Integration of gradient based and response surface methods to develop a cascade optimisation strategy for Y-shaped tube hydroforming process design

Advances in Engineering Software

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 336-348

  Di Lorenzo, Rosa ^a   Ingarao, Giuseppe ^a   Chinesta, Francisco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Cascade optimisation; Moving least squares; Response surface method; Steepest descent method; Tube hydroforming

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; FORMING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TUBULAR STEEL STRUCTURES;

MOVING LEAST SQUARES; OPTIMISATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STEEPEST DESCENT METHOD; TUBE HYDROFORMING;

TUBES (COMPONENTS);

EID: 70449720811     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Meinders T., Burchitza I.A., Bonte M.H.A., and Lingbeek R.A. Numerical product design: springback prediction, compensation and optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48 (2008) 499-514
2. Fann K., and Hsiao P. Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 140 1-3 (2003) 520-524
3. Kleinermann J., and Ponthot J. Parameter identification and shape/process optimization in metal forming simulation. J Mater Process Technol 139 1-3 (2003) 521-526
4. Ponthot J., and Kleinermann J. Optimisation methods for initial/tool shape optimisation in metal forming processes. Int J Vehicle Des 39 1-2 (2005) 14-24
5. Naceur H.A., Batoz J., Guo Y., and Knopf-Lenoir C. Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 250-262
6. Jirathearanat S, Altan T. Optimization of loading paths for tube hydroforming. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA; 2004.
7. Lin Z., Juchen X., Xinyun W., and Guoan H. Optimization of die profile for improving die life in the hot extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 142 3 (2003) 659-664
8. Zhao G., Ma X., Zhao X., and Grandhi R. Studies on optimization of metal forming processes using sensitivity analysis methods. J Mater Process Technol 147 (2004) 217-228
9. Schenk O., and Hillmann M. Optimal design of metal forming die surfaces with evolution strategies. Comput Struct 82 (2004) 1695-1705
10. Abedrabbo N, Zafar N, Averill R, Pourboghrat F, Sidhu R. Optimization of a tube hydroforming process. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA; 2004.
11. Poursina M, Antonio C, Parvizian J, Sousa L, Castro C. Eliminating folding defect in forging parts using a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of ESAFORM, Salerno, Italy; 2003.
12. Do T, Fourment L, Laroussi M. Sensitivity analysis and optimization algorithms for 3D forging process design. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA; 2004.
13. Fourment L, Do T, Habbal A, Bouzaiane A. Gradient non gradient and hybrid algorithms for optimizing 2D and 3D forging sequences. In: Proceeding of ESAFORM, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 2005.
14. Castro C., Antonio C., and Sousa L. Optimisation of shape and process parameters in metal forging using genetic algorithms. J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 356-364
15. Jansson M., Nilsson L., and Simonsson K. On process parameter estimation for the tube hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 190 (2007) 1-11
16. Sheng Z., Jirathearanat S., and Altan T. Adaptive FEM simulation for prediction of variable blank holder force in conical cup drawing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44 (2004) 487-494
17. Labergere C, Gelin JC. New strategies for optimal control of command laws for tube hydroforming processes. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA; 2004.
18. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2nd ed. (2002), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (USA)
19. Breitkopf P., Naceur H., Rassineux A., and Villon P. Moving least squares response surface approximation: formulation and metal forming applications. Comput Struct 83 (2005) 1411-1428
20. Jansson T., Andersson A., and Nilsson L. Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part-an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 159 (2005) 234-426
21. Naceur H, Ben-Elechi S, Knopf-Lenoir C, Batoz J. Response surface methodology for the design of sheet metal forming parameters to control springback effects using the inverse approach. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA; 2004.
22. Naceur H., Guo Y.Q., and Ben-Elechi S. Response surface methodology for design of sheet forming parameters to control springback effects. Comput Struct 84 (2006) 1651-1663
23. Buranathiti T., Cao J., Baghdasaryan L., Chen W., and Xia C. Approaches for model validation: methodology and illustration on a sheet metal flanging process. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 128 (2006) 588-597
24. Oudjene M., Ben-Ayed L., Delameziere A., and Batoz J.L. Shape optimisation of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with Moving Least-Square approximation. J Mater Process Technol 209 (2009) 289-296
25. Gurlebeck K, Konke C. Adaptive response surface approach using artificial neural network and moving least squares. In: Proceedings of seventeenth international conference on the application of computer science and mathematics in architecture and civil engineering, Weimar, Germany; 12-14 July, 2006.
26. Belytschko T., Krongauz Y., Organ D., Fleming M., and Krysl P. Meshless method: an overview and recent development. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139 (1996) 3-47
27. Belytschko T., Lu Y.Y., and Gu L. Crack propagation by element-free galerkin-methods. Eng Fract Mech 51 2 (1995) 295-315
28. Most T, Bucher C. An enhanced moving least squares interpolation for the element-free galerkin method III. In: Proceedings of European conference on computational mechanics solids, structures and coupled problems in engineering, Lisbon, Portugal; 5-8 June, 2006.
29. Rassineux P., and Villon B.P. Simultaneous surface and tetrahedron mesh adaptation using meshfree techniques. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57 (2003) 371-389
30. Ahmetoglu M., and Altan T. Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98 (2000) 25-33
31. Yang J., and Jeon B.S. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 113 (2001) 666-672
32. Zadeh H.K., and Mashhadi M.M. Finite element simulation and experiment in tube hydroforming of unequal T shapes. J Mater Process Technol 177 (2006) 684-687
33. Imaninejad M., Subhash G., and Lokus A. Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45 (2005) 1504-1514
34. Ray P., and Mac Donald B.J. Determination of the optimal load path for tube hydroforming processes using a fuzzy load control algorithm and finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 41 (2004) 173-192
35. Manabe K., Suetake M., Koyama H., and Yang M. Hydroforming process optimization of aluminium alloy tube using intelligent control technique. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46 (2006) 1207-1211
36. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Micari F. Process parameters calibration in 3D tube hydroforming processes. In: Proc. Esaform'07; 2007. p. 411-6.
37. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Gagliardi F, Filice L. Experimental validation of optimisation strategies in hydroforming of T-shaped tubes. In: Proceeding Esaform'08; 2008.
38. Jirathearanat S., Hartl C., and Altan T. Hydroforming of Y-shapes product and process design using FEA simulation and experiments. J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 124-129
39. Ponthot J.P., and Kleinermann J. A cascade optimization methodology for automatic parameter identification and shape/process optimization in metal forming simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 5472-5508
40. Di Lorenzo R., Ingarao G., and Chinesta F. A gradient-based decomposition approach to optimize pressure path and counterpunch action in Y-shaped tube hydroforming operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 10.1007/s00170-008-1813-x [Springer-Verlag London Limited]
41. Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments. 4th ed. (1997), Wiley, New York
42. Doltsinis I. Inelastic deformation processes with random parameters - methods of analysis and design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192 (2003) 2405-2423
43. Ingarao G., Di Lorenzo R., and Micari F. Internal pressure and counterpunch action design in Y-shaped tube hydroforming processes: a multi-objective optimisation approach. Comput Struct 87 (2009) 591-602