The next generation of collective action research

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 859-879

  Wright, Stephen C ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE ACTION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 70449633569     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01628.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Drury J, Reicher S D. Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 35:35-38.
2. Fiske S T, Gilbert D T, Fiske S T, Gardner L. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2 1998, 357-411. In, Eds., 4th ed., pp, New York, McGraw-Hill
3. Hornsey M, Blackwood L, Louis W, Fielding K, Favor K, Morton T. Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36:1701-1722.
4. Iyer A, Schmader T, Lickel B. Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:572-587.
5. Klandermans B. The social psychology of protest 1997, Oxford, Blackwell
6. Lazarus R S, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping 1984, New York, Springer
7. Mallett R, Huntsinger J, Sinclair S, Swim J. Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2008, 11:451-470.
8. Mummendey A, Kessler T, Klink A, Mielke R. Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76:229-245.
9. Outten H, Schmitt M, Garcia D, Branscombe N. Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review 2009, 58:146-170.
10. Reicher S D. The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology 2004, 25:921-946.
11. Reynolds K, Oakes P, Haslam A, Nolan M, Dolnik L. Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 2000, 4:275-290.
12. Simon B, Klandermans B. Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist 2001, 56:319-331.
13. Simon B, Trötschel R, Dähne D. Identity affirmation and social movement support. European Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 38:935-946.
14. Skitka L J, Bauman C W. Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology 2008, 29:29-54.
15. Smith H J, Ortiz D J, Walker I, Smith H J. Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration 2002, 91-118. In, Eds., pp, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
16. Smith H, Cronin T, Kessler T. Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members' emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology 2008, 29:221-246.
17. Stott C, Drury J. The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts. European Journal of Social Psychology 2004, 34:11-23.
18. Tajfel H. Social identity and intergroup relations 1982, Ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
19. Tajfel H, Turner J C, Austin W G, Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations 1979, 33-48. In, Eds., pp, Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole
20. Taylor D M, McKirnan D J. A five stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology 1984, 23:291-300.
21. Turner J C, Hogg M A, Oakes P J, Reicher S D, Wetherell M S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory 1987, New York, Blackwell
22. Van Zomeren M, Postmes T, Spears R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:504-535.
23. Wright S C, Brown R, Gaertner S L. Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook of social psychology 2001, Vol. 4:409-430. In, Eds., pp, Oxford, Blackwell
24. Wright S C, Dovidio J F, Hewstone M, Glick P, Esses V. Collective action and social change. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination In, Eds., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
25. Wright S C, Lubensky M, Demoulin S, Leyens J P, Dovidio J F. The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities 2009, 291-310. In, Eds., pp, Philadelphia, Psychology Press
26. Wright S C, Taylor D M, Hogg M A, Cooper J. The social psychology of cultural diversity: Social stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. Sage handbook of social psychology 2003, 432-457. In, Eds., pp., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
27. Wright S C, Taylor D M, Moghaddam F M. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990a, 58:994-1003.
28. Wright S C, Taylor D M, Moghaddam F M. The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research 1990b, 4:229-248.