On process parameter estimation for the tube hydroforming process

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 190, Issue 1-3, 2007, Pages 1-11

  Jansson, Mikael ^a   Nilsson, Larsgunnar ^a   Simonsson, Kjell ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive process; Aluminium alloys; Hydroforming; Optimization

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; HARDENING; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ADAPTIVE PROCESS; AXIAL FEEDING; DIE CAVITY; HYDROFORMING;

METAL FORMING;

EID: 34248351109     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.050     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Gao L., Motsch S., and Strano M. Classification and analysis of tube hydroforming processes with respect to adaptive FEM simulations. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 129 (2002) 261-267
2. Yang J.B., Jeon B.H., and Oh S.I. Design sensitivity and optimization of the hydroforming process. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 113 (2001) 666-672
3. Fann K.J., and Hsiao P.Y. Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 140 (2003) 520-524
4. Imaninejad M., Subhash G., and Loukus A. Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45 (2005) 1504-1514
5. Strano M., Jirathearanat S., and Altan T. Adaptive FEM simulation for tube hydroforming: a geometry-based approach for wrinkle detection. Ann. CIRP 50 1 (2001) 185-190
6. Strano M., Jirathearanat S., Shr S.G., and Taylan Altan. Virtual process development in tube hydroforming. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 146 (2004) 130-136
7. Aue-U-Lan Y., Ngaile G., and Altan T. Optimizing tube hydroforming using process simulation and experimental verification. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 146 (2004) 137-143
8. Johnson K.I., Nguyen B.N., Davies R.W., Grant G.J., and Khaleel M.A. A numerical process control method for circular-tube hydroforming prediction. Int. J. Plast. 20 (2004) 1111-1137
9. Aydemir A., de Vree J.H.P., Brekelmans W.A.M., Geers M.G.D., Sillekens W.H., and Werkhoven R.J. An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 159 (2005) 303-310
10. Ray P., and Mac Donald B.J. Determination of the optimal load path for tube hydroforming preocesses using a fuzzy load control algorithm and finite element simulations. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41 (2004) 173-192
11. M. Jansson, L. Nilsson, K. Simonsson, Tube hydroforming of aluminium extrusions using a conical die and extensive feeding, submitted for publication.
12. Barlat F., Brem J.C., Yoon J.W., Chung K., Dick R.E., Choi S.-H., Pourboghart F., Chu E., and Lege D.J. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Part 1. Theory. Int. J. Plast. 19 (2003) 1297-1319
13. Jansson M., Nilsson L., and Simonsson K. On constitutive modeling of aluminum for tube hydroforming applications. Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 1041-1058
14. M. Jansson, L. Nilsson, K. Simonsson, The use of biaxial test data in the validation of constitutive descriptions for tube hydroforming applications, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 184 (2007) 69-76.
15. Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA Theoretical manual (1998), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
16. Asnafi N., and Skogsgårdh A. Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming. Mat. Sci. Eng. A279 (2000) 95-110
17. N. Brännberg, Computational Aspects on Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, Sweden, 1994.
18. P. Nordlund, Adaptivity and Wrinkle Indication in Non-Linear Shell Analysis, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Solid Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.
19. Myers R., and Montgomery D. Response Surface Methodology (1995), John Wiley, New York
20. Roux W., Stander N., and Haftka R.T. Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42 (1998) 517-534
21. Kok S., and Stander N. Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations. Struct. Optim. 18 (1999) 277-295
22. Jansson T., Nilsson L., and Redhe M. Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization-with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 25 (2003) 129-140
23. Redhe M., Forsberg J., Jansson T., Marklund P.O., and Nilsson L. Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems and analysis of the surface approximation error versus the number of function evaluations. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 24 (2002) 185-194