Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 311-322

  Tzou, Ren Chuen ^a   Lu, Hsi Peng ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Brand attachment; Ergonomics; Innovation diffusion theory; Perceived aesthetics; TAM; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

BRAND ATTACHMENT; INNOVATION DIFFUSION THEORY; PERCEIVED AESTHETICS; TAM; UNIQUENESS;

CONSUMER ELECTRONICS; DIFFUSION; ERGONOMICS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

INNOVATION;

EID: 70449556785     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290701763454     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams-Price, C. and Greene, A.L., 1990. Secondary attachments and adolescent self-concept. Sex Roles, 22, 187-198.
2. Baker, W.E., 2003. Does brand name imprinting in memory increase brand information retention? Psychology and Marketing, 20, 1119-1135.
3. Ball, A.D. and Tasaki, L.H., 1992. The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 155-172.
4. Bearden, W.O. and Rose, R.L., 1990. Attention to social comparison information: An individual difference factor affecting consumer conformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 461-471.
5. Belk, R.W., 1988. Possessions and extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
6. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., and Kim, Y.G., 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87-111.
7. Bowlby, J., 1958. The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350-373.
8. Bowlby, J., 1980. Attachment and loss, vol.3: Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
9. Celsi, R.L., Rose, R.L., and Leigh, T.W., 1993. An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1-23.
10. Chin, W.W., 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 7-16.
11. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., and Newsted, P.R., 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/ adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189-217.
12. Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A., 1995. On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19, 237-264.
13. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.
14. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretic models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
15. Fell, D.R., Hansen, E.N., and Becker, B.W., 2003. Measuring innovativeness for the adoption of industrial products. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 347-353.
16. Fisher, R.J. and Price, L.L., 1992. An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 477-486.
17. Fitzmaurice, J., 2005. Incorporating consumers' motivations into the theory of reasoned action. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 911-929.
18. Fornell, C.D. and Larcker, F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
19. Fornell, C., 1982. A second generation of multivariate analysis. New York: Praeger Publishers.
20. Fromkin, H.L., 1970. Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of indistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521-529.
21. Hair, J.F., et al., 1992. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
22. Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P., and Hsu, H.H., 2007. Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science, 35, 715-726.
23. Lu, H.P. and Tzou, R.C., 2006. The impacts of perceived aesthetics on fashion technology based on technology acceptance model. In: The 35th annual meeting of the western decision science institute. Hawaii.
24. Lynn, M., 1991. Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8, 43-57.
25. Lynn, M. and Harris, J., 1997. Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1861-1883.
26. McAlister, L. and Pessemier, E., 1982. Variety seeking: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311-322.
27. McCracken, G., 1986. Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 71-84.
28. Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G., 2001. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information and Management, 38, 217-230.
29. Moore, G.A., 1991. Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
30. Nail, P.R., 1986. Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 190-206.
31. Peluso, P., Kern, R., and White, J., 2004. A comparison of attachment theory and individual psychology. Journal for Counseling and Development, 82, 139-145.
32. Quey, T.M. and Malhotra, N.K., 2004. Technology transformation and purposed play: Model development and implications for high tech product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 28, 62-87.
33. Rai, A., Lang, S.S., and Welker, R.B., 2002. Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13, 50-69.
34. Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion of innovation. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
35. Rubinstein, R.L. and Parmelee, P.A., 1992. Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In: I. Altman and S.M. Low, eds. Place attachment. New York: Plenum, 139-163.
36. Schouten, J.W. and Mcalexander, J.H., 1995. Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 43-61.
37. Shang, R.A., Chen, Y.C., and Shen, L., 2005. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop online. Information and Management, 42, 401-413.
38. Simonson, I. and Nowlis, S.M., 2000. The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.
39. Slater, S.F. and Mohr, J., 2006. Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: Insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 26-33.
40. Snyder, C.R., 1992. Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 9-24.
41. Snyder, C.R. and Fromkin, H.L., 1977. Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518-527.
42. Sproles, G.B., 1981. Analyzing fashion life cycle - principles and perspectives. Journal of Marketing, 45, 116-124.
43. Srite, M. and Karahanna, E., 2006. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 679-704.
44. Sun, H. and Zhang, P., 2006. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 64, 53-78.
45. Tepper, K., 1994. Need for uniqueness: An individual difference factor affecting nonconformity in consumer response. In: C.W. Park and D.C. Smith, eds. Marketing theory and applications: Proceedings of the 1994 AMA winter educators' conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 207-208.
46. Tepper, K., William, O.B., and Hunter, G.L., 2001. Consumers' need for uniqueness: scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66.
47. Thomson, M., MacInnis, D.J., and Park, C.W., 2005. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers' emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 77-91.
48. Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365.
49. Vogel, C.M., Cagan, J., and Boatwright, P., 2005. The design of things to come: how ordinary people create extraordinary products. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.
50. Wonglimpiyarata, J. and Yuberk, N., 2005. In support of innovation management and Roger's innovation diffusion theory. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 411-422.
51. Yongjun, S. and Tinkham, S.F., 2005. Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea common and culture-specific factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 334-350.