The evaluation of user experience of the virtual world in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic motivation

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 530-553

  Shin, Dong Hee ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION OF USERS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ATTITUDES; USER BEHAVIORS; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INSTRUMENT TESTING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SURVEYS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 70449585630     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447310902963951     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665-694.
2. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.
3. Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16, 814-819.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., & Bednar, L. L., (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-118.
6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
7. Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. (2005) Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied user agent. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 62, 161-179.
8. Brief, A. P., Aldag, R. J., & Russell, C. J. (1979). An analysis of power in a work setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 289-295.
9. Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Brown, J., Graham, T. C. N., & Wright, T. (1998). The Vista environment for the coevolutionary design of user interfaces. Proceedings of CHI 98, 376-383.
11. Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., & Macredie, R. (2000). Individual differences in virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 499-507.
12. Cheong, J., & Park, M. (2005). Mobile Internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Research, 15(2), 125-140.
13. Chou, T., & Ting, C. (2003). The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyberpsycholgoy & Behavior, 6(6), 663-675.
14. Chung, D. (2005). Something for nothing: Understanding purchasing behaviors in social virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 538-554.
15. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology. MIS Quarterly 23, 145-158.
16. Cook, A., Vowles, K., & Brawer, P. (2006). Model validation and structural equation modeling. Pain, 126, 319-320.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Curl, S. S., Olfman, L., & Satzinger, J. W. (1998). An investigation of the roles of individual differences and user interface on database usability. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 29(1), 50-65.
19. Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishingloyalty in e-Service environments. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), 43-56.
20. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
21. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.
22. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
23. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
24. Eissele, M., Siemoneit, O., & Ertl, T. (2006). Transition of mixed, virtual, and augmented reality in smart production environments: An interdisciplinary view. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation, and Mechatronics (pp.1-6), Communications of ACM, New York, New York.
25. Etezadi-Amoli, J., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1996). A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information and Management, 30, 65-73.
26. Fabri, M., & Moore, D. J. (2005, October). Is empathy the key? effective communication via instant messaging. In Proceedings of 11th EATA International Conference on Networking Entities (pp. 23). Valencia Publishing.
27. Fetscherin, M., & Lattemann, C. (2007, June). User acceptance of virtual worlds: An explorative study about second life. Report prepared by SL Research Team.
28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
29. Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2006). Manipulating social presence through the Web interface and its impact on consumer attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(12), 1230-1242.
30. Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 695-704.
31. Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Model, 10, 35-46.
32. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-117.
33. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed., Rev.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 599-610.
35. Huang, M. (2003). Designing website attributes to induce experiential encounters. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 425-442.
36. Igbaria, M. (1993). User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 21, 73-90.
37. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143.
38. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Users reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
39. Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web portals. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110-132.
40. Kitchell, S. (1995). Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(3), 195-205.
41. Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.
42. Kwon, H.S., & Chidambaram, L. (2000, January). A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. Proceedings of the HICSS-34, Hawaii.
43. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Crane, D., Davis, B., Gil-Egui, G., Horvath, K., et al. (2000). Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paperand-pencil instrument. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Presence, Delft, The Netherlands.
44. Marcus, A., & Baumgartner, V. (2005). A practical set of culture dimensions for global userinterface development. In M. Masoodian, S. Jones, & B. Rogers (Ed.), Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction: 6th Asia Pacific Conference, APCHI 2004 (Vol. 3101, pp. 252-261).
45. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a WWW context, Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
46. Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 46(4), 4-13.
47. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.
48. Nowak, K., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism of virtual humans on users' sense of presence, copresence, and social presence. Presence, 12(5), 481-494.
49. Nysveen, H., & Pedersen, H. (2005). Mobilizing the brand. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 257-276.
50. Papadopoulou, P. (2007). Applying virtual reality for trust-building e-commerce environments. Virtual Reality, 11(2), 107-127.
51. Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Reid, D. (2004). A model of playfulness and flow in virtual reality interactions. Presence, 13(4), 451-462.
54. Rettie, R. (2001). An exploration of flow during Internet use. Internet Research, 11(2), 103-113.
55. Schroeder, R. (2002). Social interaction in virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London: Springer-Verlag.
56. Schwarzer, R. (1994). Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychology and Health, 9, 161-180.
57. Shin, D. (2008). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to Cyworld user behavior. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(4), 12-20.
58. Shin, D. (2007a). Potential user factors driving adoption of IPTV: What are customers expecting from IPTV? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(7), 910-918.
59. Shin, D. (2007b). User acceptance of mobile Internet. Interacting with Computers, 19(4), 472-483.
60. Shin, N. (2006). Online learner's flow experience: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705-720.
61. Siekpe, J. S. (2005). An examination of the multidimentionality of flow construct in a computermediated environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 31-43.
62. Straub, D. W., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. H. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information Management, 33, 1-11.
63. Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31-65.
64. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 19(5), 539-573.
65. Twidale, M. B., Nichols, D. M., & Paice, C. D. (1997). Browsing is a collaborative process. Information Processing & Management, 33(6), 761-783.
66. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365.
67. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
68. Venkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (1999). Computer technology training in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 1-28.
69. Ward, L. C., & Thorn, B. E. (2006). The fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: further thoughts on the process of validating a causal model. Pain, 121, 173-174.