450240993     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489309789071066     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Evans LT. Feeding the 10 billion. Plants and population growth. Cambridge University press, UK 1998.
2. st century. J Exp Bot 2000; 51: 1-8.
3. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant response to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003; 218: 1-14. (Pubitemid 38097908)
4. Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, et al. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res 2008; 105: 1-14. (Pubitemid 351625508)
5. Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Crosatti C, Guerra D, Stanca AM, Cattivelli L. Abiotic stress response in plants: when posttranscriptional and post-translational regulations control transcription. Plant Sci 2008; 174: 420-431
6. Tuberosa R, Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci 2006; 11: 405-412 (Pubitemid 44108707)
7. Pennisi E. The greening of plant genomics. Science 2007; 317: 17.
8. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007; 449: 463-467
9. Moolhuijzen P, Dunn DS, Bellgard M, et al. Wheat genome structure and function: genome sequence data and the International wheat genome sequencing consortium. Aust J Agricult Res 2007; 58: 470-475 (Pubitemid 47012065)
10. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PloS One 2007; 2: e1326
11. Faccioli P, Pecchioni N, Cattivelli L, Stanca AM, Terzi V. Expressed sequence tags from cold-acclimatized barley identify novel plant genes. Plant Breeding 2001; 120: 497-502 (Pubitemid 34067436)
12. Moser C, Segala C, Fontana P, et al. Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags from different organs of Vitis vinifera L. Funct Integr Genomics 2005; 5: 208-217 (Pubitemid 41435173)
13. Edwards D, Batley J. Plant bioinformatics: from genome to phenome. Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22: 232-237
14. Atienza SG, Faccioli P, Perrotta G, et al. Large scale analysis of transcripts abundance in barley subjected to several single and combined abiotic stress conditions. Plant Sci 2004; 167(6): 1359-1365 (Pubitemid 39290034)
15. Chenu K, Chapman SC, Hammer GL, McLean G, Salah HBH, Tardieu F. Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. Plant Cell Environ 2008; 31: 378-391 (Pubitemid 351207260)
16. Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu Rev Genom Human Gen 2001; 2: 343-372 (Pubitemid 35265011)
17. Edmeades GO, McMaster GS, White JW, Campos H. Genomics and the physiologist: bridging the gap between genes and crop response. Field Crop Res 2004; 90: 5-18. (Pubitemid 39282827)
18. Xinyou Y, Struik PC. Applying modeling experiences from the past to shape crop systems biology: the need to converge crop physiology and functional genomics. New Phytol 2008; 179: 629-642
19. King GJ. Bioinformatics: harvesting information for plant and crop science. Sem Cell Dev Biol 2004; 15: 721-731
20. Rhee SY, Dickerson J, Xu D. Bioinformatics and its applications to plant biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006; 57: 335-360 (Pubitemid 44061028)
21. Struik PC, Cassman KG, Koornneef M. A dialogue on interdisciplinary collaboration to bridge the gap between plant genomics and crop sciences. In: Spiertz JHJ, Struik PC, van Laar HH Eds. Scale and complexity in plant systems research: gene-plant-crop relations. Springer 2007; 319-328
22. Wollenweber B, Porter JR, Lubberstedt T. Need for multidisciplinary research towards a second green revolution. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005; 8: 337-341
23. Lussier YA, Liu Y. Computational approaches to phenotyping- High throughput phenomics. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007; 4: 18-25. (Pubitemid 46067558)
24. Miller ND, Parks BM, Spalding EP. Computer-vision analysis of seedling responses to light and gravity. Plant J 2007; 52: 374-381
25. Dawo MI, Sanders FE, Pilbeam DJ. Yield, yield components and plant architecture in the F3 generation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) derived from a cross between the determinate cultivar 'Prelude' and an indeterminate landrace. Euphytica 2007; 156: 77-87.
26. Yang XC, Hwa CM. Genetic modification of plant architecture and variety improvement in rice. Heredity 2008; 101: 396-404
27. Wang BH, Wu YT, Huang NT, Zhu XF, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ. QTL mapping for plant architecture traits in upland cotton using RILS an SSR markers. Acta Genet Sin 2006; 33: 161-170
28. Conway G, Toenniessen G. Feeding the world in the twenty-first century. Nature 1999; 402: C55-C58.
29. Sultan SE. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci 2000; 5: 537-542
30. Debat V, David P. Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol Evolut 2001; 16: 555-561 (Pubitemid 32831577)
31. Jamieson PD, Brooking IR, Semenov MA, McMaster GS, White JW, Porter JR. Reconciling alternative models of phenological development in winter wheat. Field Crop Res 2007; 103: 36-41.
32. Vos J, Heuvenlink E. Concepts to model growth and development of plants. In: Plant Growth Modeling and Applications: Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualisation and Application. Los Alamitos: IEEE, Beijing, China, 2006; 3-10.
33. Bossinger G, Rohde W, Lundqvist U, Salamini F. Genetics of barley development: mutant phenotypes and molecular aspects. In: Shewry PR Ed. Barley: genetics, molecular biology and biotechnology. CAB International, Wallingford 1992; pp. 231-263
34. Pozzi C, Faccioli P, Terzi V, et al. Genetics of mutations affecting the development of a barley floral bract. Genetics 2000; 154(3): 1335-1346 (Pubitemid 30140717)
35. Forster BP, Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U, Lyon J, Pitkethly I, Thomas WTB. The barley phytomer. Ann Botany 2007; 100: 725-733
36. Mabee PM. Integrating evolution and development: the need for bioinformatics in evo-devo. BioSci 2006; 56: 301-309
37. Avraham S, Tung C, Ilic K, Jaiswal P, Kellogg EA, McCouch S. The plant ontology database: a community resource for plant structure and developmental stages controlled vocabulary and annotations. Nucleic Acid Res 2008; 36: D449-D454.
38. Wellmer F, Riechmann JL. Gene network analysis in plant development by genomic technologies. Int J Dev Biol 2005; 49: 745-759 (Pubitemid 41615623)
39. Mele G, Hake S. Expression profiling of plant development. Genome Biol 2003; 4: 215.
40. Efroni I, Blum E, Goldshmidt A, Eshed Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008; 20: 2293-2306 (Pubitemid 352844600)
41. Faccioli P, Provero P, Hermann C, Stanca AM, Morcia C, Terzi V. From single genes to co-expression networks: extracting knowledge from barley functional genomics. Plant Mol Biol 2005; 58: 739-750 (Pubitemid 41297951)
42. Fourcaud T, Zhang X, Stokes A, Lambers H, Körner C. Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models. Ann Botany 2008; 101: 1053-1063
43. Xinyou Y, Struik PC, Kropff MJ. Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends Plant Sci 2004; 9: 426-432
44. Juenger TE, McKay JK, Hausmann N, et al. Identification and characterization of QTL underlying whole plant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: σ13C, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 2005; 28: 697-708 (Pubitemid 40886102)
45. Tardieu F. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 2003; 8: 9-14. (Pubitemid 36725961)
46. Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AHCM. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementarity role in plant breeding. Agron J 2003; 95: 90-98.
47. Uptmoor R, Schrag T, Stutzel H, Esch E. Crop model based QTL analysis across environments and QTL based estimation of time to floral induction and flowering in Brassica oleracea. Mol Breed 2008; 21: 205-216
48. Butte AJ. Translational bioinformatics: coming of age. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 709-714
49. Beavis WD, Schilkey FD, Baxter SM. Translational bioinformatics: at the interface of genomics and quantitative genetics. Crop Sci 2007; 47: S32-S43.
50. Faccioli P, Ciceri GP, Provero P, Stanca AM, Morcia C, Terzi V. A combined strategy of "in silico" transcriptome analysis and web search engine optimization allows an agile identification of reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies. Plant Mol Biol 2007; 63: 679-688
51. Liang C, Jaiswal P, Hebbard C, et al. Gramene: a growing plant comparative genomics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: D947-D953.