Internal pressure and counterpunch action design in Y-shaped tube hydroforming processes: A multi-objective optimisation approach

Computers and Structures

Volumn 87, Issue 9-10, 2009, Pages 591-602

  Ingarao, Giuseppe ^a   Di Lorenzo, Rosa ^a   Micari, Fabrizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Multi objective optimisation; Pareto solutions; Response surface method; Tube hydroforming

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL APPROACHES; COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS; DESIGN VARIABLES; FILLET RADIUS; INTERNAL FLUID PRESSURES; INTERNAL PRESSURES; METAL-FORMING PROCESS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROBLEMS; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; OPTIMISATION; PARETO SOLUTIONS; PARETO-OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGIES; SEARCH TECHNIQUES; SHEET METAL FORMING; TUBE HYDROFORMING; UNDERFILLING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; SHEET METAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TUBES (COMPONENTS);

METAL FORMING;

EID: 64049113337     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. We L., and Yuying Y. Multi-objective optimization of sheet metal forming process using Pareto-based genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol (2008)
2. Zhang W., and Shivpuri R. Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture. Reliab Eng Syst Safety (2008)
3. Katayama T., Nakamachi E., Nakamura Y., Ohata T., Morishita Y., and Murase H. Development of process design system for press forming-multi-objective optimization of intermediate die shape in transfer forming. J Mater Process Technol 155-156 (2004) 1564-1570
4. Wei L., and Yuying Y. Multi-objective optimization of an auto panel drawing die face design by mesh morphing. Comput-Aid Des 39 (2007) 863-869
5. Shabeer S., and Wang M. Multi-objective optimization of sequential brakeforming processes. J Mater Process Technol 102 (2000) 266-276
6. Gaitonde V.N., Karnik S.R., Achyutha B.T., and Siddeswarappa B. Taguchi optimization in drilling of AISI 316L stainless steel to minimize burr size using multi-performance objective based on membership function. J Mater Process Technol 202 (2008) 374-379
7. Wei L., Yuying Y., Zhongwen X., and Lihong Z. Springback control of sheet metal forming based on the response-surface method and multi-objective genetic algorithm. Mater Sci Eng A (2008)
8. Fann K., and Hsiao P. Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 140 1-3 (2003) 520-524
9. Ponthot J., and Kleinermann J. Optimisation methods for initial/tool shape optimisation in metal forming processes. Int J Vehicle Des 39 1-2 (2005) 14-24
10. Jirathearanat S, Altan T. Optimization of loading paths for tube hydroforming. In: Proceedings of NUMIFORM, Columbus, OH, USA, 2004.
11. Zhao G., Ma X., Zhao X., and Grandhi R. Studies on optimization of metal forming processes using sensitivity analysis methods. J Mater Process Technol 147 (2004) 217-228
12. Schenk O., and Hillmann M. Optimal design of metal forming die surfaces with evolution strategies. Comput Struct 82 (2004) 1695-1705
13. Castro C., Antonio C., and Sousa L. Optimisation of shape and process parameters in metal forging using genetic algorithms. J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 356-364
14. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2nd ed. (2002), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA
15. Roux W.J., Stander N., and Haftka R.T. Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42 (1998) 517-534
16. Kurtaran H., Eskandarian A., Marzougui D., and Bedewi N.E. Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations. Comput Mech 29 (2002) 409-421
17. Lancaster P., and Salkauskas K. An introduction: curve and surface fitting (1986), Academic Press, Inc.
18. Buranathiti T., Cao J., Baghdasaryan L., and Xia Z.C. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 128 (2006) 588-597
19. Kim N.H., Wang H., and Queipo N.V. Int J Reliab Safety 1 1/2 (2006) 102-119
20. Gurlebeck K, Konke C. Adaptive response surface approach using artificial neural network and moving least squares. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on the application of computer science and mathematics in architecture and civil engineering, Weimar, Germany, 12-14 July, 2006.
21. Belytschko T., Krongauz Y., Organ D., Fleming M., and Krysl P. Meshless method: an overview and recent development. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139 (1996) 3-47
22. Belytschko T., Lu Y.Y., and Gu L. Crack propagation by element-free Galerkin-methods. Eng Fract Mech 51 2 (1995) 295-315
23. Most T, Bucher C. An enhanced moving least squares interpolation for the element-free galerkin method III. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computational mechanics solids, structures and coupled problems in engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 5-8 June, 2006.
24. Breitkopf P., Naceur H., Rassineux A., and Villon P. Moving least squares response surface approximation: formulation and metal forming applications. Comput Struct 83 (2005) 1411-1428
25. Rassineux P., Breitkopf P., and Villon P. Simultaneous surface and tetrahedron mesh adaptation using meshfree techniques. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57 (2003) 371-389
26. Ahmetoglu M., and Altan T. Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98 (2000) 25-33
27. Cheng D.M., Teng B.G., Guo B., and Yuan S.J. Thickness distribution of a hydroformed Y-shape tube. Mater Sci Eng A (2008)
28. J Lin J.F., and Yuan S.J. Influence of internal pressure on hydroforming of double handles crankshaft. Mater Sci Eng A (2008)
29. Yang j., and Jeon B.S. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 113 (2001) 666-672
30. Labergere C, Gelin JC. New strategies for optimal control of command laws for tube hydroforming processes. In: Proceedings of the NUMIFORM 2004 conference, 2004.
31. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Micari F. Process parameters calibration in 3D tube hydroforming processes. In: Proceedings of the Esaform, 2007. p. 411-6.
32. Jirathearanat S., Hartl C., and Altan T. Hydroforming of Y-shapes product and process design using FEA simulation and experiments. J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 124-129
33. Di Lorenzo R., Ingarao G., Gagliardi F., and Filice L. Experimental validation of optimisation strategies in hydroforming of T-shaped tubes. Int J Mater Form (2008)
34. Meinders T., Burchitza I.A., Bonte M.H.A., and Lingbeek R.A. Numerical product design: springback prediction, compensation and optimization. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48 (2008) 499-514
35. Di Lorenzo R., Ingarao G., and Chinesta F. A gradient based decomposition approach to optimise pressure path and counter punch action in y-shaped tube hydroforming operations. J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 10.1007/s00170-008-1813-x
36. Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms (2001), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York
37. Marler R.T., Kim C.H., and Arora J.S. System identification of simplified crash models using multi-objective optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 4383-4395
38. Batmaz I., and Tunal S. Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation. Eur J Oper Res 145 (2003) 455-470
39. Wang H., Li E., and Li Guang Y. Optimization of drawbead design in sheet metal forming based on intelligent sampling by using response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol (2008)
40. Messac A., and Mullur A.A. A computationally efficient metamodeling approach for expensive multiobjective optimization. Optim Eng 9 (2008) 37-67