Natural recovery of genetic diversity by gene flow in reforested areas of the endemic Canary Island pine, Pinus canariensis

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 244, Issue 1-3, 2007, Pages 122-128

  Navascués, Miguel ^a   Emerson, Brent C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assignment test; Chloroplast microsatellites; Gene flow; Nuclear microsatellites; Silviculture; Temporal samples

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMARKERS; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEMS; GENES;

CHLOROPLAST MICROSATELLITES; GENE FLOW; NUCLEAR MICROSATELLITES; REGENERATED FOREST;

FORESTRY;

ARCHIPELAGO; BIOMARKER; CHLOROPLAST; CONIFEROUS FOREST; ENDEMIC SPECIES; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; IMMIGRATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; REFORESTATION; REGENERATION;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GENES; SILVICULTURE;

ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CANARY ISLANDS; EURASIA; EUROPE; MACARONESIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

PINUS CANARIENSIS;

EID: 34248354402     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams W.T., and Burczyk J. Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. In: Young A.G., Boshier D.H., and Boyle T.J. (Eds). Forest Conservation Genetics. Principles and Practice (2000), CSIRO Publishing & CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK 215-224
2. Auckland L., Bui T., Zhou Y., Shepherd M., and Williams C. Conifer Microsatellite Handbook (2002), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
3. Burgarella, C., 2004. Genetica di popolazione applicata alla conservazione e gestione del patrimonio forestale di Quercus ilex L. in Sicilia e in Andalusia. Ph.D. Thesis. Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo.
4. Chagné D., Chaumeil P., Ramboer A., Collada C., Guevara A., Cervera M.T., Vendramin G.G., Garcia V., Frigerio J.-M., Echt C., Richardson T., and Plomion C. Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 (2004) 1204-1214
5. Climent, J., Gil, L., de Tuero, M., 1996. Regiones de Procedencia de Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm. ex DC. ICONA, Madrid.
6. del Arco Aguilar, M.J., Pérez de Paz, P.L., Rodríguez Delgado, O., Salas, M., Wildpret, W., 1992. Atlas Cartográfico de los Pinares Canarios II: Tenerife. Gobierno de Canarias, Consejería de Política Territorial, Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
7. DiFazio S.P., Slavov G.T., Burczyk J., Leonardi S., and Strauss S.H. Gene flow from tree plantations and implications for transgenic risk assessment. In: Walter C., and Carson M. (Eds). Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century (2004), Research Signpost, Kerala, India 405-422
8. Doyle J.J., and Doyle L.J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19 (1987) 11-15
9. Dyer R.J., and Sork V.L. Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 859-866
10. El-Kassaby Y.A. Effect of forest tree domestication on gene pools. In: Young A.G., Boshier D.H., and Boyle T.J. (Eds). Forest Conservation Genetics. Principles and Practice (2000), CSIRO Publishing & CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK 197-213
11. Gil, P., 2006. Mejoras selvicolas de masas de repoblación del pino canario, Congreso de los Recursos Forestles. IV Jornadas Forestles de la Macaronesia, Breña Baja (La Palma, Spain).
12. Glaubitz J.C., Murrell J.C., and Moran G.F. Effects of native forest regeneration practices on genetic diversity in Eucalyptus consideniana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107 (2003) 422-431
13. Glaubitz J.C., Wu H.X., and Moran G.F. Impacts of silviculture on genetic diversity in the native forest species Eucalyptus sieberi. Conserv. Genet. 4 (2003) 275-287
14. Goldstein D.B., Linares A.R., Cavalli-Sforza L.L., and Feldman M.W. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics 139 (1995) 463-471
15. Gómez A., González-Martínez S.C., Collada C., Gil L., and Climent J. Complex population genetic structure in an endemic Canary Island pine using chloroplast microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107 (2003) 1123-1131
16. González-Martínez S.C., Gerber S., Cervera M.-T., Martínez-Zapater J.-M., Alía R., and Gil L. Selfing and sibship structure in a two-cohort stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear SSR markers. Ann. Forest Sci. 60 (2003) 115-121
17. Harju A., and Muona O. Background pollination in Pinus sylvestris seed orchards. Scand. J. Forest Res. 4 (1989) 513-520
18. Ledig F.T. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63 (1992) 87-108
19. Ledig F.T. Genetic variation in Pinus. In: Richardson D.M. (Ed). Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 251-280
20. Lefèvre F. Human impacts on forest genetic resources in the temperate zone: an updated review. Forest Ecol. Manag. 197 (2004) 257-271
21. Lenormand T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (2002) 183-189
22. Lian C., Miwa M., and Hogetsu T. Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity 87 (2001) 88-98
23. Nathan R., and Katul G.G. Foliage shedding in deciduous forests lifts up long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 8251-8256
24. Navascués, M., 2005. Genetic diversity of the endemic Canary Island pine tree, Pinus canariensis. Ph.D. Thesis. University of East Anglia, Norwich.
25. Nei M., Maruyama T., and Chakraborty R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29 (1975) 1-10
26. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89 (1978) 583-590
27. Nielsen R., Tarpy D.R., and Reeve H.K. Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol. Ecol. 12 (2003) 3157-3164
28. Parsons J.J. Human influences on the pine and laurel forests of the Canary Islands. Geograph. Rev. 71 (1981) 253-271
29. Rannala B., and Mountain J.L. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 9197-9201
30. Raymond M., and Rousset F. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49 (1995) 1280-1283
31. Robledo-Arnuncio J.J., and Gil L. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94 (2004) 13-22
32. Schuster W.S., and Mitton J.B. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84 (2000) 348-361
33. Soranzo N., Provan J., and Powell W. Characterization of microsatellite loci in Pinus sylvestris L. Mol. Ecol. 7 (1998) 1260-1261
34. Vaxevanidou Z., González-Martínez S., Climent J., and Gil L. Tree populations bordering on extinction: a case study in the endemic Canary Island pine. Biol. Conserv. 129 (2006) 451-460
35. Vendramin G.G., Lelli L., Rossi P., and Morgante M. A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 595-598
36. Wang J., and Whitlock M.C. Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. Genetics 163 (2003) 429-446
37. Waples R.S. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121 (1989) 379-391
38. Yazdani R., and Lindgren D. Variation of pollen contamination in a Scots pine seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 40 (1991) 243-246