A new theory of structure-from-motion perception

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1-20

  Fernandez, Julian M ^a   Farell, Bart ^a  

^a Syracuse Institute for Sensory Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Affine structure; Kinetic depth effect; Shape perception; Structure from motion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION;

EID: 70449723036     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Braunstein, M. L., Liter, J. C., & Tittle, J. S. (1993). Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 598-614.
2. Caudek, C., & Domini, F. (1998). Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 609-621.
3. Cornilleau-Pérès, V., & Droulez, J. (1989). Visual perception of curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 351-364.
4. Di Luca, M., Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2004). Spatial integration in structure from motion. Vision Research, 44, 3001-3013.
5. Domini, F., & Braunstein, M. L. (1998). Recovery of 3-D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1273-1295.
6. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (1999). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 426-444.
7. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2003). 3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory. Trends Cognitive Science, 7, 444-449.
8. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1111-1129.
9. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Richman, S. (1998). Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1164-1174.
10. Eagle, R. A., & Blake, A. (1995). Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks. Vision Research, 35, 2927-2941.
11. Eagle, R. A., & Hogervorst, M. A. (1999). The role of perspective information in the recovery of 3D structure-from-motion. Vision Research, 39, 1713-1722.
12. Fernandez, J. M., & Farell, B. (2007). Shape constancy and depth-order violations in structure from motion: A look at non-frontoparallel axes of rotation. Journal of Vision, 7(7):3, 1-18, http://journalofvision.org/7/7/3/, doi:10.1167/7.7.3.
13. Fernandez, J. M., Watson, B., & Qian, N. (2002). Computing relief structure from motion with a distributed velocity and disparity representation. Vision Research, 42, 883-898.
14. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements and actions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179-192.
15. Hildreth, E. C., Ando, H., Andersen, R. A., & Treue, S. (1995). Recovering three-dimensional structure from motion with surface reconstruction. Vision Research, 35, 117-137.
16. Hogervorst, M., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1993). Perception of metric depth from motion parallax. Perception, 22, 101.
17. Hogervorst, M. A., & Eagle, R. A. (1998). Biases in threedimensional structure-from-motion arise from noise in the early visual system. Proceedings: Biological Science, 265, 1587-1593.
18. Hogervorst, M. A., & Eagle, R. A. (2000). The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 934-955.
19. Hogervorst, M. A., Kappers, A. M., & Koenderink, J. J. (1997). Monocular discrimination of rigidly and nonrigidly moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1266-79.
20. Kaplan, W. (1952). Advanced calculus. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
21. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 8, 377-385.
22. Liter, J. C., Braunstein, M. L., & Hoffman, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multi-view displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
23. Loomis, J. M., & Eby, D. W. (1988). Perceiving structure from motion: Failure of shape constancy. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 383-391). Washington, D.C.: Computer Society of the IEEE.
24. Norman, J. F., & Lappin, J. S. (1992). The detection of surfaces defined by optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 386-396.
25. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
26. Perrone, J. A., & Stone, L. S. (1998). Emulating the visual receptive-field properties of MST neurons with a template model of heading estimation. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 5958-5975.
27. Pollick, F. E., Nishida, S., Koike, Y., & Kawato, M. (1994). Perceived motion in structure from motion: Pointing responses to the axis of rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 91-109.
28. Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (1998). A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Research, 38, 743-761.
29. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, F. N. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived threedimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678.
30. Todd, J. T. (1998). Theoretical and biological limitations on the visual perception of 3D structure from motion. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level motion processing-Computational, neurophysiological and psychophysical perspectives (pp. 359-380). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
32. Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
33. Treue, S., Andersen, R. A., Ando, H., & Hildreth, E. C. (1995). Structure-from-motion: Perceptual evidence for surface interpolation. Vision Research, 35, 139-148.
34. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Ullman, S. (1984). Maximizing rigidity: The incremental recovery of 3-d structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception, 13, 255-274.
36. Werkhoven, P., & van Veen, H. A. (1995). Extraction of relief from visual motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 645-656.